On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> #678383 [pixelmed]: pixelmed: FTBFS with Java7 (uses internal Java API)
Would it be possible to filter out (in the future?) any bugs that are
marked as pending ? I have no control on this process.
Thanks,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On Sunday 30 June 2013 11:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> +multipath-tools (0.4.9+git0.4dfdaf2b-7+stable1) stable-proposed-updates;
> urgency=low
>
> That version number won't work, for a couple of reasons - not least
> because it's _higher_ than the version you uploaded to unstable.
>
> Please us
On 2013-07-01 09:05, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> #678383 [pixelmed]: pixelmed: FTBFS with Java7 (uses internal Java API)
>
> Would it be possible to filter out (in the future?) any bugs that are
> marked as pending ? I have no control on th
On 2013-07-01 08:21, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks a lot for this work.
>
> On 30/06/13 at 23:32 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
>> they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
>> found in the attache
Hi,
yesterday Aurelian Jarno did switch the GCC default to 4.8 in the VCS. However I
don't see him in the Debian GCC maintainer list as GCC port maintainer. In the
past I only did see s390 contributions and s390 related bug triage from Bastian
Blank. Is this change coordinated with Bastian? Ple
On 2013-07-01 09:14, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Sunday 30 June 2013 11:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> +multipath-tools (0.4.9+git0.4dfdaf2b-7+stable1) stable-proposed-updates;
>> urgency=low
>>
>> That version number won't work, for a couple of reasons - not least
>> because it's _higher_ tha
There is a fix for rrep but it is waiting for sponsorship (#702588).
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org
Hi,
Quoting Lucas Nussbaum (2013-07-01 08:21:30)
> Currently, the following criterias are used:
> | Key packages are:
> | - packages whose popcon is higher than 5% of the max popcon (that's
> | >7570 insts currently)
> | OR
> | - packages of priority >= standard
> | OR
> | - packages of section
On 01/07/13 at 15:00 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Lucas Nussbaum (2013-07-01 08:21:30)
> > Currently, the following criterias are used:
> > | Key packages are:
> > | - packages whose popcon is higher than 5% of the max popcon (that's
> > | >7570 insts currently)
> > | OR
> >
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-CC: 714...@bugs.debian.org
ghostscript from wheezy shipped with a regression (#714247) that causes
an infinite loop with some files. I would like to get this fixed in the
next point rel
Control: tags -1 + wheezy moreinfo
On 2013-07-01 15:02, Paul Wise wrote:
ghostscript from wheezy shipped with a regression (#714247) that
causes
an infinite loop with some files. I would like to get this fixed in
the
next point release. I have attached a debdiff that I have tested and
fixes th
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + wheezy moreinfo
Bug #714639 [release.debian.org] pu: package ghostscript/9.05~dfsg-6.3
Added tag(s) wheezy and moreinfo.
--
714639: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714639
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 15:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> ghostscript currently has the same version in wheezy, jessie and sid;
> is there a plan for getting sid fixed?
I expect the maintainers intend to upload the new upstream 9.07 soon, it
contains the patch. CCing the maintainers to find ou
2013/6/29 Adam D. Barratt :
> grub2 (1.99-27.1) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> Hmmm, this looks to have been based on the wrong version? wheezy has
> 1.99-27+deb7u1 currently.
Yeah, sorry. The wheezy branch in our bazaar repo was tracking the
wrong version.
Here's a fixed diff.
--
Robert Millan
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Bug #714324 [release.debian.org] pu: package grub2/1.99-27.1+deb7u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #714324 [release.debian.org] pu: package grub2/1.99-27.1+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
714324: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 19:39 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2013/6/29 Adam D. Barratt :
> > grub2 (1.99-27.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> >
> > Hmmm, this looks to have been based on the wrong version? wheezy has
> > 1.99-27+deb7u1 currently.
>
> Yeah, sorry. T
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 11:42:44AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Is this change coordinated with Bastian?
I have not been contacted by Aurelian. I've not seen anything on this
matter from him.
Bastian
--
A Vulcan can no sooner be disloyal than he can exist without breathing.
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 09:35:29PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 11:42:44AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Is this change coordinated with Bastian?
>
> I have not been contacted by Aurelian. I've not seen anything on this
> matter from him.
>
I did discuss that
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:48:39PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 02:51:43PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > GCC 4.8 is now the default on all x86 architectures, and on all ARM
> > architectures (the latter confirmed by the Debian ARM porters).
Please change the default for
2013/7/1 Adam D. Barratt :
> Thanks; please go ahead.
Uploaded. Thank you.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXNx3Ep-6SFpYHke=
20 matches
Mail list logo
