Bug#893507: jessie-pu: package reportbug/6.6.3+deb8u1

2018-06-10 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Adam, On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 08:53:32PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 14:39 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > This is the corresponding request to #891918 but for jessie-pu. > > > > I like to propose the following little change fo

Bug#885584: jessie-pu: package ncurses/5.9+20140913-1+deb8u3

2018-06-10 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2018-06-08 21:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Thu, 2017-12-28 at 11:43 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: >> > The same problem with the same fix as in #885582 for stretch. > > Please go ahead. Apologies for the very long delay. Uploaded, thanks. Cheers,

stretch-ignore for invalid maintainer address ?

2018-06-10 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Hi, can we tag "Invalid maintainer address pkg-foo...@lists.alioth.debian.org" bugs as stretch-ignore? Andreas

Re: stretch-ignore for invalid maintainer address ?

2018-06-10 Thread Philipp Kern
On 6/10/18 11:40 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > can we tag > "Invalid maintainer address pkg-foo...@lists.alioth.debian.org" > bugs as stretch-ignore? As we need a way to reach people, I suppose that'd only make sense if the metadata has been fixed in unstable, no? Kind regards Philipp kern

Bug#901248: Britney crashes in _compute_groups when attempting migration

2018-06-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney Hi! This is a slightly different form of the issue we recently discussed on IRC, but it likely has the same cause: arch:all package being available in different versions in arm64 vs amd64 fo

Re: stretch-ignore for invalid maintainer address ?

2018-06-10 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 10/06/18 11:40, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Hi, > > can we tag > "Invalid maintainer address pkg-foo...@lists.alioth.debian.org" > bugs as stretch-ignore? Yes, or they could be tagged "sid buster" as we don't intend to fix those in stable. Emilio

Bug#900514: marked as done (nmu: gnucobol_2.2-1)

2018-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2018 20:22:36 +0200 with message-id <87lgbmpklv@turtle.gmx.de> and subject line Re: Bug#900514: nmu: gnucobol_2.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #900514, regarding nmu: gnucobol_2.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

jessie-security packages missing from ftp-master

2018-06-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, As we're getting very close to the EOL point release for jessie (at least from the main archive perspective), I've been having a look at making the delta from the security archive as small as possible beforehand. Packages not synced to ftp-master = I've added

Bug#901276: jessie-pu: package lame/3.99.5+repack1-7+deb8u2

2018-06-10 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, lame 3.99.5+repack1-7+deb8u1 is affected by several vulnerabilities in the code used to read the input file. These issues are not present in any Debian release after Jessie beca

Bug#899006: stretch-pu: package intel-microcode/3.20180425.1~deb9u1

2018-06-10 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 09 Jun 2018, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 10:32 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > I'd like to update the intel-microcode package in Debian stretch. > > > > This update adds the microcode-side fix for CVE-2017-5715 aka Spectre

Bug#867461: Bug#858539: should ca-certificates certdata.txt synchronize across all suites?

2018-06-10 Thread Michael Shuler
On 06/08/2018 03:37 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Ping? We're a week away from the final chance to get an update into jessie-as-oldstable before it becomes jessie-lts. Thanks for the ping. I updated the debian-jessie branch of ca-certificates with mozilla bundle 2.22, and it's ready to be upload

Processed: blocking 898934 by 900530

2018-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 898934 by 900530 Bug #898934 [release.debian.org] transition: libmygpo-qt 898934 was not blocked by any bugs. 898934 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 898934: 900530 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Re: stretch-ignore for invalid maintainer address ?

2018-06-10 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2018-06-10 18:24, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 10/06/18 11:40, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> can we tag >> "Invalid maintainer address pkg-foo...@lists.alioth.debian.org" >> bugs as stretch-ignore? > > Yes, or they could be tagged "sid buster" as we don't intend to fix those in