Processing control commands:
> tags -1 d-i
Bug #778366 [release.debian.org] unblock: kfreebsd-10/10.1~svn274115-2
Added tag(s) d-i.
--
778366: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778366
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Control: tags -1 d-i
On 2015-02-14 04:22, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> Severity: normal
> x-debbugs-cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org
>
> Please consider unblocking kfreebsd-10. It fixes 2 security issues
Tags: confirmed
Le 2015-02-14 00:25, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
Moritz Mühlenhoff (aka jmm) made me aware of CVE-2014-7231, which has
been
fixed in the release 0.2.0 of python-oslo.utils. This version has
never been
uploaded to Sid (I uploaded it to Experimental instead), as I didn't
want to
ri
Tags: confirmed
Le 2015-02-13 13:48, Paul Gevers a écrit :
In order to fix bug 777622, I prepared a repacked tar ball and the
attached
changes to the packaging of Lazarus. I completely stripped the
lcl/interfaces/carbon directory from the tar ball, which could be done
safely because it is not
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:53:16 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#54: pre-approval: unblock: cqrlog/1.8.2-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #54,
regarding pre-approval: unblock: cqrlog/1.8.2-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
control: retitle -1 unblock: shutdown-at-night/0.15
control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi,
< mehdi> | h01ger: please upload and tell me when it gets accepted.
the package has been accepted into unstable, this is the diff to jessie:
$ debdiff shutdown-at-night_0.14.dsc shutdown-at-night_0.15.dsc
di
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 unblock: shutdown-at-night/0.15
Bug #777527 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): shutdown-at-night/0.15
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: shutdown-at-night/0.15' from 'unblock
(pre-approval): shutdown-at-night/0.15'
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #777527 [r
On 17-02-15 10:27, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Tags: confirmed
>
> Le 2015-02-13 13:48, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>>
>> In order to fix bug 777622, I prepared a repacked tar ball and the
>> attached
>> changes to the packaging of Lazarus. I completely stripped the
>> lcl/interfaces/carbon directory from the
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:29:58 +0100
with message-id <1c168cd001f20dfef9ea8f01aefd3...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#778309: [preapprove] unblock: lazarus/1.2.4+dfsg2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #778309,
regarding [preapprove] unblock: lazarus/1.2.4+dfsg2-1
to be marked
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:27:58 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#777527: unblock: shutdown-at-night/0.15
has caused the Debian Bug report #777527,
regarding unblock: shutdown-at-night/0.15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Hey Niels,
Niels Thykier [2015-02-16 20:10 +0100]:
> I have not had time to review this fully. However, I noticed #778565,
> which suggests a regression in this version of udev. I am putting this
> unblock request on hold until you have had a time to review #778565.
Michael and I responded to t
On 02/17/2015 10:21 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Tags: confirmed
>
> Le 2015-02-14 00:25, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
>> Moritz Mühlenhoff (aka jmm) made me aware of CVE-2014-7231, which has
>> been
>> fixed in the release 0.2.0 of python-oslo.utils. This version has
>> never been
>> uploaded to Sid (I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 778353 unblock: python-oslo.utils/0.2.0-1 (fixing CVE-2014-7231)
Bug #778353 [release.debian.org] pre-approval for unblock:
python-oslo.utils/0.2.0-1 (fixing CVE-2014-7231)
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: python-oslo.utils/0.2.0-1 (fixing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 777649 -moreinfo
Bug #777649 [release.debian.org] unblock: cgmanager/0.33-2+deb8u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
777649: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:50:20 +0100
with message-id <20150217145020.ga17...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#773653: unblock: slim/1.3.6-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #773653,
regarding unblock: slim/1.3.6-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 04:10:07PM -0500, Michael Gilbert
wrote:
> +ndisc6 (1.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> +
> + * QA upload.
> + * Set maintainer to the Debian QA Group (see #71300
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
I'd like to upload the following patch to stable-proposed-updates to fix
#778409, which the security team doesn't think warrants a DSA (and
honestly I'd have to agree). Would this b
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:45:30 +0100
with message-id <20150217154530.gc17...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#778353: pre-approval for unblock:
python-oslo.utils/0.2.0-1 (fixing CVE-2014-7231)
has caused the Debian Bug report #778353,
regarding unblock: python-oslo.utils/0.2.0-1
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 06:07:56AM +0100, Mike Gabriel
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please consider unblocking planned upload of package freerdp.
>
Did you raise the severity to grave only to have
Hi Mehdi,
no, the severity was set by the bug submitter IIRC.
I recently downgraded the severity to important to avoid removal from testing
and because of the malformed command line the bug submitter used.
Nonetheless, segfaults should not happen and the provided patch fixes that.
Mike
--
D
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #13 [release.debian.org] unblock: xorg-server/2:1.16.4-1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
13: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=13
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #778366 [release.debian.org] unblock: kfreebsd-10/10.1~svn274115-2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
778366: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778366
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSC
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Hi,
Steven Chamberlain (2015-02-14):
> Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > Please consider unblocking kfreebsd-10. It fixes 2 security issues:
> > https://security-tracker.debian.org/kfreebsd-10
When I saw this request come in, I meant to ask one of the maintainers
to confirm
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Julien Cristau (2015-02-11):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-debbugs-cc: k...@debian.org
>
> Please unblock package xorg-server. New upstream stable release with a
> few bugfixes in
Adam D. Barratt (2015-02-14):
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
Do I double-confirm it then? ;)
> On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 16:54 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > Please consider unblocking isc-dhcp. It fixes a regression in init
> > script error handling (bug #755834, unfortunate bug # typo in t
Adam D. Barratt (2015-02-14):
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
>
> On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 21:41 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > ltsp 5.5.4-3 fixes an RC bug in ltsp removing obsolete config files from
> > pre-wheezy versions of ltsp. It also removes an ugly, hackish workaround
> > no longer
Adam D. Barratt (2015-02-15):
> On Sun, 2015-02-15 at 16:37 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Adam D. Barratt, le Sun 15 Feb 2015 12:20:57 +, a écrit :
> > > On Sun, 2015-02-15 at 02:53 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > Please unblock package brltty
> > > >
> > > > While testing for bug #
Ivo De Decker (2015-02-14):
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:11:20PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > Please consider unblocking glibc. It fixes 5 security issues:
> > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/glibc
> >
> > unblock glibc/2.19-15
> > unblock-udeb glibc/2.19-15
>
>
Cyril Brulebois, le Tue 17 Feb 2015 18:29:03 +0100, a écrit :
> Yeah, it seems a little safer (at least mind-appeasing) to have another
> pair of eyes looking at changes affecting (packages producing) udebs,
> even if changes aren't supposed to affect udebs anyway.
Right :)
> Of course it comes w
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:43:48 +0100
with message-id <2ae9f02c62560dfab6c504267ab64...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#778444: unblock: brltty/5.2~20141018-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #778444,
regarding unblock: brltty/5.2~20141018-4
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:46:28 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#778351: unblock: isc-dhcp/4.3.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #778351,
regarding unblock: isc-dhcp/4.3.1-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:45:38 +0100
with message-id <00d5d1dc7a11cde0c35d3f20a8b1a...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#778368: unblock: ltsp/5.5.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #778368,
regarding unblock: ltsp/5.5.4-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:47:10 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#13: unblock: xorg-server/2:1.16.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #13,
regarding unblock: xorg-server/2:1.16.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 778492 + moreinfo
Bug #778492 [release.debian.org] unblock: ndisc6/1.0.1-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
778492: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=77849
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:59:53 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#777042: unblock: suricata/2.0.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #777042,
regarding unblock: suricata/2.0.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Le 2015-02-10 11:05, Simon McVittie a écrit :
Control: retitle 776144 unblock: dbus/1.8.16-1
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 at 21:47:44 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
While I'm waiting for the d-i ack anyway, I've uploaded dbus/1.8.14-2
to
avoid the bad dbus/systemd trigger interactions in upgrades
... a
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:08:14 +0100
with message-id <5e90e597e50157a59ead4d1a9dbfd...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#778366: unblock: kfreebsd-10/10.1~svn274115-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #778366,
regarding unblock: kfreebsd-10/10.1~svn274115-2
to be marked as done.
Th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 776144 + confirmed
Bug #776144 [release.debian.org] unblock: dbus/1.8.16-1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
776144: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=7761
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package cvsweb
There is an incompatibility with Perl 5.18, which can be fixed by the patch
added in 3:3.0.6-8. The bug itself
Le 2015-02-16 23:09, Hilko Bengen a écrit :
* Julien Cristau:
1. Override upstream's decision to change the SONAME with every
release.
I am not entirelysure how stable libhtp's API/ABI should be
considered -- looking at changes and deciding on compatibility
issues
making those decisi
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:38:39 +0100
with message-id <293e4f2c60242348285f676d83ea5...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: The libhtp SONAME mismatch *is* a policy violation.
has caused the Debian Bug report #777040,
regarding unblock: libhtp/0.5.16-1
to be marked as done.
This means th
Hi,
Le 2015-02-17 19:06, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
There is an incompatibility with Perl 5.18, which can be fixed by the
patch
added in 3:3.0.6-8. The bug itself has been reported with severity
important.
However the reporter speaks about "errors".
Is this relevant for Perl >=5.18, or 5.18
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 776144 + d-i
Bug #776144 [release.debian.org] unblock: dbus/1.8.16-1
Added tag(s) d-i.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
776144: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776144
Debian Bu
On 2015-02-12 13:52, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-02-11 20:46 GMT+01:00 Peter Palfrader :
>> It seems the buildd team is severely understaffed and needs help.
>
> If this rumor turns to be a reality, are there some prerequisites
> potential volunteers could have a look to in the event the
Hi all,
Le 2015-01-16 23:37, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:03:08PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Please unblock package tbb
It fixes two grave bugs: #756233 & #762656
It also fixes a longer term issue, as depicted in comment: #775263#17
So
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 21:31:34 +0100
with message-id <902ce77295d150e829e84aec9cb80...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#775892: unblock (pre-approval): python-django/1.7.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #775892,
regarding unblock: python-django/1.7.4-1
to be marked as done.
T
Hi,
Le 2015-02-17 17:52, Mike Gabriel a écrit :
no, the severity was set by the bug submitter IIRC.
I recently downgraded the severity to important to avoid removal from
testing and because of the malformed command line the bug submitter
used.
Nonetheless, segfaults should not happen and the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 775506 + moreinfo
Bug #775506 [release.debian.org] unblock: tbb/4.2~20140122-5
Bug #776890 [release.debian.org] unblock: tbb/4.2~20140122-5
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Tags: moreinfo
Hi,
Le 2015-02-13 11:24, Vincent Danjean a écrit :
+ * Fix oar-node pid file location (Closes: #772564)
Accepted.
+ * Fix errors with the TRUNCATE SQL request which is incompatible
with MySQL
+and causes deadlocks with PostgreSQL (Closes: #773790)
Accepted.
+ * F
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 22:09:56 +0100
with message-id <53caa98617a28e51e4824d4981498...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#768368: unblock: wxglade/0.7.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #768368,
regarding unblock: wxglade/0.7.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 22:20:55 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#769279: Bug#769046: inn2: Allow for better TLS
configurability
has caused the Debian Bug report #769279,
regarding (pre-approval) unblock: inn2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 778295 + moreinfo
Bug #778295 [release.debian.org] unblock: oar/2.5.4-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
778295: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778295
D
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 778636 + moreinfo
Bug #778636 [release.debian.org] unblock: cvsweb/3:3.0.6-8
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
778636: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 23:34:22 +0100
with message-id <9430ecd82ada4510b7af9db268bd7...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#770178: unblock: blt/2.5.3+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #770178,
regarding unblock: blt/2.5.3+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 23:38:25 +0100
with message-id <956dd58fcde051d86488c21bc0821...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#771520: unblock: libsodium/1.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #771520,
regarding unblock: libsodium/1.0.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package procmail. It fixes several heap overflows
and memory corruptions spotted in recent fuzzing attempts (one
has been assigned CVE-2014-9681).
unblock procmail/3.22-24
C
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 23:41:10 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#769961: unblock android-permissions/0.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #769961,
regarding unblock android-permissions/0.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 23:45:32 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#771607: unblock: brltty/5.2~20141018-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #771607,
regarding unblock: brltty/5.2~20141018-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:40:48PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package procmail. It fixes several heap overflows
> and memory corruptions spotted in recent fu
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:40:48PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package procmail. It fixes several heap overflows
> and memory corruptions spotted in recent fu
Your message dated Tue, 17 Feb 2015 23:47:47 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#778653: unblock: procmail/3.22-24
has caused the Debian Bug report #778653,
regarding unblock: procmail/3.22-24
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 771772 - moreinfo
Bug #771772 [release.debian.org] unblock: (pre-approval)
libhibernate-validator-java/4.2.1-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
771772: http://bugs.deb
From the diff, I see that there might be a missing dependency on
bind9, cache directory not writable, default keytab file non-existent.
There are other changes but didn't read them carefully, tbh.
The changelog also seems in contradiction with the scripts since :
+ * rules, postinst: Create /va
Le 2015-02-17 23:46, Brian May a écrit :
On 18 February 2015 at 07:31, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Note that this not mean that we will accept (let's say) 1.7.5 next
time.
I assume you mean that when 1.7.5 comes out, we should make another
unblock request?
Yes. The idea is to not assume that a new
Le 2014-12-03 13:13, Ivo De Decker a écrit :
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 11:16:57AM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
% ssh coccia.debian.org dak ls bareos
bareos | 14.2.1+20141017gitc6c5b56-4 | accepted| source,
amd64
bareos | 14.2.1+20141017gitc6c5b56-4 |
Le 2015-02-18 00:35, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
Le 2014-12-10 16:19, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 2014-12-10 14:34, Pali Rohár wrote:
Please unblock package netplug
New version of netplug package (1.2.9.2-2) which is on
http://mentors.debian.org/package/netplug fix more
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:35:30 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#772727: unblock: netplug/1.2.9.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #772727,
regarding unblock: netplug/1.2.9.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:26:56 +0100
with message-id <16f64ed6d91f0106fe1f46c845b15...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#772704: unblock: systemd-cron/1.4.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #772704,
regarding unblock: systemd-cron/1.4.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:48:13 +0100
with message-id <09dc07e81092604d7b3ff33cc5e92...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#774519: unblock: netscript-2.4/5.4.8
has caused the Debian Bug report #774519,
regarding unblock: netscript-2.4/5.4.8
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:51:13 +0100
with message-id <24a21ad93da47635d9789707e8e36...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#775516: unblock: uncrustify/0.59+dfsg1-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #775516,
regarding unblock: uncrustify/0.59+dfsg1-1.1
to be marked as done.
This mea
Hi,
arm64 should be building in -5, so shouldn't the arm64 reverse
dependancies be unaffected?
Under mips, mipsel, and s390x tbb fails to build unit tests due to
missing/incorrect gcc atomics. I have very little confidence in the
functional correctness of the reverse dependencies, so I would be
inc
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Please unblock package logol
Logol package is affected by gridengine RC bug and removal request from
Jessie (gridengine is RC buggy and effectively unmaint
Hi Mehdi,
On 02/18/2015 12:20 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Evgeni, can you please tell how do you plan to fix #771870? TBH, at this
> stage, the simpler solution as far as Jessie is concerned would be to
> remove the package from Jessie for now... and work on a backport as soon
> as Jessie is release
73 matches
Mail list logo
