Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package heimdal
* Security fixes for CVE-2018-16860 and CVE-2019-12098.
* FTBFS bug fix.
Note I excluded the changes to the certificates from the following patch,
because a
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 09:07:11PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 12:32:13AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Source: mercurial
> > Version: 4.8.2-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: security
> >
> > See https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/WhatsNew from 4.9:
> >
> > This
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 929676 + lintian
Bug #929676 [release.debian.org] unblock: lintian/2.15.0
Added indication that 929676 affects lintian
> tags 929577 + pending
Bug #929577 [src:lintian] lintian: Please keep the version in buster up to date
Added tag(s) pen
Your message dated Tue, 28 May 2019 20:41:13 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: unblock: heimdal/7.5.0+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #929665,
regarding unblock: heimdal/7.5.0+dfsg-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 929607 - moreinfo
Bug #929607 [release.debian.org] unblock: qemu/1:3.1+dfsg-8 (pre-upload)
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
929607: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Hi Zigo,
On Tue, 21 May 2019 17:50:28 +0200 Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Note that it may (or not) break some reverse dependencies, though according
> to upstream, OpenStack (the biggest SQLAlchemy consumer in Debian) behaves
> correctly with it. If this happens, t
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Bug #929321 [release.debian.org] unblock: sqlalchemy/1.2.18+ds1-2
(CVE-2019-7164 CVE-2019-7548)
Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed.
--
929321: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929321
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact o
Your message dated Tue, 28 May 2019 21:03:20 +0200
with message-id <738290a8-4a1c-7caa-4b59-50d205404...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: unblock: golang-github-seccomp-libseccomp-golang/0.9.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #929591,
regarding unblock: golang-github-seccomp-libseccomp-golang/0.9
Hi Nikolaus,
On 27-05-2019 22:58, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> IIRC the necessary changes are isolated and easy to backport.
> However, the new release is already in testing which IIRC makes
> things more complicated.
If your interested to provide these fixes, then please revert the new
upstream release
Control: reopen -1
On 28-05-2019 21:03, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Shengjing,
>
> On Mon, 27 May 2019 02:24:07 +0800 Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>> unblock golang-github-seccomp-libseccomp-golang/0.9.0-2
>
> Unblocked, thanks.
A fellow RT member pointed out that there are reverse build depends that
shou
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #929591 {Done: Paul Gevers } [release.debian.org]
unblock: golang-github-seccomp-libseccomp-golang/0.9.0-2
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #929591 to the same values
previously set
--
929591: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 3:19 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> Control: reopen -1
>
> On 28-05-2019 21:03, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Hi Shengjing,
> >
> > On Mon, 27 May 2019 02:24:07 +0800 Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> >> unblock golang-github-seccomp-libseccomp-golang/0.9.0-2
> >
> > Unblocked, thanks.
>
> A fel
Your message dated Tue, 28 May 2019 21:41:47 +0200
with message-id <0ed4fdbe-9a11-425a-e168-06232b7d9...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#928185: unblock: openjdk-11/11.0.3+7-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #928185,
regarding unblock: openjdk-11/11.0.3+7-4
to be marked as done.
This means t
I can test the fix and git-annex on my Debian machine too: it's ARM,
Kirkwood, armv5tel. There, currently, git-annex fails as described in #5.
I am suffering this bug a lot, as reported here:
http://git-annex.branchable.com/bugs/Linux_standalone_on_armv5tel__58___error__58_34__git-annex_died_o
Hi,
On 28-05-2019 22:56, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 28/05/2019 à 21:41, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>
>> Thanks for this information, it was valuable.
>>
>> I'm not happy with the current situation, but I'll let openjdk-11 go
>> into buster now.
>
> Thank you Paul. Should we upload openjdk-11/11.0.3+7
Le 28/05/2019 à 22:59, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> I was under the impression that doko wanted the current version in
> buster and that he and the security team want the next openjdk when it's
> ready.
Tony Mancill has prepared the tpu upload yesterday and Matthias was ok
with 11.0.3+7 in testing [1]
> "Emmanuel" == Emmanuel Bourg writes:
I'm not on the release team and cannot authorize a TPU.
As an interested bystander I'd ask that you make sure any TPU contains a
fix for the serious accessibility issue in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=900912
On 29.05.19 00:23, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> "Emmanuel" == Emmanuel Bourg writes:
>
> I'm not on the release team and cannot authorize a TPU.
>
>
> As an interested bystander I'd ask that you make sure any TPU contains a
> fix for the serious accessibility issue in
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi
> "Matthias" == Matthias Klose writes:
Matthias> On 29.05.19 00:23, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>> "Emmanuel" == Emmanuel Bourg writes:
>>
>> I'm not on the release team and cannot authorize a TPU.
>>
>>
>> As an interested bystander I'd ask that you make sure any
Se você precisa desenvolver ou evoluir qualquer tipo de software, seja para seu
uso, de sua empresa, ou para comercialização, entre em contato conosco.
Trabalhamos com desenvolvimento de sistemas, aplicativos, jogos, rotinas, em
todas as plataformas.
Vamos estudar seus objetivos e necessidade
20 matches
Mail list logo
