Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer writes ("Re: Bits from the Release Team:
ride like the wind, Bullseye!"):
> My personal point of view (and because of this it might be biased)
> is that the maintainers of the packages that ship autopkgtest should
> be the reponsibles for any breackage it might
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
nmu lutok_0.4+dfsg-1 . all amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild on buildd for
transition to bullseye"
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: bul
Control: tag -1 - d-i
Hi Jonathan,
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 02:37:25PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> As there's a udeb involved I will just check with the d-i release managers
> that this isn't an issue, though I can't see that fixing a crash would be
> all that controversial.
I can confirm
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - d-i
Bug #933764 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package e2fsprogs/1.44.5-1+deb10u1
Removed tag(s) d-i.
--
933764: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933764
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Sun, 18 Aug 2019 12:18:40 +0100
with message-id <1566127120.5665.11.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#935028: nmu: lutok_0.4+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #935028,
regarding nmu: lutok_0.4+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Sun, 18 Aug 2019 15:26:14 +0200
with message-id <54380ddc-3434-49e3-12af-0a72393e0...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#934872: RM: ocaml-usb/1.3.0-4 ocaml-sqlexpr/0.5.5-3
zeroinstall-injector/2.12.3-2 obus/1.1.5-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #934872,
regarding RM: ocaml
On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 16:42 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I would like to update usbutils in stretch to update the usb.ids
> database. There is no code change, the changes only adds a few
> hundred of USB devices to the database. There are a lot of new
> entries as this hasn't been updated for qui
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 11:03 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> Buster's cryptsetup (2:2.1.0-5) doesn't cope well with LUKS2 headers
> without any bound keyslot: adding a new key slot to such a header
> fails, both via the crypt_keyslot_add_by_volume_key() API call and
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed d-i
Bug #934956 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package cryptsetup/2:2.1.0-5+deb10u1
Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed.
--
934956: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934956
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 10:20 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> There's a crash in Stretch with ICU, there's a missing NULL check in
> the LocalArray class. It crashes ICU with certain options / use
> case[1]. Upstream fixed it[2] and now I would like to make it to
>
S
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #934952 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package icu/57.1-6+deb9u3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
934952: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934952
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 21:44 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> I'd like to upload a fix for open-vm-tools to proposed-updates which
> actually allows to recognize buster.
>
> `lsb_release -sd` currently prints
> Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
> but the current implementation in open-vm-tools expects 1
On 8/16/19 9:35 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
So is the conclusion there that docker.io is or is not actually
affected?
Yes docker.io is affected as well.
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 18:01 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> I have just uploaded ncurses 6.1+20181013-2+deb10u1 to Buster which
> contains a one-line fix for bug #933053[1], the same as in version
> 6.1+20190713-2 which is now in testing.
>
> Some background: for abo
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed d-i
Bug #934163 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
ncurses/6.1+20181013-2+deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
934163: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934163
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro
On 2019-08-18 15:27, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 16:42 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I would like to update usbutils in stretch to update the usb.ids
> > database. There is no code change, the changes only adds a few
> > hundred of USB devices to the database. There are a lot
Dear Release Team,
I'm new to the process of uploading to stable, I need your guidance on
that one.
From the buster announce:
* The bug you want to fix in stable must be fixed in unstable
already (and not waiting in NEW or the delayed queue)
My issue with this particular bug (#9330
On Sun, 2019-08-18 at 16:56 +0200, Arnaud Rebillout wrote:
> * The bug you want to fix in stable must be fixed in unstable
> already (and not waiting in NEW or the delayed queue)
>
> My issue with this particular bug (#933002) is that for now,
> docker.io doesn't build in unstable. It w
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 08:54:21AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > On 19/08/08 09:46, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > I think we should also try to improve the visibility towards reverse
> > > dependencies that their autopkgtest is blocking other packages. I would
> > > love tracker (and the old pts) to sho
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 04:29:31PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Now that we release buster, I would like to move llvm-defaults to
> llvm-toolchain-8.
Ok, let's go!
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #931551 [release.debian.org] transition: llvm-defaults to 8
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
931551: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931551
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 934112
Bug #934112 [release.debian.org] transition: poco
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
934112: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934112
Debian Bug Trackin
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #934368 [release.debian.org] transition: x265
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
934368: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934368
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 10:47:03AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> As usual, libx265 bumped its SONAME. All reverse dependencies build fine
> against the new version. Please let me know once it's a good time to
> upload the new version from experimental to unstable.
P
Hi Adam
Am 16.08.19 um 22:08 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Fri, 2019-07-26 at 21:43 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> I'd like to make a stable upload for systemd, fixing the following
>> issues:
> [...]
>> 241-5+deb10u1 is identical to 241-7 which has been uploaded
On 2019-08-18 17:58:59, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > As usual, libx265 bumped its SONAME. All reverse dependencies build fine
> > against the new version. Please let me know once it's a good time to
> > upload the new version from experimental to unstable.
>
> Please go ahead.
Thanks, uploaded.
On 8/18/19 4:35 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 21:44 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> I'd like to upload a fix for open-vm-tools to proposed-updates which
>> actually allows to recognize buster.
>>
>> `lsb_release -sd` currently prints
>> Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
>> but
27 matches
Mail list logo
