On 03/03/16 23:00, Micha Lenk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Given Debian bug #802812 is open, the migration of gstreamer0.10 0.10.36-1.5
> to testing just one day after its removal seems to be unintended.
Yes, that was unintended and due to the fact that #802812 was tagged "stretch".
I removed the package fr
On 04/03/16 03:08, allen wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:38:05 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>>
>>> This check would probably have avoided #810785 where ifupdown 0.8.6
>>> entered testing with a Breaks against the version of systemd which
>>> is in testing.
>>>
> In bug report #707219 you wro
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 09:08:38PM -0500, allen wrote:
> So here it is March 3, tonight I've tried to install Debian Testing, on a new
> to me laptop, and I've run into a failure at the 'Select and Install
> Software'
> step. Opening a shell and looking at syslog reveals that the problem is bug
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
When the font-sil-andika package is installed in Jessie, the fontconfig
library print out these warnings for all X programs usi
On 04/03/16 19:01, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> - ruby-pgplot is in contrib, can't remember what we usually did,
> I'll ping the maintainer.
That build-depends on packages from non-free, so you need a manual upload with
binaries for all architectures where the package is currently built (so a
Just so everybody has the current state:
- weechat #816312 has a patch, could NMU if nothing happens in the
next few days
- uwsgi #816315 sitting in binNEW
- subversion - just sent bugmail
- libguestfs #816610 / qemu #815409
- ruby-pgplot is in contrib, can't remember what we usually did,
I'll
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
Hello Release Team!
I noticed something awkward about the unstable→testing migration
and it seems to me that it's not even the first time I see it...
It appears that the migration waits 5
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #816697 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package
fonts-sil-andika/1.004-2+deb8u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
816697: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816697
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 07:36 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> When the font-sil-andika package is installed in Jessie, the fontconfig
> library print out these warnings for all X programs using fontconfig:
>
> Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-andika.conf",
On 04/03/16 00:21, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 03-03-16 21:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> All rdeps on mips64el are affected by this bug and will need to be
>> rebuilt with gdal (2.0.2+dfsg-2), sorry about that.
No problem. Scheduled.
>> I think this requires both new NMUs combined wit
Your message dated Fri, 4 Mar 2016 16:56:54 +0100
with message-id <56d9b046.9040...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#816428: nmu: hugin_2015.0.0+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #816428,
regarding nmu: hugin_2015.0.0+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:50:56 +
with message-id <1457117456.1948.41.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#816708: release.debian.org: migration waits 5 days
despite urgency=high
has caused the Debian Bug report #816708,
regarding release.debian.org: migration waits
On Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:50:56 + Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> That package version is not in the list of uploads and urgencies fed to
> britney by dak (most likely due to dinstall having had some issues
> recently), so the default urgency is being used.
Ah, I see: I hope these issues may be fixed s
Your message dated Fri, 4 Mar 2016 09:51:19 +0100
with message-id <56d94c87.30...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#813532: transition: libjsoncpp
has caused the Debian Bug report #813532,
regarding transition: libjsoncpp
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On 04-03-16 00:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 04/03/16 00:21, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 03-03-16 21:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> All rdeps on mips64el are affected by this bug and will need to be
>>> rebuilt with gdal (2.0.2+dfsg-2), sorry about that.
>
> No problem. Sched
Processing changes file: python-imaging_1.1.7-4+deb7u2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: python-imaging_1.1.7-4+deb7u2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: python-imaging_1.1.7-4+deb7u2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: python-imaging_1.1.7-4+deb7u2_armhf.chang
Looks like we missed xapian-bindings. I've given it a quick test
rebuild on amd64, and it builds correctly for 2.3.
Not sure how this works, but ruby-xapian manages to not depend on
any librubyX.Y package!?
Thank you,
--
,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' 7D1A CFFA
17 matches
Mail list logo
