Julien Cristau a écrit le 03/09/2015 07:26 :
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 01:26:35 +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>
>> So where does this 'MUST NOT' come from just now that all that work is over?
>>
> It comes from me wanting to get gcc-defaults migrated this week. Which
> is incompatible with getti
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #795288 [release.debian.org] nmu: libsigc++-2.0_2.4.1-2
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
--
795288: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=795288
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: severity -1 important
synfigstudio is failing to build because of this:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=synfigstudio&arch=arm64&ver=1.0-1%2Bb2&stamp=1441235058
The "synfig" command gives:
*** Error in `synfig': munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0x14e27940 ***
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 795288 normal
Bug #795288 [release.debian.org] nmu: libsigc++-2.0_2.4.1-2
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
795288: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
Hi,
Thanks but I need some help.
This version 4.46.0-1+debu8u1 had typo. s/debu/deb/ Just after I
uploaded this, I realize this and run dcut ... but it did not seem to
find uploaded files. I have since uploaded fixed package with version
4.46.0-1+deb8u1 I have no idea what to do.
On Sat, Aug 2
On 2015-09-03 13:23, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
Thanks but I need some help.
This version 4.46.0-1+debu8u1 had typo. s/debu/deb/ Just after I
uploaded this, I realize this and run dcut ... but it did not seem to
find uploaded files. I have since uploaded fixed package with version
4.46.0-1+deb8u1
Processing changes file: getmail4_4.46.0-1+debu8u1_amd64.changes
REJECT
Hi
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:23:00PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> This version 4.46.0-1+debu8u1 had typo. s/debu/deb/ Just after I
Excuse me for the noise. I got a nice auto-REJECT :-)
getmail4 - incorrect version number; RoM
No wonder I could not erase...
Thanks.
Osamu
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 2015-09-03 15:44, Laurent Destailleur (eldy) wrote:
A security error CVE-2015-3935 was reported for Dolibarr ERP CRM
package. This bug is fixed into official package 3.5.7 of Dolibarr.
Package 3.5.7 is a maintenance release compared to 3.5.5 and contains
only fixes
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #797906 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package dolibarr/3.5.5+dfsg1-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
797906: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797906
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Sorry. I didn't understood your answer (my english is not my mother
language).
You are speaking about "unstable".
I am speaking about pushing a CVE fix into stable 3.5.5. This fix is part
of a patch that include other fix and this patch is called 3.5.7.
My question is can I push fix1 + fix2 + fix
On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 19:05 +0200, Laurent Destailleur (aka Eldy) wrote:
[...]
> Do you mean
> * i need first to update upstream of "unstable" with 3.8 (so it will
> include the CVE fix)
That would be the first step, yes. Then we'd consider which of:
> to be ok to fix stable with the maintenance
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:56:50AM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
>
> synfigstudio is failing to build because of this:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=synfigstudio&arch=arm64&ver=1.0-1%2Bb2&stamp=1441235058
>
> The "synfig" command gives:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear Release Team,
While trying to build clblas, it failed due to a problem with boost.
I see that there is at least one more package failing due this.
I rebuilt boost and it worked here so
Package: release.debian.org
Hi,
I would like to remove the last support for SSLv3 in openssl.
This means that I'll be dropping 3 symbols from the shared
library:
SSLv3_method();
SSLv3_server_method();
SSLv3_client_method();
Those can still be used to set up SSLv3 connections, while using
the SSL
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 797926 transition
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 08:51:05PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> My question is how you want to proceed with this. I see a few
> options:
> - Change the soname, rebuild everything against that new soname.
> - Just drop the symbol
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was j...@debian.org).
> usertags 797926 transition
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: transition.
> severity 797926 normal
Bug #797926 [
Your message dated Thu, 3 Sep 2015 20:11:48 +0100
with message-id <20150903191147.gc3...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#797621: release.debian.org: binNMU critterding on
hurd-i386
has caused the Debian Bug report #797621,
regarding release.debian.org: binNMU critterding on
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 20:51:05 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> - Just drop the symbols, adding Breaks on at least some
> packages like curl and python that are known to need a rebuild
> against the changed headers.
>
Definitely not.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 14:41:47 -0400, Fernando Seiti Furusato wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> While trying to build clblas, it failed due to a problem with boost.
> I see that t
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 10:06:17PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 20:51:05 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > - Just drop the symbols, adding Breaks on at least some
> > packages like curl and python that are known to need a rebuild
> > against the changed headers.
> >
>
Hi Julien.
Thanks for the quick response.
My apologies for it was actually a problem with my machine.
I have re-done it to confirm with sbuild and it worked fine.
This can be closed.
Really sorry for the noise!
Thank you.
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 11:04:27PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 10:06:17PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 20:51:05 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > > - Just drop the symbols, adding Breaks on at least some
> > > packages like curl and python that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 797924 + wontfix
Bug #797924 [release.debian.org] nmu: boost1.58_1.58.0+dfsg-3
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> close 797924
Bug #797924 [release.debian.org] nmu: boost1.58_1.58.0+dfsg-3
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please co
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 22:37:31 +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> New gcc5 transition notices are still being sent out with the "Such a change
> can be avoided, if you have a soversion bump and you upload this version
> instead of the renamed package" wording (e.g. simgear
> https://bugs.debian.o
New gcc5 transition notices are still being sent out with the "Such a
change can be avoided, if you have a soversion bump and you upload this
version instead of the renamed package" wording (e.g. simgear
https://bugs.debian.org/797944 ); is this a mistake, or is hdf5 special
because it has both
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was j...@debian.org).
> usertags 796925 transition
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: transition.
> reassign 796925 release.debian.org
B
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 785541 -moreinfo
Bug #785541 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package paraview/4.1.0+dfsg+1-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
785541: http://bugs.debian.org/cg
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Package yade fails its unittests because minieigen was
built with <
On 25 August 2015 at 04:00, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 at 13:22:49 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Sndobj requires a transition. Renamed package has been uploaded to
>> experimental and is in NEW.
>
> Since sndobj does not appear to build-depend on any libraries that need a
> tran
30 matches
Mail list logo
