On 01/07/14 10:42, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I would like to keep openjdk-6 in unstable (with a RC issue so that it doesn't
> migrate) to prepare and test security updates.
You may want to close #720911 then.
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
On 25/06/14 20:47, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2014-06-24 10:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 14/06/14 12:11, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 13/06/14 20:41, Pino Toscano wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.or
Hi,
and sorry about the late reply.
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> Have you test-rebuilt the rdeps? Are rebuilds enough or do they need sourceful
> uploads?
You may find the buildlogs here:
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental
Curre
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I'd like to migrate libibumad and other two OFED libraries,
libibmad and opensm from experimental to unstable. The three
of them have a new soname.
See:
http://release.debian.org/t
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #753474 [release.debian.org] transition: libibumad/libibmad/opensm
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
753474: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753474
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBS
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Ana!
On 02/07/14 11:24, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
>
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to migrate libibumad and other two OFED libraries,
> libibmad and opensm
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:13:40 +0200
with message-id <53b3db54.4000...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#736150: transition: libexosip2
has caused the Debian Bug report #736150,
regarding transition: libexosip2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:12:26 +0200
with message-id <53b3db0a.2010...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#745273: transition: libccrtp
has caused the Debian Bug report #745273,
regarding transition: libccrtp
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 02/07/14 11:19, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> and sorry about the late reply.
>
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> Have you test-rebuilt the rdeps? Are rebuilds enough or do they need
>> sourceful
>> uploads?
>
> You may find
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #752999 [release.debian.org] transition: libass
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
752999: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752999
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 16:47:27 +0200
Ricardo Mones wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 04:32:30PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 09/06/14 15:44, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 02:38:47AM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> > >> Hi Emilio,
> > >>
> > >> On
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> Great. xbmc build-depends on libass but doesn't depend on it, so it won't need
> any binnmus / is not really affected. Please go ahead with this.
Uploaded, thanks.
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Develo
On 02/07/14 12:48, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 16:47:27 +0200
> Ricardo Mones wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 04:32:30PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 09/06/14 15:44, Ricardo Mones wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 02:38:47AM +0200, Ricardo Mones
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # as requested by RT in <53b3f75e.7060...@debian.org>
> block 747534 with 753488
Bug #747534 [release.debian.org] transition: libetpan
747534 was blocked by: 751171
747534 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 747534: 753488
> thanks
On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 14:13:18 +0200
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> So, can you file a bug for the bd-uninst issue on cairo-dock-plug-ins and
> make it block this bug?
Done, thanks for the quick response! :)
--
Ricardo Mones
http://people.debian.org/~mones
«When the going gets weird, the we
fcitx-qt5 and gammaray can now be binNMUed on all archs.
pyqt5 needs to wait a little more.
--
Hiroshima '45,
Chernobyl '86,
Windows '95.
Grafitti en Niceto Vega 5940, Buenos Aires. De una foto de Mario Gallo.
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.bl
On 02/07/14 16:00, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> fcitx-qt5 and gammaray can now be binNMUed on all archs.
Done.
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
as briefly discussed on #debian-release. Please remove this package
in the 6.0.10 point release. It's not covered by squeeze-lts support
and debian-security-support marks existing packages as
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
as briefly discussed on #debian-release. Please remove this package
in the 6.0.10 point release. It's not covered by squeeze-lts support
and debian-security-support marks existing packages as
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
as briefly discussed on #debian-release. Please remove this package
in the 6.0.10 point release. It's not covered by squeeze-lts support
and debian-security-support marks existing packages as
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
as briefly discussed on #debian-release. Please remove this package
in the 6.0.10 point release. It's not covered by squeeze-lts support
and debian-security-support marks existing packages as
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
as briefly discussed on #debian-release. Please remove this package
in the 6.0.10 point release. It's not covered by squeeze-lts support
and debian-security-support marks existing packages as
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
as briefly discussed on #debian-release. Please remove this package
in the 6.0.10 point release. It's not covered by squeeze-lts support
and debian-security-support marks existing packages as
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
as briefly discussed on #debian-release. Please remove this package
in the 6.0.10 point release. It's not covered by squeeze-lts support
and debian-security-support marks existing packages as
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
as briefly discussed on #debian-release. Please remove this package
in the 6.0.10 point release. It's not covered by squeeze-lts support
and debian-security-support marks existing packages as
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
as briefly discussed on #debian-release. Please remove this package
in the 6.0.10 point release. It's not covered by squeeze-lts support
and debian-security-support marks existing packages as
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
as briefly discussed on #debian-release. Please remove this package
in the 6.0.10 point release. It's not covered by squeeze-lts support
and debian-security-support marks existing packages as
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
as briefly discussed on #debian-release. Please remove this package
in the 6.0.10 point release. It's not covered by squeeze-lts support
and debian-security-support marks existing packages as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 753494 + squeeze
Bug #753494 [release.debian.org] RM: gksu-polkit
On 01/07/14 14:24, Guo Yixuan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>>
>> On 29/06/14 19:31, Guo Yixuan wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Niels Thykier
> wrote:
On 2014-06-29 05:34, Guo Yixuan (郭溢譞) wrote:
> Package: release.debian
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 739385
Bug #752999 [release.debian.org] transition: libass
752999 was not blocked by any bugs.
752999 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 752999: 739385
> tags -1 pending
Bug #752999 [release.debian.org] transition: libass
Added tag(s) pen
Control: block -1 by 739385
Control: tags -1 pending
On 02/07/14 12:46, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> Great. xbmc build-depends on libass but doesn't depend on it, so it won't
>> need
>> any binnmus / is not really affected. Please g
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
We'd like to get Perl 5.20 in jessie, so I guess it's best to push this
on the radar now.
Things aren't nearly ready yet, but most of the known blockers should
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/perl5.20.html
Bug #753529 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.20
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/perl5.20.html'.
--
753529: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/perl5.20.html
On 02/07/14 21:17, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
>
> We'd like to get Perl 5.20 in je
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #751525 [release.debian.org] transition: poppler 0.26
Added tag(s) pending.
--
751525: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751525
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Control: tags -1 pending
On 13/06/14 20:41, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Control: block -1 by 751432
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask a slot for a Poppler 0.26.x transition.
> Currently
On Wednesday 02 July 2014 11:00:10 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> fcitx-qt5 and gammaray can now be binNMUed on all archs.
>
> pyqt5 needs to wait a little more.
Full stack pushed including qtwebkit-o-s with fixed symbols. pyqt5 should be
binNMUable.
--
En 1975, a los 99 años, mu
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> On 01/07/14 14:24, Guo Yixuan wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 29/06/14 19:31, Guo Yixuan wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Niels Thykier
> >
39 matches
Mail list logo
