Bug#779080: unblock (pre-approval): gtk+2.0/2.24.25-2

2015-02-24 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please consider unblocking planned upload of package gtk+2.0. + * debian/patches/0001-Make-gdk_event_apply_filters-safe-against-changes-in.patch: +Cherry-pick patch from upstream stab

Bug#779083: wheezy-pu: package lame/3.99.5+repack1-3

2015-02-24 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: wheezy User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi there, please grant permission to upload an updated package for lame in wheezy. The package will contain three patches that have been created to cope with a couple of crashes tha

Bug#779075: unblock: partman-target/94

2015-02-24 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Niels Thykier (2015-02-24): > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: d-i > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Hi, > > This package already got unblocked by the RT; we just need waiting for > a d-i ack. It fixes two RC bugs (according to Britney)

Bug#779083: wheezy-pu: package lame/3.99.5+repack1-3

2015-02-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On 2015-02-24 10:59, Fabian Greffrath wrote: please grant permission to upload an updated package for lame in wheezy. The package will contain three patches that have been created to cope with a couple of crashes that were detected by feeding fuzzed wav file samples

Processed: Re: Bug#779083: wheezy-pu: package lame/3.99.5+repack1-3

2015-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #779083 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package lame/3.99.5+repack1-3 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 779083: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779083 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To U

Bug#779059: marked as done (unblock: qmail-run/2.0.2+nmu1)

2015-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:49:58 +0100 with message-id <20150224134957.gc19...@ugent.be> and subject line Re: Bug#779059: unblock: qmail-run/2.0.2+nmu1 has caused the Debian Bug report #779059, regarding unblock: qmail-run/2.0.2+nmu1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#776748: (pre-approval) unblock: libxml2/2.9.1+dfsg1-5 (via t-p-u)

2015-02-24 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi, On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 04:48:59PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On PTS it says: > > * Unblock request by ivodd ignored due to version mismatch: 2.9.1+dfsg1-5 > > > > Anything wrong? > > Not on our side. > > The PTS is only checking the excuses for unstable, which is obviously > not un

Bug#779067: marked as done (unblock: wine/1.6.2-20)

2015-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:51:22 +0100 with message-id <20150224135122.gd19...@ugent.be> and subject line Re: Bug#779067: unblock: wine/1.6.2-20 has caused the Debian Bug report #779067, regarding unblock: wine/1.6.2-20 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#779083: wheezy-pu: package lame/3.99.5+repack1-3

2015-02-24 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am Dienstag, den 24.02.2015, 13:17 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > Please use 3.99.5+repack1-3+deb7u1 as the version number and feel free > to upload. The current distribution of "stable-proposed-updates" will > work, but "wheezy" is more self-documenting. Done, thank you! - Fabian -- To U

Bug#779134: nmu: testdisk_6.14-3, partclone_0.2.73-2

2015-02-24 Thread Agustin Martin
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Seems that there was yet another ntfs-3g library transition, now from libntfs-3g852 to libntfs-3g853 (source:ntfs-3g) making testdisk and partclone again uninstallable in sid. Please trigg

Processed: tagging 776144, tagging 778734

2015-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Waiting for d-i ack > tags 776144 - confirmed Bug #776144 [release.debian.org] unblock: dbus/1.8.16-1 Removed tag(s) confirmed. > tags 778734 - confirmed Bug #778734 [release.debian.org] unblock: bind9/9.9.5.dfsg-9 Removed tag(s) confirmed. > th

Processed: Re: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8

2015-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 d-i Bug #776276 [release.debian.org] unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8 Added tag(s) d-i. -- 776276: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776276 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8

2015-02-24 Thread Niels Thykier
Control: tags -1 d-i On 2015-02-11 00:02, Christian Seiler wrote: > Control: retitle -1 unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8 > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > > Dear release team, > > please consider unblocking open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8. The > upload fixes two bugs: #735773, where

Bug#773865: marked as done (unblock: imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-4 [security])

2015-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:46:20 +0100 with message-id <54ecc6fc.9010...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#773865: unblock: imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-4 [security] has caused the Debian Bug report #773865, regarding unblock: imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-4 [security] to be marked as done. This

Bug#775566: marked as done (unblock: plptools/1.0.9)

2015-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:55:42 +0100 with message-id <54ecc92e.8080...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#775566: unblock: plptools/1.0.9 has caused the Debian Bug report #775566, regarding unblock: plptools/1.0.9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Processed: Re: Bug#778858: jessie-pu: package openafs/1.6.9-2+deb8u1

2015-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Bug #778858 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package openafs/1.6.9-2+deb8u1 Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo. -- 778858: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778858 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wi

Bug#778858: jessie-pu: package openafs/1.6.9-2+deb8u1

2015-02-24 Thread Niels Thykier
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo On 2015-02-20 19:31, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: jessie > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > The latest kernel (security) update included a KPI change, moving > d_alias to the d_u u

Bug#779013: jessie-pu: package phppgadmin/5.1-1

2015-02-24 Thread Niels Thykier
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags -1 -pu usertags -1 unblock tags -1 jessie severity 669837 grave thanks On 2015-02-23 10:47, Jean-Michel Nirgal Vourgère wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > Tags: jessie > Severity:

Bug#779013: marked as done (unblock: package phppgadmin/5.1-1)

2015-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2015 20:42:54 +0100 with message-id <54ecd43e.30...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#779013: jessie-pu: package phppgadmin/5.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #779013, regarding unblock: package phppgadmin/5.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: retitle 779013 to unblock: package phppgadmin/5.1-1

2015-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 779013 unblock: package phppgadmin/5.1-1 Bug #779013 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package phppgadmin/5.1-1 Changed Bug title to 'unblock: package phppgadmin/5.1-1' from 'jessie-pu: package phppgadmin/5.1-1' > thanks Stopping processing

Processed: jessie-pu is not useful until jessie is released

2015-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 778858 unblock: openafs/1.6.9-2+deb8u1 Bug #778858 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package openafs/1.6.9-2+deb8u1 Changed Bug title to 'unblock: openafs/1.6.9-2+deb8u1' from 'jessie-pu: package openafs/1.6.9-2+deb8u1' > user release.debia

Bug#778759: marked as done (unblock: suricata/2.0.6-3)

2015-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:55:28 +0100 with message-id <20150224215528.ga17...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#778759: unblock: suricata/2.0.6-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #778759, regarding unblock: suricata/2.0.6-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#778673: marked as done (unblock: suricata/2.0.6-2)

2015-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:55:28 +0100 with message-id <20150224215528.ga17...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#778759: unblock: suricata/2.0.6-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #778673, regarding unblock: suricata/2.0.6-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#776839: marked as done (unblock: libgit2/0.21.3-1.1)

2015-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2015 23:01:18 +0100 with message-id <20150224220117.gb17...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#776839: unblock: libgit2/0.21.3-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #776839, regarding unblock: libgit2/0.21.3-1.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#778985: unblock: orafce/3.0.7-4

2015-02-24 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:25:16PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Mehdi Dogguy 2015-02-22 <20150222174611.gb14...@dogguy.org> > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 03:32:26PM +0100, Christoph Berg > > wrote: > > > + > > > +-\set ECHO all; > > > ++\set ECHO none > > > + > > > > Is it missing a semi-

Bug#778985: marked as done (unblock: orafce/3.0.7-4)

2015-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2015 23:15:21 +0100 with message-id <20150224221521.gd17...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#778985: unblock: orafce/3.0.7-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #778985, regarding unblock: orafce/3.0.7-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Uploading linux (3.16.7-ckt7-1)

2015-02-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
I intend to upload linux version 3.16.7-ckt7-1 to unstable later this week. This will include: - Many fixes from stable release 3.16.7-ckt{5,6,7} - New hardware support: Olimex A20-OLinuXino-LIME2, GPIO backlight driver (for BeagleBone Black LCD7 cape) - Security fixes: CVE-2015-1465, CVE-2015-1

Bug#779172: unblock: sweethome3d/4.5+dfsg-3

2015-02-24 Thread tony mancill
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Dear Release Team, Please consider an unblock of the package sweethome3d. sweethome3d/4.5+dfsg-3 addresses an RC bug #778947 by disabling the automatic version check "phone home" feature

Processed: Re: Bug#779013: jessie-pu: package phppgadmin/5.1-1

2015-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 779013 grave Bug #779013 {Done: Niels Thykier } [release.debian.org] unblock: package phppgadmin/5.1-1 Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 779013: http:/

Processed: your mail

2015-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 779013 normal Bug #779013 {Done: Niels Thykier } [release.debian.org] unblock: package phppgadmin/5.1-1 Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 779013: http:

Processed: severity of 779013 is normal

2015-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 779013 normal Bug #779013 {Done: Niels Thykier } [release.debian.org] unblock: package phppgadmin/5.1-1 Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 779013 to the same value. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you nee

Bug#774211: freeze exception for binutils 2.25-3

2015-02-24 Thread Matthias Klose
On 02/23/2015 10:29 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 2014-12-30 12:29, Matthias Klose wrote: >> forgot to mention that there are no regression in the binutils testsuite on >> all >> release architectures, and that there are no regression in the gcc-4.8 and >> gcc-4.9 te

Bug#774211: freeze exception for binutils 2.25-3

2015-02-24 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2015-02-25 07:53, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 02/23/2015 10:29 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Control: tags -1 moreinfo >> >> On 2014-12-30 12:29, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> forgot to mention that there are no regression in the binutils testsuite on >>> all >>> release architectures, and that there