Your message dated Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:34:44 +0100
with message-id <56af26b4.3000...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#813240: nmu: lazarus_1.4.4+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #813240,
regarding nmu: lazarus_1.4.4+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #810568 [release.debian.org] transition: openexr
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
810568: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810568
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 9/14/15, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Thanks. Please feel free to upload.
The fixed package ruby-tzinfo was uploaded at last to jessie-pu.
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 01/02/16 08:43, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> All packages now do compile with newer openexr. blender is in
> experimental, and thus will need a SU at some point.
OK. Let's do this.
Cheers,
Emilio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The upload of openmpi1.10 triggered an auto-openmpi transition, as
expected and wanted.
The rest, is premature.
Its not fully ready for transition, and I need to put a blocker on it.
Small fixes for kFreeBSD, Hurd: (conditional use of --verbs in
co
On 01/02/16 12:41, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>
> The upload of openmpi1.10 triggered an auto-openmpi transition, as
> expected and wanted.
> The rest, is premature.
The problem is that you uploaded the package directly to unstable, without
asking for a transition slot and without fixing those pro
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 03:38:21PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> The problem is that you uploaded the package directly to unstable, without
> asking for a transition slot and without fixing those problems you mention
> beforehand. It'd have been better to upload it to experimental until th
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:41:17AM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> The upload of openmpi1.10 triggered an auto-openmpi transition, as
> expected and wanted.
> The rest, is premature.
>
> Its not fully ready for transition, and I need to put a blocker on it.
> Small fixes for kFreeBSD, Hurd
Hi!
On 2016-02-01 at 16:10 (CET), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> OK. Let's do this.
IlmBase and OpenEXR uploaded.
Thanks.
--
Matteo F. Vescovi || Debian Developer
GnuPG KeyID: 4096R/0x8062398983B2CF7A
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 jessie-pu: package
Bug #802331 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package
cyrus-imapd-2.4/2.4.17+nocaldav-1
Changed Bug title to 'jessie-pu: package' from 'jessie-pu: package
cyrus-imapd-2.4/2.4.17+nocaldav-1'
--
802331: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
Control: retitle -1 jessie-pu: package
cyrus-imapd-2.4/2.4.17+nocaldav-0~deb8u1
So, it looks like the security queue is quite stalled, so I will use
your offer to p-u.
Just changed s/jessie-security/jessie/ and preparing the rebuild.
debdiff should be same as already attached except this change.
On 06-12-15 17:01, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 03-12-15 19:11, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 03/12/15 19:07, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> Because libgsl0-dev is not a transitional package to pull in libgsl-dev
>>> and libgsl2, all gsl rdeps need to update their build dependencies
>>
On 28-01-16 16:37, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 05:25:22 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> Can we fix this once and for all, or do we have to rely on hints to
>> migrate netcdf packages every time?
>
> Yes, please feel free to get the reverse deps of the remaining cruft
> f
If I'm looking right at this transition the only remaining package is
pbbam, where the maintainer-built binary was built against the old
libssl.
Please binNMU it.
Does it being ma:same implies you should binNMU all archs to preserve
coinstallability?
--
regards,
Mattia R
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 810597 pending
Bug #810597 [release.debian.org] transition: gnutls28
Added tag(s) pending.
> tag 811219 pending
Bug #811219 [release.debian.org] transition: netcdf
Added tag(s) pending.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Hi Emilio,
On 01-02-16 10:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> nmu lazarus_1.4.4+dfsg-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against fpc 3.0.0"
>
> Scheduled. Note you want ANY, not ALL.
Please be aware that I just answered N to the reportbug question:
Choose the request type: 1
Please enter the name of the pac
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 07:50:32PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Scheduled. Note you want ANY, not ALL.
>
> Please be aware that I just answered N to the reportbug question:
> Is this request for specific architectures? [y|N|?]?
>
> The result is ALL. Do you want me to file a bug against reportbu
Hi
On 01-02-16 20:05, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> No, you just need to update your reportbug, it was fixed in version
> 6.6.5, see #795687.
Ok, good to know. I run jessie on my laptop. And yes, I indent to switch
to strech soon.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Your message dated Mon, 1 Feb 2016 19:23:29 +
with message-id <20160201192329.gc13...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#811394: transition: libimobiledevice
has caused the Debian Bug report #811394,
regarding transition: libimobiledevice
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Mon, 1 Feb 2016 20:44:41 +0100
with message-id <20160201194441.ga...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#813238: nmu: vlc_2.2.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #813238,
regarding nmu: vlc_2.2.1-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 17:58 -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 06:04:48PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control; tags -1 + confirmed
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 11:34 -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > This fixes a serious bug which stops a
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #813004 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package ruby-defaults/1:2.1.5+deb8u2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
813004: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813004
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 01/02/16 16:10, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 03:38:21PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> The problem is that you uploaded the package directly to unstable, without
>> asking for a transition slot and without fixing those problems you mention
>> beforehand. It'd have bee
On 01/02/16 18:14, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> If I'm looking right at this transition the only remaining package is
> pbbam, where the maintainer-built binary was built against the old
> libssl.
>
> Please binNMU it.
>
> Does it being ma:same implies you should binNMU all archs to preserve
> coinsta
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 812925 jessie
Bug #812925 [release.debian.org] nmu: glib2.0_2.42.1-1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #812925 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
812925: http:
On 01.02.2016 15:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 01/02/16 12:41, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
The upload of openmpi1.10 triggered an auto-openmpi transition, as
expected and wanted.
The rest, is premature.
The problem is that you uploaded the package directly to unstable, without
asking for
Processing changes file: ruby-defaults_2.1.5+deb8u2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/02/2016 15:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 01/02/16 12:41, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>>
>> The upload of openmpi1.10 triggered an auto-openmpi transition, as
>> expected and wanted.
>> The rest, is premature.
>
> The problem is that y
Hi Ben,
Pulling in d-i on this, since they might be affected by this. If you
know of a maintainer that would be similarly affected, let me know, so
we can ask them as well.
Ben Hutchings:
> [...]
>
> For stretch, I would very much like to choose a kernel version for
> stretch that gets longterm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/02/2016 16:34, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:41:17AM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>> The upload of openmpi1.10 triggered an auto-openmpi transition, as
>> expected and wanted.
>> The rest, is premature.
>>
>>
30 matches
Mail list logo
