Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 706488 + wheezy
Bug #706488 [release.debian.org] RM: boinc-server-maker/7.0.27
Added tag(s) wheezy.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
706488: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 05:07:13PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> So, release people: How likely is it that Hurd gets added to jessie?
> Within the next one or two months I mean, not "maybe in a years
> time". :)
>
I don't see it happening, to be honest.
Neil
--
signature.asc
Description: Digi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi RT,
I'd like to upload a stable +deb7u2 for gcc-msp430.
This is the fix for #706482 which was not closed with +deb7u1 due to short
timing before
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 2013-05-05 14:17, Ondřej Surý wrote:
$ diffstat php5_5.4.4-16.debdiff
-16 doesn't work as a version number for this I'm afraid. Testing and
unstable have -15, stable -14; please use -14+deb7u1.
Please could we have a copy of the proposed debdiff, rather than
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #706848 [release.debian.org] pu: package php5/5.4.4-16
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
706848: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706848
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Control: tags -1 + confirmed squeeze
On 2013-05-06 12:05, Luca BRUNO wrote:
I'd like to upload a stable +deb7u2 for gcc-msp430.
This is the fix for #706482 which was not closed with +deb7u1 due to
short
timing before the release. This revision reverts the previous
doc-only change
and cherry-p
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed squeeze
Bug #706937 [release.debian.org] pu: package
gcc-msp430/4.6.3~mspgcc-20120406-3+deb7u2
Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed.
--
706937: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706937
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.
Congratulations on getting Wheezy out the door!
Wasting no time, I'd like to remind the release team that I'm really
hoping Jessie will ship with only one version of the tiff library:
version 4.x at whatever version is current at the time of the freeze for
Jessie. Getting everyone over to tiff 4.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 706848 + wheezy
Bug #706848 [release.debian.org] pu: package php5/5.4.4-16
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #706848 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
706848:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Oops finger memory
> tags 706937 - squeeze + wheezy
Bug #706937 [release.debian.org] pu: package
gcc-msp430/4.6.3~mspgcc-20120406-3+deb7u2
Removed tag(s) squeeze.
Bug #706937 [release.debian.org] pu: package
gcc-msp430/4.6.3~mspgcc-20120406-3+
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #706806 [release.debian.org] pu: package xorg/1:7.7+3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
706806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706806
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On 2013-05-05 8:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
the vmware folks requested the addition of xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse
to
xserver-xorg-input-all's dependencies, which rather makes sense.
I've
done that in 1:7.7+3, but that should ideally be done for wheezy as
well.
Ass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, I have been significantly out of the loop for a while now but what do you
base that on?
What requirements are we still falling short on?
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
On 5/6/2013 7:08 AM, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 05:07:13PM +020
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I would like to request a slot for a small libattica 0.4.x transition.
The newer attica source is already in experimental, and the transition
affects just few (KDE-related) source
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I would like to upgrade audit to the last version in unstable.
This require a transition of the libaudit0 library to libaudit1.
I just tried to rebuild xorg with the latest version
Laurent Bigonville (06/05/2013):
> I just tried to rebuild xorg with the latest version and the build was
> successful, I didn't try the other rdeps yet.
Whether it also starts successfully would be a good thing to check.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 706937 - squeeze + wheezy
Bug #706937 [release.debian.org] pu: package
gcc-msp430/4.6.3~mspgcc-20120406-3+deb7u2
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #706937 to the same tags previously set
Bug #706937 [release.debian.org] pu: package
gcc-
Dear Release team,
In this thread:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2013/05/msg2.html
we have been discussing how we could have cloud-init in the Debian cloud
images.
One solution is to enable wheezy-backports by default in the images.
Though there are some concerns that we shouldn't do
On 05/05/13 16:07, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> ...released together
> with all the others (probably as a technology preview)...
> So, release people: How likely is it that Hurd gets added to jessie?
If added as a 'technology preview', what does that mean exactly?
Would Hurd-specific RC-severity bug
Am 06.05.2013 08:25, schrieb Ondřej Surý:
> BTW do you have any information on db 6.x? I haven't seen any nor I
> have been able to find any information about it.
see http://bugs.python.org/issue17477
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
If the information is true then I don't mind waiting couple of months for BDB
6. I just wish Berkeley DB was acquired by some more open company :-/.
The new major version number is also often a culprit for breakages, although I
think I have fixed most if not all of them in 4->5 transition.
Ondř
Package: release.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #706848
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello Adam,
version number changed to -14+deb7u1 (and merged changelogs for -15
and -16 releases).
$ diffstat php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u1.debdiff
debian/patches/CVE-2013-1643.patch
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 667906 http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libffi.html
Bug #667906 [release.debian.org] transition: libffi6
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libffi.html'.
> forwarded 669348 http://relea
Hi,
On 06/05/13 15:25, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed squeeze
Isn't this targetting wheezy?
> On 2013-05-06 12:05, Luca BRUNO wrote:
>> I'd like to upload a stable +deb7u2 for gcc-msp430.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
On 06/05/13 19:41, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 06/05/13 15:25, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 + confirmed squeeze
>
> Isn't this targetting wheezy?
Oh sorry, I see there was already a followup to control@
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
>> with all the others (probably as a technology preview)...
>> So, release people: How likely is it that Hurd gets added to jessie?
> If added as a 'technology preview', what does that mean exactly?
Note that the tech preview was a softening of a requirement to get added
to wheezy. Which didn
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 677800 http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libgnokii7.html
Bug #677800 [release.debian.org] transition: libgnokii7
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libgnokii7.html'.
> forwarded 678569 h
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 706971 http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/attica.html
Bug #706971 [release.debian.org] transition: attica 0.4
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/attica.html'.
> thanks
Stopping processing
On 06/05/13 20:27, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Adding it and then keeping it out of the usual migration rules is asking
> for failure from the beginning, accumulating cruft. Not a way to go, IMO.
In that case would there be 150-200 RC-severity bugs introduced right
away by its inclusion? (Packages whi
Neil McGovern, le Mon 06 May 2013 17:15:45 +0100, a écrit :
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 09:36:55AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > OK, I have been significantly out of the loop for a while now but what
> > do you base that on?
> >
> > What requirements are we
Joerg Jaspert, le Mon 06 May 2013 21:27:46 +0200, a écrit :
> Adding it and then keeping it out of the usual migration rules is asking
> for failure from the beginning, accumulating cruft. Not a way to go, IMO.
Excluding from the migration rules would probably become a headache,
yes. But wouldn't
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 706814 http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/xfce4.10.html
Bug #706814 [release.debian.org] Xfce 4.10 transition
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/xfce4.10.html'.
> forwarded 706798 http://
Steven Chamberlain, le Mon 06 May 2013 21:20:57 +0100, a écrit :
> On 06/05/13 20:27, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Adding it and then keeping it out of the usual migration rules is asking
> > for failure from the beginning, accumulating cruft. Not a way to go, IMO.
>
> In that case would there be 150-
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 14:57:38 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> is_good = .depends ~ /libgd2-3/;
Why is the package name not libgd3, if the SONAME is libgd.so.3?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 706828 http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libgd2.html
Bug #706828 [release.debian.org] transition: libgd2
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libgd2.html'.
> thanks
Stopping processing her
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #670902 [release.debian.org] transition: hsqldb 2.2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
670902: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670902
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 09:56:39 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Right now he have the following situation ragarding hsqldb in Debian
> - "hsqldb" is 1.8.x, long obsolete version but still needed by LO
> - hsqldb2.0 in experimental (RM bug #670885 filed, should be remov
Hi Samuel,
On 06/05/13 21:35, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain, le Mon 06 May 2013 21:20:57 +0100, a écrit :
>> In that case would there be 150-200 RC-severity bugs introduced right
>> away by its inclusion?
>
> I would rather say simply dropping them, as already requested in
> Bug#704
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 14:57:38 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
>> is_good = .depends ~ /libgd2-3/;
>
> Why is the package name not libgd3, if the SONAME is libgd.so.3?
Upstream policy is to keep API stable for (=2) releases, so it
seemed to
Steven Chamberlain, le Mon 06 May 2013 21:47:00 +0100, a écrit :
> On 06/05/13 21:35, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Steven Chamberlain, le Mon 06 May 2013 21:20:57 +0100, a écrit :
> >> In that case would there be 150-200 RC-severity bugs introduced right
> >> away by its inclusion?
> >
> > I would r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 706830 http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/php5.5.html
Bug #706830 [release.debian.org] transition: php5 5.5
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/php5.5.html'.
> forwarded 706866 http://rele
Hi release team,
I like to get your opinion and advise on the following.
Motif has been released with a free license last year, and I would like
to move it from non-free (called openmotif) to Debian main. Its former
free replacement lesstif2 is unsupported upstream and should be retired
(in Debia
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu batmand_0.3.2-13 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in a clean Debian sid environment."
batmand/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libc6 (>= 2.15)
The first package post-freeze I noticed that was not buil
tag 670902 - moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:39:13PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> So I didn't see anywhere in this bug report a list of binary packages
> that go away and binary packages that replace them, and a description
> of how we figure out which packages are affected / need a r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 670902 - moreinfo
Bug #670902 [release.debian.org] transition: hsqldb 2.2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
670902: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=67090
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu cvsgraph_1.7.0-2 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in a clean sid environment."
cvsgraph/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libgd2-3 (>= 2.1.0~alpha~)
... and number 2 ... :-)
Looks like it was built in
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 11:11:54PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu cvsgraph_1.7.0-2 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in a clean sid environment."
>
> cvsgraph/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 18:12:56 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Now that Wheezy is ehrm virtually released ..., we'd like to reboot the
> Apache 2.4 transition process as soon as possible. In other words, we'd
> like to break Sid - as far as Apache is involved - in a foreseeable
> future
Your message dated Mon, 6 May 2013 22:40:11 +0100
with message-id <20130506214011.gi7...@sirena.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#707012: nmu: cvsgraph_1.7.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #707012,
regarding nmu: cvsgraph_1.7.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Hi,
On 06.05.2013 23:28, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Are there bugs filed for all reverse deps that need source changes for
> apache 2.4? Can you set them as blocking this (#661958) bug?
yes, they are. They are all noted in [1]. I also sent a BTS command of
hell which should do so.
[1]
http://bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 661958 with 666794 666797 666805 666829 666836 666846 666863 666799
> 666800 666801 666802 666807 666817 666820 666830 666840 666842 666848 666853
> 666855 666856 666859 666860 666796 666804 666806 666809 666810 666811 666813
> 666814 666
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 661958 with 669729 669733 669734 669735 669736 669737 669738 669739
> 669740 669741 669742 669743 669745 669746 669747 669748 669749 669750 669751
> 669752 669754 669755 669757 669759 669761 669762 669763 669764 669767 669768
> 669769 669
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi
We have a new set of by KDE prepared in experimental as much as
aptitude has allowed us.
We would love to bring it to unstable whenever it fits you. We can bring
it in as one big bl
I am requesting a transition from libarchive12 to libarchive13. libarchive13
is from the latest release of libarchive (3.1.2). A soname bump was done
upstream due to some ABI changes, specifically with HFS support.
I notice the most recent experimental upload FTBFS on many architectures
with
Oops, meant to reply all.
On May 6, 2013 8:17 PM, "Andres Mejia" wrote:
> Yes, I plan on disabling lrzip support for now.
> On May 6, 2013 7:55 PM, "peter green" wrote:
>
>>
>>> I am requesting a transition from libarchive12 to libarchive13.
>>> libarchive13
>>> is from the latest release of lib
Forwarding reply to my query to the bug report.
Original Message
Subject:re: Bug#706866: transition: libarchive
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 20:17:37 -0400
From: Andres Mejia
To: peter green
References: <518842df.1000...@p10link.net>
Yes, I plan on disabling l
I would like to openconnect 4.99 and network-manager-openconnect
0.9.8.0 to unstable this week. This is the complete set of source
packages involved in this transition. Ok to proceed?
Thanks,
--
mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
On Monday 06 May 2013 23:07:31 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu batmand_0.3.2-13 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in a clean Debian sid
> environment."
>
> batmand/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: l
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2013 08:54:03 +0200
with message-id <1862251.EZDUDgzp8l@sven-desktop>
and subject line Re: Bug#707011: nmu: batmand_0.3.2-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #707011,
regarding nmu: batmand_0.3.2-13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
59 matches
Mail list logo
