Hello Antonio,
Antonio Terceiro [2016-12-21 18:13 -0200]:
> > 0) figure out how to test all of this without breaking the real
> > instances (hints more than welcome).
> > 1) fix autopkgtest to enable --apt-suite (next to the current --apt-pocket)
> > In parallel:
> > 2a) getting a testing suite up
Hi all,
is this just a race or needs manual intervention or do I miss something
important here?
The attached email, that arrived earlier today, tells me the package
will be removed from testing because of a bug that was closed by
exactly the version of the package listed in the email.
Thanks.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libncursesada.
The version in testing fails to build (#844918) because of dpkg
changes affecting PIE flags in libraries.
Here is the debdiff against the package in t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 849456 unblock: libncursesada/6.0.20150808-2
Bug #849456 [release.debian.org] unblock: libncursesada/5.9.20140726-2
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: libncursesada/6.0.20150808-2' from 'unblock:
libncursesada/5.9.20140726-2'.
>
End of messag
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear RT,
I'd like to get CVE-2015-0839 fixed in jessie, it's a no-DSA issue, and
security team members suggested to get it fixed through stable updates.
This bug is a simple 'fetch
On 27/12/16 12:08, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is this just a race or needs manual intervention or do I miss something
> important here?
>
> The attached email, that arrived earlier today, tells me the package
> will be removed from testing because of a bug that was closed by
> exactly th
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2016 16:53:51 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#849456: unblock: libncursesada/5.9.20140726-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #849456,
regarding unblock: libncursesada/6.0.20150808-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2016 16:54:37 +0100
with message-id <504ab781-5eef-7c74-fd0c-8c2276fcf...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#849309: nmu: bino_1.6.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #849309,
regarding nmu: bino_1.6.5-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
retitle -1 release.debian.org: binNMU for e2fsck-static to rebuild against
latest dietlibc
reassign -1 release.debian.org
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag -1 binnmu
thanks
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 12:16:52PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 22:49 -0500, Theodo
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: close -1
Control: reassign -2 release.debian.org
Control: severity -2 normal
Control: retitle -2 nmu: e2fsck-static
Control: tags -2 + jessie pending
On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 12:31 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> retitle -1 release.debian.org: binNMU for e2fsck-static to r
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #847575 [e2fsck-static] Embeds dietlibc (GPL) but does not have a
Built-Using field
Bug 847575 cloned as bug 849488
> close -1
Bug #847575 [e2fsck-static] Embeds dietlibc (GPL) but does not have a
Built-Using field
Marked Bug as done
> reassign -2 r
Hi,
The next point release for "jessie" (8.7) is scheduled for Saturday,
January 14th. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 07:56:36PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Thankfully none of that worked. I say thankfully, because you'd have
> given release.d.o an allegedly RC bug (it may be RC for e2fsprogs, it's
> certainly not so for release.d.o) and removed the original bug from
> where it belongs.
On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 16:13 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 07:56:36PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Thankfully none of that worked. I say thankfully, because you'd have
> > given release.d.o an allegedly RC bug (it may be RC for e2fsprogs, it's
> > certainly not so for re
Hi,
experimental build fine. Waiting for green light
I see you have setup the transition matrix
Bastien
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
nodejs 4.6.1~dfsg-1 provides nodejs-abi-46
nodejs 6.9.2~dfsg-1 provides nodejs-abi-48
I recently uploaded fixes to all Node.js c++ addons
so they use dh_nodejs to depend on the correct n
16 matches
Mail list logo
