On 03/07/14 00:53, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 July 2014 11:00:10 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
>> fcitx-qt5 and gammaray can now be binNMUed on all archs.
>>
>> pyqt5 needs to wait a little more.
>
> Full stack pushed including qtwebkit-o-s with fixed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Bug fixed in the pkg-gnustep repository.
> block 673538 with 749553
Bug #673538 [release.debian.org] transition: gnustep-base 1.24, gnustep-gui 0.22
673538 was not blocked by any bugs.
673538 was blocking: 676229
Added blocking bug(s) of 673538:
Processing control commands:
> block 751525 by -1
Bug #751525 [release.debian.org] transition: poppler 0.26
751525 was blocked by: 751432
751525 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 751525: 753575
--
751525: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751525
753575: http://bu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 753474 + pending
Bug #753474 [release.debian.org] transition: libibumad/libibmad/opensm
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
753474: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 07:56:49PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > The renaming is due to a backward-incompatible API change in
> > librime 1.0, where some struct members changed types. So I
> > followed the recommendation here.[1]
> >
> > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/TransitionBestPr
On 28/05/14 03:29, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:44:45PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> Yavor, is there any plan to do the transition? #673538 didn't look
>> like it was blocking on us.
>
> Please accept my apologies for being MIA for so long.
>
> I have the new GNUstep core pa
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 28/05/14 03:29, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > libgnustep-base1.22 -> 1.24
> > libgnustep-gui0.20 -> 0.24
>
> I have updated the tracker for that.
Thanks.
> As for libobj3 -> libobj4, there's just openvpn-auth-ldap remaining,
> which is #747989.
I'll take a look.
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 08:48:37AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 11:29:58PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > The problem is a missmatch between the jmp_buf size in perl vs. modules.
> > Aka the build against glibc 2.19 changed the public ABI of perl.
>
> Yes, jmp_buf had t
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 07:43:57PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 08:48:37AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 11:29:58PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> > > The problem is a missmatch between the jmp_buf size in perl vs. modules.
> > > Aka the build again
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Osamu Aoki
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 07:56:49PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > > The renaming is due to a backward-incompatible API change in
> > > librime 1.0, where some struct members changed types. So I
> > > followed the recommendation her
On 2014-07-03 00:39, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 13/06/14 20:41, Pino Toscano wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: block -1 by 751432
Hi,
I would like to ask a slot for a Poppler 0.26.x transition.
C
11 matches
Mail list logo