Maximiliano Curia:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Dear release team,
>
> I've backported some upstream fixes in kio for stretch that I consider
> worthwhile, these are all described in the correspoding debia
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:22:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#859942: unblock: networkmanager-qt/5.28.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #859942,
regarding unblock: networkmanager-qt/5.28.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:30:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#859936: unblock: ktexteditor/5.28.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #859936,
regarding unblock: ktexteditor/5.28.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:28:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#859939: unblock: kwidgetsaddons/5.28.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #859939,
regarding unblock: kwidgetsaddons/5.28.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:31:00 +
with message-id <1b0e98ef-4720-a21d-3e78-ae0031127...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#859931: unblock: kpty/5.28.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #859931,
regarding unblock: kpty/5.28.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:34:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#859922: unblock: cinnamon-screensaver/3.2.13-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #859922,
regarding unblock: cinnamon-screensaver/3.2.13-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Ben Hutchings:
> When implementing signed kernel packages, I wanted to make the signed
> image packages (built from linux-signed) take un-suffixed names so that
> existing procedures to install specific kernel versions would pick the
> signed packages, and users would be discouraged from installing
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:54:31 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#859950: unblock: plasma-framework/5.28.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #859950,
regarding unblock: plasma-framework/5.28.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Control: reopen -1
diff -Nru libmongo-client-0.1.8/debian/libmongo-client-doc.maintscript
libmongo-client-0.1.8/debian/libmongo-client-doc.maintscript
--- libmongo-client-0.1.8/debian/libmongo-client-doc.maintscript
2017-04-08 21:57:18.0 +0200
+++ libmongo-client-0.1.8/debian/libm
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #860140 {Done: Niels Thykier } [release.debian.org]
unblock: libmongo-client/0.1.8-3
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #860140 to the same values
previously set
--
860140: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=8
Ugh, Joerg told me he verified it to work :(.
> On Apr 12, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> Control: reopen -1
>
> diff -Nru libmongo-client-0.1.8/debian/libmongo-client-doc.maintscript
> libmongo-client-0.1.8/debian/libmongo-client-doc.maintscript
> --- libmongo-client-0.1.8/deb
Hi piuparts developers,
I see you have been busy filing bugs for issues in the upgrade path.
Many thanks for that, it is greatly appreciated. :)
Do you have an overview of how the upgrade paths are looking these days?
Like how much have we tested vs. how much is missing?
Thanks,
~Niels
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:20:04PM +0900, Satoru KURASHIKI wrote:
> hi,
>
> To fix RC bug #857748, I've upload updated package to mentors,
> which include changes only:
> - new upstream version
> - use libmodule-install-rtx-perl
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rt-extension-custom
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017, Niels Thykier wrote:
> If the maintainer agrees with you on it, I am happy to accept that patch
> for stretch.
OK, thanks.
> Mind you, I am also open to reviewing his proposal of
> adding those headers even with -a (letting -a override the
> auto-generated ones when there is
Le Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 03:24:53PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>
> as a follow-up to #858183, I looked at which other R Bioconductor
> packages were broken by R 3.3.3-1, and it seems that the previous round
> of binNMUs did not repair some of them.
> nmu r-bioc-rsamtools_1.26.1-2 . ANY . -m
On 2017-04-12 13:26, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I see you have been busy filing bugs for issues in the upgrade path.
> Many thanks for that, it is greatly appreciated. :)
>
> Do you have an overview of how the upgrade paths are looking these days?
> Like how much have we tested vs. how much is missin
Hi,
Am 12.04.2017 um 15:06 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
> On 2017-04-12 13:26, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I see you have been busy filing bugs for issues in the upgrade path.
>> Many thanks for that, it is greatly appreciated. :)
>>
>> Do you have an overview of how the upgrade paths are looking these d
Hi,
(explicitly Cc-ing Emilio and Aurelien, who usually take care of tzdata uploads)
According to https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tzdata we have:
[2017-04-07] Accepted tzdata 2017b-0+deb7u1 (source all) into oldstable (Emilio
Pozuelo Monfort)
[2017-04-08] Accepted tzdata 2017b-0+deb8u1 (source a
On 12/04/17 15:49, Michael Prokop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (explicitly Cc-ing Emilio and Aurelien, who usually take care of tzdata
> uploads)
>
> According to https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tzdata we have:
>
> [2017-04-07] Accepted tzdata 2017b-0+deb7u1 (source all) into oldstable
> (Emilio Pozuelo Mo
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 03:06:12PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Looking at wheezy2jessie2stretch (we don't have that on piuparts.d.o),
how is that different from https://piuparts.debian.org/wheezy222testing/
which we *do* have on piuparts.d.o? (added by you :)
for those not aware: wheezy222te
retitle 860025 unblock: bsdmainutils/9.0.12+nmu1
tags 860025 - moreinfo
thanks
Niels Thykier dixit:
>Please go ahead and remove the moreinfo tag once the NMU has reached
>unstable + have been built on all relevant architectures.
According to https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=bsdmain
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 860025 unblock: bsdmainutils/9.0.12+nmu1
Bug #860025 [release.debian.org] unblock: bsdmainutils/9.0.12+nmu1
(pre-approval)
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: bsdmainutils/9.0.12+nmu1' from 'unblock:
bsdmainutils/9.0.12+nmu1 (pre-approval)'.
* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [Wed Apr 12, 2017 at 04:29:36PM +0200]:
> On 12/04/17 15:49, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > According to https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tzdata we have:
> > [2017-04-07] Accepted tzdata 2017b-0+deb7u1 (source all) into oldstable
> > (Emilio Pozuelo Monfort)
> > [2017-04-08] Ac
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:40:00 +
with message-id <034189af-57db-245e-f359-c46a392e9...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#859255: binNMU needed for more R packages.
has caused the Debian Bug report #859255,
regarding binNMU needed for more R packages.
to be marked as done.
Thi
On 2017-04-12 15:19, Michael Biebl wrote:
> We regularly get a report about
> https://jenkins.debian.net/job/chroot-installation_jessie_install_gnome_upgrade_to_stretch_aptdpkg_first/
> failing.
>
> Regular dist-upgrades of GNOME (i.e. no separate apt/dpkg upgrade first)
> work fine though.
>
> I
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 05:59:29PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2017-04-12 16:35, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 03:06:12PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> >> Looking at wheezy2jessie2stretch (we don't have that on piuparts.d.o),
> >
> > how is that different from https:/
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 05:59:29PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2017-04-12 16:35, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 03:06:12PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> >> Looking at wheezy2jessie2stretch (we don't have that on piuparts.d.o),
> >
> > how is that different from https:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock package bijiben
I discovered that the bijiben gnome-shell provider and internal bijiben
search were not working at all. The included patch fix that by renaming
the remai
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:21:00 +
with message-id <267ca027-60f9-e04a-3956-0bb6e95aa...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: unblock: xapian-core/1.4.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #859756,
regarding unblock: xapian-core/1.4.3-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:34:51 +0200
with message-id <20170412163448.ga1...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: unblock: LDC and rdeps
has caused the Debian Bug report #855229,
regarding unblock: LDC and rdeps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 07:50 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Ben Hutchings:
> > When implementing signed kernel packages, I wanted to make the signed
> > image packages (built from linux-signed) take un-suffixed names so that
> > existing procedures to install specific kernel versions would pick the
>
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 09:54:42AM +, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> This is a pre-upload request to update tomcat8 to the version 8.5.12-1
> in stretch. This version is mostly a bug fix release, it also addresses
> compatibility issues with Java 9 which will
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Bug #858016 [release.debian.org] unblock: tomcat8/8.5.12-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed.
--
858016: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=858016
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:47:51 +0200
with message-id <20170412164750.ga1...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#858891: unblock: non-free otrs2/5.0.17-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #858891,
regarding unblock: non-free otrs2/5.0.17-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 19:19:39 +0200
with message-id <20170412171937.ga1...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#856610: unblock: sqlalchemy/1.1.5+ds1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #856610,
regarding unblock: sqlalchemy/1.1.5+ds1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Michael Tokarev:
> 05.04.2017 20:42, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>
>> On Wed, 05 Apr 2017 09:35:19 +0300 Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: unblock
>>>
>>> Please unblock
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 11:20:25 +0200 Balint Reczey
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> Current kodi version in Stretch is 2:17.0+dfsg1-3 but upstrea
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Bug #859708 [release.debian.org] unblock: kodi/2:17.1+dfsg1-2
Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo.
--
859708: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859708
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 01:20:32PM +0200, Ondřej Nový wrote:
> Please consider unblock of package python-tornado 4.4.3-1.
>
> This is new upstream bugfix release, which fix this bug:
> - The tornado.auth module has been updated for compatibility with a change
> to
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Bug #859872 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): flask/0.12.1-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed.
--
859872: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859872
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On Sat, 08 Apr 2017 12:57:41 +0200 Ondřej Nový wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please consider unblocking of flask 0.12.1-1.
>
> This upstream bugfix release fixies
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #859876 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): python-tornado/4.4.3-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
859876: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859876
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ansible
Ansible has a potentially exploitable RCE that was just made public
today. In cooperation with the security team, I've prepared an upload
to unstable with
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:00:00 +
with message-id <3e2bf17c-e219-c107-01b1-36e4a3c80...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#859962: unblock: augeas/1.8.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #859962,
regarding unblock: augeas/1.8.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:25:29 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock rt-extension-customfieldsonupdate
has caused the Debian Bug report #858779,
regarding unblock: rt-extension-customfieldsonupdate/1.02-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:27:12 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock bsdmainutils
has caused the Debian Bug report #860025,
regarding unblock: bsdmainutils/9.0.12+nmu1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:31:07 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock ansible
has caused the Debian Bug report #860196,
regarding unblock: ansible/2.2.1.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:30:10 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock bijiben
has caused the Debian Bug report #860186,
regarding unblock: bijiben/3.20.2-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 05:32:18PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Please unblock package django-anymail
>
> This is a pre-upload request. django-anymail 0.8-1 is currently in
> in experimental. If this is approved, I'll upload to unstable with no changes
> other
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #859306 [release.debian.org] unblock: django-anymail/0.8-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
859306: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859306
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 859794 + moreinfo
Bug #859794 [release.debian.org] unblock: salt/2016.11.2+ds-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
859794: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 08:33:57 PM Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 05:32:18PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Please unblock package django-anymail
> >
> > This is a pre-upload request. django-anymail 0.8-1 is currently in
> > in expe
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:05:33 +0200
with message-id <20170412190531.ga1...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#857752: unblock: apt-cacher-ng/3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #857752,
regarding unblock: apt-cacher-ng/3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Processing control commands:
> reopen 857752
Bug #857752 {Done: Ivo De Decker } [release.debian.org]
unblock: apt-cacher-ng/3-1
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #857752 to the same values
previously set
--
856635: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:10:19 +0200
with message-id <20170412201017.ga2...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#857752: unblock: apt-cacher-ng/3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #857752,
regarding unblock: apt-cacher-ng/3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release Team, please unblock package gegl.
This revision fixes the FTBFS on arm64, as reported in #856135.
Attached, a debdiff from former failing -3 revision.
Cheers.
mfv
-- Syst
Your message dated Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:12:13 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock gegl
has caused the Debian Bug report #860215,
regarding unblock: gegl/0.3.8-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
2017-04-12 19:49 GMT+02:00 Ivo De Decker :
> Looks like you forgot the diff. Could you send it?
>
yep, sorry for it, attaching now.
--
Best regards
Ondřej Nový
Email: n...@ondrej.org
PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5 6090 3573 1255 9D1E 064B
diff -Nru python-tor
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #859876 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): python-tornado/4.4.3-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
859876: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859876
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gnome-shell-pomodoro
The new version that has been in unstable for 15 days fixes:
- 1 important bug #860149 that affects greatly the usability of the
application
-
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #859872 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): flask/0.12.1-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
859872: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859872
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Uploaded and built. Thanks.
--
Best regards
Ondřej Nový
Email: n...@ondrej.org
PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5 6090 3573 1255 9D1E 064B
62 matches
Mail list logo
