Re: Bug reported on 2.2.1-8+deb7u1 (scheduled for (old)stable releases)

On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 08:34:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [Mail-Followup-To overridden, as iirc you're not reading -release] > > On 2013-06-15 20:11, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: > >Dear SRM, I have just received this [1] bug report. I'm AFK this > >weekend, don't know if I would be ab

Re: Current and upcoming toolchain changes for jessie

Am 15.06.2013 03:22, schrieb Stephan Schreiber: > GCC-4.8 should become the default on ia64 soon; some other changes are > desirable: > - The transition of gcc-4.8/libgcc1 to libunwind8. > - A removal of the libunwind7 dependency of around 4600 packages on ia64 - > when > they are updated next ti

Re: Why does libgeotiff-dev depend on libtiff5-dev ?

"Francesco P. Lovergine" wrote: > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:00:26PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: >> I'm unfamiliar with the history of libtiff4 / tiff5, but libgd-dev >> depends on libtiff-dev ; >> can anyone answer: >> (1) why does libgeotiff-dev depend on libtiff5-dev? > > Because it needs

Re: Why does libgeotiff-dev depend on libtiff5-dev ?

Hi Jay, On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:18:05AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > The release team has not yet found the time to reply to my message of > May 6 on when they will be ready to think about the tiff transition or > whether my plans for the transition are okay. (It is not my intention > to be

Re: Bug reported on 2.2.1-8+deb7u1 (scheduled for (old)stable releases)

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:26:10AM +0200, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 08:34:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > [Mail-Followup-To overridden, as iirc you're not reading -release] > > > > On 2013-06-15 20:11, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: > > >Dear SRM, I have jus

Re: Dropping kfreebsd-8?

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:00:45AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 16/06/13 19:57, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > Wheezy has both kfreebsd-8 and kfreebsd-9. Shouldn't kfreebsd-8 be dropped > > now? > > Some other things I'm wondering about are: > > stable updates - would we need to keep kfre

Re: Bug reported on 2.2.1-8+deb7u1 (scheduled for (old)stable releases)

On 2013-06-17 17:22, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:26:10AM +0200, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 08:34:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > If the report does transpire to be accurate then we can look at > releasing a fix via stable-updates i

Bug#712597: pu: package libmodule-signature-perl/0.68-1+deb7u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi Stable Release Managers libmodule-signature-perl/0.73-1 fixed CVE-2013-2145 see #711239 for the corresponding Debian bugreport. Would it be possible to have libmodule-signature-perl also upda

Bug#712604: nmu: python-scientific_2.9.2-4

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hello It seems that with the latest python the extensions are expected to be under /usr/lib/python2.x/site-package//gnukfreebsd9 instead of gnukfreebsd8 (when the package was uploaded) the

Bug#706142: pu: telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1

On 16/06/13 19:11, Adam D. Barratt wrote:> On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 14:10 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: >> Assuming my backport gets accepted into wheezy-backports, does the >> attached debdiff look OK? > > Yes, thanks. Uploaded. S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debia

Bug#712615: transition: perl 5.18

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear release team, As discussed briefly in the thread starting at , now seems like a good time to get the perl 5.18 transiti

Processed: block 712615 with 707406 708841 708572 709047 709048 676274 708025 708596 708839 709668 705364 707502

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 712615 with 707406 708841 708572 709047 709048 676274 708025 708596 > 708839 709668 705364 707502 Bug #712615 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.18 712615 was not blocked by any bugs. 712615 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bu

Bug#712622: pu: package wv2/0.4.2.dfsg.1-9.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: serious User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu README.Debian says that src/generator/generator_wword{6,8}.htm have been removed from the repacked wv2_0.4.2.dfsg.1.orig.tar.bz2, but they are still present. These two files are based on docume

Bug#712623: opu: package wv2/0.4.2.dfsg.1-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: serious User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: opu README.Debian says that src/generator/generator_wword{6,8}.htm have been removed from the repacked wv2_0.4.2.dfsg.1.orig.tar.bz2, but they are still present. These two files are based on docum

Processed: block 708536 with 711761

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 708536 with 711761 Bug #708536 [release.debian.org] transition: python3-defaults (add python3.3 to supported python3) 708536 was blocked by: 712014 711926 707315 708011 708536 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 708536: 7117

Processed: block 708536 with 692381

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 708536 with 692381 Bug #708536 [release.debian.org] transition: python3-defaults (add python3.3 to supported python3) 708536 was blocked by: 711926 712014 708011 707315 711761 708536 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 70853