Bug#661958: Reboot Apache2 2.4 transition

Hi, would the Release Team be comfortable with an upload of Apache 2.4 to Sid on May, 20? That's a bit sooner than I expected, but on the other hand there is not much to gain to wait longer. We made good progress with our list of critical reverse dependencies so that only one is missing. Hence I

Processed: tagging 708092

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 708092 + pending Bug #708092 [release.debian.org] transition: eglibc Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 708092: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708092 Debia

Bug#661958: Bug#707024: Bug#661958: Reboot Apache2 2.4 transition

I can ack that PHP 5.5 RC1 is prepared to enter the unstable. This will also trigger the libgd and php5.5 transitions. O. On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Arno Töll wrote: > Hi, > > would the Release Team be comfortable with an upload of Apache 2.4 to > Sid on May, 20? That's a bit sooner than

Processed: bug 708092 is forwarded to http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libc2.17.html

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 708092 http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libc2.17.html Bug #708092 [release.debian.org] transition: eglibc Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libc2.17.html'. > thanks Stopping processing

Temporary solution for changelog problem in binNMUs

Hi, with wheezy released and development on jessie started the problem with binNMUs for multiarch-enabled packages is back: binNMU'ed packages have different changelog entries and upgrades fail (for example [1]). [1] It's quite annoying as the problem is only de

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 708109 by 704032 Bug #708109 [orthanc] 0.5.2 is out ! 708109 was not blocked by any bugs. 708109 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 708109: 704032 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 695826 by 704032 Bug #695826 [libboost1.49-dev] libboost1.49-dev: unable to compile applicatios using boost_thread 695826 was not blocked by any bugs. 695826 was blocking: 701310 701318 701374 Added blocking bug(s) of 695826: 704032 > thank

Bug#708114: pu: package empathy/3.4.2.3-2+deb7u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: wheezy User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Empathy currently crashes when a Google Talk user tries to edit their account details, due to poor handling of new fields provided by the server. The bug is http://bugs.debian.org/70

Re: Temporary solution for changelog problem in binNMUs

Hi! On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 11:14:07 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > There have been previous discussions how to fix this[2]. The dpkg > maintainers would like to treat changelogs and copyright files as > metadata and move them out of /usr/share/doc[3]. > > [2]

Re: Temporary solution for changelog problem in binNMUs

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 15:16:57 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > I've mentioned this before, I find this completely unsatisfactory, > because (at least): > > 1) the changelog stops representing the actual changelog of the > package. Irrelevant, that's already the case today for anything but t

Bug#708146: nmu: unscd_0.48-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu unscd_0.48-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against eglibc major version 2.17" Hi, for FusionForge I’m using unscd instead of nscd, which makes much less trouble. It needs to be binNMU’d against e

Bug#667906: transition: libffi6

Hi, just wondering if we can help with the Debian side of this transition. I guess that all Haskell packages need to be rebuild in unstable. If you want, I can schedule the binNMUs and take care of any build failures. Or are you waiting with rebuilding Haskell for a reason? Greetings, Joachim -

Bug#708146: marked as done (nmu: unscd_0.48-2)

Your message dated Mon, 13 May 2013 17:16:39 +0200 with message-id <20130513151639.gz12...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#708146: nmu: unscd_0.48-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #708146, regarding nmu: unscd_0.48-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#667906: transition: libffi6

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 17:18:17 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi, > > just wondering if we can help with the Debian side of this transition. I > guess that all Haskell packages need to be rebuild in unstable. If you > want, I can schedule the binNMUs and take care of any build failures. Or >

Bug#704566: unblock: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u4

Hello I have been wondering how it comes i have an isc-dhcp-client installed not available on mirrors. Obvisouly i am helpful user helping with testing uploaded packages. ;) > If so, should the version be +deb70u5 or +deb70u6? Since today is monday and therfor i might have a wish for free. Plea

Re: Temporary solution for changelog problem in binNMUs

Guillem Jover writes ("Re: Temporary solution for changelog problem in binNMUs"): > dpkg supports --control-show and --control-list (already in wheezy), which > can be used for stuff like: > $ dpkg-query --control-show dpkg changelog > for installed packages, for example. Or: > $ dpkg-deb --in

Bug#704566: unblock: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u4

[it helps if you don't drop the submitter from the recipients...] On 2013-05-13 16:37, Thilo Six wrote: I have been wondering how it comes i have an isc-dhcp-client installed not available on mirrors. Obvisouly i am helpful user helping with testing uploaded packages. ;) If so, should the

Re: Temporary solution for changelog problem in binNMUs

On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 17:04:51 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > The real problem is that these changelog files are primarily intended > for human beings. They should live in /usr/share/doc, and their > location should be transparent. The fact that parts of it might be mostly consumable by human beings

Re: Temporary solution for changelog problem in binNMUs

Hi, Ian Jackson wrote: > The real problem is that these changelog files are primarily intended > for human beings. They should live in /usr/share/doc, and their > location should be transparent. I was convinced of this until I remembered that package descriptions are very similar in this respec

Bug#708114: pu: package empathy/3.4.2.3-2+deb7u1

Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 10:34 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Empathy currently crashes when a Google Talk user tries to edit their > account details, due to poor handling of new fields provided by the server. > The bug is http://bugs.debian.org/706900, reported as grave

Processed: Re: Bug#708114: pu: package empathy/3.4.2.3-2+deb7u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #708114 [release.debian.org] pu: package empathy/3.4.2.3-2+deb7u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 708114: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708114 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUB

Re: Temporary solution for changelog problem in binNMUs

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 13:14:51 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > One problem that that doesn't solve is what to do when a package would > be able to borrow its /doc/ directory from another package > (using a symlink) but for the changelog and copyright (which gets even > harder when binnmus are in

asic-technologies.com

We make ASIC Bitcoin Mining Gear using the ASIC chips Sourced from Taiwan. 3.1 -3.3 GHash/sec 4 Board (has 32 chips) - 10 BTC - $1000 USD 9.3-9.9 GHash/sec 12 Board (has 96 chips) - 25 BTC $2500 USD Each module board uses about 39 Watts of power. Large 12 board with 2 power packs. Mining board

Re: Temporary solution for changelog problem in binNMUs

Jonathan Nieder writes ("Re: Temporary solution for changelog problem in binNMUs"): > I was convinced of this until I remembered that package descriptions > are very similar in this respect. My gut feeling to expect to find > changelogs in /usr/share/doc/ is actually mostly due to > habit, I susp

Bug#704833: marked as done ((pre-approval) unblock: virtuoso-opensource/6.1.4+dfsg1-7)

Your message dated Tue, 14 May 2013 04:18:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#704833: fixed in mozc 1.6.1187.102-1~exp3 has caused the Debian Bug report #704833, regarding (pre-approval) unblock: virtuoso-opensource/6.1.4+dfsg1-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#704833: marked as done ((pre-approval) unblock: virtuoso-opensource/6.1.4+dfsg1-7)

reopen 704833 thanks Sorry, I was mistaken in the BTS number. I reopen. Best regards, Nobuhiro 2013/4/18 Debian Bug Tracking System : > Your message dated Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:42:00 +0100 > with message-id > and subject line Re: Bug#704833: Ping > has caused the Debian Bug report #704833, > re

Processed: Re: Bug#704833: marked as done ((pre-approval) unblock: virtuoso-opensource/6.1.4+dfsg1-7)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 704833 Bug #704833 {Done: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu } [release.debian.org] (pre-approval) unblock: virtuoso-opensource/6.1.4+dfsg1-7 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and y

Processed: closing 704833

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Re-close incorrectly re-opened bug > close 704833 Bug #704833 [release.debian.org] (pre-approval) unblock: virtuoso-opensource/6.1.4+dfsg1-7 Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 70

Bug#708208: nmu: minetest_0.4.6+repack-6

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule a binNMU for minetest on armel and mips. It's the last package depending on libirrlicht1.7a (changed soname to libirrlicht1.8). nmu minetest_0.4.6+repack-6 . armel mips . -m