Your message dated Fri, 26 Dec 2014 11:51:53 +0100
with message-id <20141226105152.gb20...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#773936: unblock: biber/1.9-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #773936,
regarding unblock: biber/1.9-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Fri, 26 Dec 2014 11:53:22 +0100
with message-id <20141226105322.gc20...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#773933: unblock: async-http-client/1.6.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #773933,
regarding unblock: async-http-client/1.6.5-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi,
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo
>
> On 2014-12-24 3:25, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
>> Some time ago I uploaded python-zodb to fix RC bug #767554 but I forgot
>> to remove some headers files, sorry about that. Would it be possible to
>> upload python-zodb with
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 773852 - moreinfo
Bug #773852 [release.debian.org] unblock: zodb/1:3.9.7-5 (pre-approval)
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
773852: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 773852 unblock: zodb/1:3.9.7-5
Bug #773852 [release.debian.org] unblock: zodb/1:3.9.7-5 (pre-approval)
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: zodb/1:3.9.7-5' from 'unblock: zodb/1:3.9.7-5
(pre-approval)'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Fri, 26 Dec 2014 13:15:23 +
with message-id <886969e10960eeb7e9a7271c078f0...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#773852: unblock: zodb/1:3.9.7-5 (pre-approval)
has caused the Debian Bug report #773852,
regarding unblock: zodb/1:3.9.7-5
to be marked as done.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
please binNMU the following packages to build with binutils (>= 2.25-3).
ggcov, tulip, lush, binutils-arm-none-eabi, binutils-mingw-w64, binutils-z80,
cross-binutils, openbios, openhackware.
Hi Matthias and the release team,
On Fri, 26 Dec 2014 14:58:26 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> please binNMU the following packages to build with binutils (>= 2.25-3).
>
> ggcov, tulip, lush, binutils-arm-none-eabi, binutils-mingw-w64,
> binutils-z80, cross-binutils, openbios, openhackware.
>
>
Did the sender of these automated mails change on purpose from a role
account:
| From: Debian FTP Masters
to an address that seems to be local to franck:
> From: Archive Administrator
or was that an accident?
Regards,
-thh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.or
On 2014-12-26 14:41, Thomas Hochstein wrote:
Did the sender of these automated mails change on purpose from a role
account:
| From: Debian FTP Masters
to an address that seems to be local to franck:
From: Archive Administrator
or was that an accident?
The mails are generated by ftp-mast
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello release team,
please unblock package squidguard.
Unblock squidguard/1.5-4
The version squidguard/1.5-4 fixes one RC bug which prevents webfiltering
with squid3 because of a new r
control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Ivo,
On Donnerstag, 25. Dezember 2014, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Please go ahead and remove the moreinfo tag once the upload is in unstable.
thanks, uploaded and accepted by now.
Thanks also for unblocking d-edu-doc! :-)
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Desc
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #773908 [release.debian.org] unblock: debian-edu-config/1.815 (pre-approval)
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
773908: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773908
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Fri, 26 Dec 2014 19:39:50 +0100
with message-id <20141226183950.gb15...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#773908: unblock: debian-edu-config/1.815 (pre-approval)
has caused the Debian Bug report #773908,
regarding unblock: debian-edu-config/1.815 (pre-approval)
to be marked as d
Your message dated Fri, 26 Dec 2014 19:38:42 +0100
with message-id <20141226183842.ga15...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#773983: Unblock: squidguard/1.5-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #773983,
regarding Unblock: squidguard/1.5-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Fri, 26 Dec 2014 22:31:48 +0100
with message-id <20141226213148.ga23...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#773360: unblock: vala-mode-el/0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #773360,
regarding unblock: vala-mode-el/0.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 26 Dec 2014 22:36:25 +0100
with message-id <20141226213623.ga23...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: unblock: whois/5.2.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #773995,
regarding unblock: whois/5.2.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 02:56:09PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Please unblock package grub2
> Version -18 added a fix for #767037 (workaround for buggy EFI implementations)
> which included a new debconf template. -19 adds translations for the new
> template (including a wording fix to the E
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Simon,
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:22:08PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Julien Cristau (2014-12-15):
> > Control: tag -1 confirmed d-i
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:27:40 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > Would you be willing to let the systemd maintainers che
Control: retitle -1 unblock: dbus/1.8.12-3
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:23:45PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Julien Cristau (2014-12-15):
> > Control: tag -1 confirmed d-i
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:05:51 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> >
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Sev
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 unblock: dbus/1.8.12-3
Bug #773180 [release.debian.org] (pre-approval) unblock: dbus with #773107 fixed
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: dbus/1.8.12-3' from '(pre-approval) unblock:
dbus with #773107 fixed'
--
773180: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #773183 [release.debian.org] (pre-approval) unblock: systemd with #770504
fixed
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
773183: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773183
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Fri, 26 Dec 2014 23:13:41 +0100
with message-id <20141226221341.gd24...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#773745: unblock: postgresql-common/164
has caused the Debian Bug report #773745,
regarding unblock: postgresql-common/164
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #773865 [release.debian.org] unblock: imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-4 [security]
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
773865: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773865
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UN
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Bastien,
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Please unblock package imagemagick
>
> This fix a few security bug. Bugs are well isolated. Debdiff joined
>
> unblock imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-4
I haven't look at the debdiff (yet), but the
On 26/12/14 22:10, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Another dbus upload happened, which was unblocked by Niels, but needs an
> unblock-udeb
Thanks for flagging this. I was going to follow up to this bug when it
had aged enough that it would ordinarily have migrated; hopefully it
won't regress this time.
Th
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> The mails are generated by ftp-master, not the Release Team.
>
> The relevant change appears to be
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/mirror/dak.git/commit/?id=ec9805910965746c559dffd277e4de2dd98a6c9b
FTR I've sent them a patch to add the c
27 matches
Mail list logo
