Hi Steffen,
On Tue, April 30, 2013 22:07, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> The PHP code shipping with the BOINC Server Maker package was not updated
> for a long time because of the freeze coinciding with the general overhaul
> the BOINC package structure. An important security update was missed.
>
> The
I looked around but could not find the most prominent report that once made it into German local TV. Maybe someone else can help out.
Our later BOINC packages do not build the boinc-server-maker package any more. Respective (updated) experimental bits go into .. experimental.
Steffen
--
Hi,
These missed server issues were presumably what's now CVE-2013-2018:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.oss.general/10083
- Alyssa
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Ar
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package httrack from sid to testing/wheezy, or block current
testing/wheezy version if this is too late (which is something I am fearing)
As reminder, httrack is a website c
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #706546 [release.debian.org] unblock: httrack/3.47.9-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
706546: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706546
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
On 2013-05-01 13:41, Xavier Roche wrote:
Please unblock package httrack from sid to testing/wheezy, or block
current testing/wheezy version if this is too late (which is
something
I am fearing)
What do you mean by "block [the] current testing/wheezy version"?
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu scribus_1.4.2.dfsg+r18267-1 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in a clean Debian sid
environment."
Once again a package built on ??? was uploaded to sid:
scribus/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libpod
Le 01/05/2013 14:54, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> What do you mean by "block [the] current testing/wheezy version"?
> (Removal?)
No, move the old package (3.43.9-1) in wheezy - not sure this is
possible either considering the late date.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.de
On Wed, May 1, 2013 12:17, Alyssa Milburn wrote:
> These missed server issues were presumably what's now CVE-2013-2018:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.oss.general/10083
Thanks, noted.
Thijs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51812c3b.4030...@httrack.com
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #706546 [release.debian.org] unblock: httrack/3.47.9-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
706546: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706546
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On 2013-05-01 14:48, Xavier Roche wrote:
Le 01/05/2013 14:54, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
What do you mean by "block [the] current testing/wheezy version"?
(Removal?)
No, move the old package (3.43.9-1) in wheezy - not sure this is
possible either considering the late date.
That's not really p
Le 01/05/2013 17:01, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> That's not really practical at this point, no.
Yep, seems logical.
Then we can either let the 3.46.1-1 release (and have an update later -
in such case please close this ticket) or unblock 3.47.7-1 when possible.
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Your message dated Wed, 01 May 2013 19:43:42 +0100
with message-id <1367433822.28602.5.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#691988: Re: Bug#691988: pre-approve unblock:
libpam-ssh/1.92-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #691988,
regarding unblock: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
to b
On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 15:58 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 16:25 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > but I think it's something that should seriously be
> > considered. Otherwise Ekiga should be considered from removal from
> > wheezy, as there is no way security patches can be
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 706380 = pu
retitle 706380 pu: clutter-gst/1.5.4-1+build1
thanks
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 14:17 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Please unblock package clutter-gst
>
> No-change rebuild to clear binNMU state and restore multiarch
> co-installabili
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 706386 + pu
retitle 706386 pu: lua-sql/2.3.0-1+build1~deb7u1
thanks
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 15:17 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Please unblock package lua-sql
>
> No-change rebuild to clear binNMU state and restore multiarch
> co-installabilit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
> usertags 706387 + pu
Usertags were: unblock.
Usertags are now: unblock pu.
> retitle 706387 pu: myodbc/5.1.10-2+b
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 706387 + pu
retitle 706387 pu: myodbc/5.1.10-2+build1~deb7u1 (?)
thanks
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 15:29 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Please unblock package myodbc
>
> No-change rebuild to clear binNMU state and restore multiarch
> co-installabi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
> usertags 706386 + pu
Usertags were: unblock.
Usertags are now: unblock pu.
> retitle 706386 pu: lua-sql/2.3.0-1+b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
> usertags 706380 = pu
Usertags were: unblock.
Usertags are now: pu.
> retitle 706380 pu: clutter-gst/1.5.4-1+build
Your message dated Wed, 01 May 2013 20:10:38 +0100
with message-id <1367435438.28602.20.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#706546: unblock: httrack/3.47.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #706546,
regarding unblock: httrack/3.47.9-1
to be marked as done.
This means th
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 698502 = pu
retitle 698502 pu: glusterfs/3.2.7-3+deb7u1
thanks
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 00:24 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Upstream just said these days, that the HEAD fix may also be
> unsecure/incomplete/broken/whatever, if this patch is not
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
> usertags 698502 = pu
Usertags were: unblock.
Usertags are now: pu.
> retitle 698502 pu: glusterfs/3.2.7-3+deb7u1
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 704601 = pu
retitle 704601 pu: hdf5/1.8.8-9+deb7u1
thanks
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 14:36 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Please unblock package hdf5
>
> This update fixes several upgrade issues (see #667599 and duplicates)
> involving hdf5. While
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
> usertags 704601 = pu
Usertags were: unblock.
Usertags are now: pu.
> retitle 704601 pu: hdf5/1.8.8-9+deb7u1
Bug #
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 706435 = pu
retitle 706435 pu: readline5/5.2+dfsg-1+deb7u1
thanks
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 11:05 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Please unblock package readline5
>
> fixes a multiarch regression in the +dfsg-1 upload
Given the closeness of the r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
> usertags 706435 = pu
Usertags were: unblock.
Usertags are now: pu.
> retitle 706435 pu: readline5/5.2+dfsg-1+deb7
Your message dated Wed, 01 May 2013 21:02:39 +0100
with message-id <1367438559.28602.39.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#695201: Bug#704222: release.debian.org: Request for
wheezy-ignore tag: bug #693577 (libfso-glib: not properly built from source)
has caused the Deb
Your message dated Wed, 01 May 2013 21:02:39 +0100
with message-id <1367438559.28602.39.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#695201: Bug#704222: release.debian.org: Request for
wheezy-ignore tag: bug #693577 (libfso-glib: not properly built from source)
has caused the Deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # What an odd typo
> close 697706
Bug #697706 [release.debian.org] RM: elementary/0.7.0.55225-1
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
697706: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 21:23 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 22:07 +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> > Please kindly remove boinc-server-maker from the distribution.
>
> We can't remove individual binary packages, and it's too late to accept
> an upload via unstable that stops b
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 18:48 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> 7u3-2.1.7-1 did still build the cacao VM, which is now disabled, and replaced
> by
> a transitional package. the cacao VM for openjdk-7 currently is not as stable
> as
> the one for openjdk-6, and trying to re-enable it caused build failu
Hi,
Le 01/05/2013 21:10, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> Let's stick with 3.46.1-1 for now and revisit which fixes might be
> suitable for a stable update after the release.
Yup, that's probably safer ; current state is not totally perfect
currently (there are still icons-related issues remaining).
Your message dated Wed, 01 May 2013 22:22:33 +0100
with message-id <1367443353.28602.46.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#706553: nmu: scribus_1.4.2.dfsg+r18267-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #706553,
regarding nmu: scribus_1.4.2.dfsg+r18267-1
to be marked as done.
Hi folks,
As we're expecting to release this Saturday (4th May) and I'm going to
be preparing the CDs and DVDs to go with the release, it would be
lovely if we have some volunteers to help test the images. We have
been doing testing of the daily, weekly and Release Candidate images
as they're prod
Am 01.05.2013 23:01, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 18:48 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> 7u3-2.1.7-1 did still build the cacao VM, which is now disabled, and
>> replaced by
>> a transitional package. the cacao VM for openjdk-7 currently is not as
>> stable as
>> the one for ope
Processing changes file: strongswan_4.4.1-5.3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: strongswan_4.4.1-5.3_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: strongswan_4.4.1-5.3_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: strongswan_4.4.1-5.3_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
38 matches
Mail list logo
