Ben Hutchings (29/04/2013):
> I've uploaded and opened an unblock bug (#706367). I didn't remember to
> set urgency=high, so please overide that. Do I need to do anything
> more?
Just needs a release guy to let it through. :)
A slightly larger patch than I anticipated, but the changes look san
On 2013-04-29 9:17, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Ben Hutchings (29/04/2013):
I've uploaded and opened an unblock bug (#706367). I didn't
remember to
set urgency=high, so please overide that. Do I need to do anything
more?
Just needs a release guy to let it through. :)
A slightly larger patch th
Your message dated Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:23:51 +0100
with message-id <7d6f49019ae876b34c3e8d13dd2dc...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#706367: unblock: udev/175-7.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #706367,
regarding unblock: udev/175-7.2
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Hi there,
Please unblock doc-debian so that the latest version moves over into
Wheezy. This package only ships documentation and it should not impact
any other stuff.
Wheezy currently ships doc-debian 4.0.2, the same version that was
shipped with the previous release. I believe that it is blocked
On 2013-04-29 11:00, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
Please unblock doc-debian so that the latest version moves over into
Wheezy. This package only ships documentation and it should not
impact
any other stuff.
It's also some time since we announced that we weren't planning on
accepting pure
On 2013-04-29 11:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2013-04-29 11:00, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
Please unblock doc-debian so that the latest version moves over into
Wheezy. This package only ships documentation and it should not
impact
any other stuff.
It's also some time since we announce
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package clutter-gst
No-change rebuild to clear binNMU state and restore multiarch
co-installability.
Uploaded to DELAYED/1.
No udebs involved, binary debdiff shows no artef
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gnome-vfs
It adds empty prerm/postrm as a workaround for dist-upgrades failing due
to dangling symlinks. See RC bug #706110
I didn't bump the urgency, so if you want
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libgnome
It adds empty prerm/postrm as a workaround for dist-upgrades failing due
to dangling symlinks. See RC bug #706110
I didn't bump the urgency, so if you want
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package lua-sql
No-change rebuild to clear binNMU state and restore multiarch
co-installability.
Uploaded to DELAYED/1.
No udebs involved, binary debdiff shows no artefacts
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package myodbc
No-change rebuild to clear binNMU state and restore multiarch
co-installability.
Uploaded to DELAYED/1.
No udebs involved, binary debdiff shows no artefacts.
Your message dated Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:29:10 +0100
with message-id <96fb0996784460ea1d8c53a0b78bf...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#706383: unblock: gnome-vfs/1:2.24.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #706383,
regarding unblock: gnome-vfs/1:2.24.4-2
to be marked as done.
Th
Your message dated Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:29:51 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#706384: unblock: libgnome/2.32.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #706384,
regarding unblock: libgnome/2.32.1-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
>> On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 01:45 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>> a few Multi-Arch: same packages have all their dependencies satisfied,
>>> but are not co-installable because they got binNMUs. A sourceful
>>> no-change upload to rebuild them should restore co-installability.
>>> I've identified 8
* Adam D. Barratt [130428 21:24]:
> >From the page in question:
>
>
> Rule #1. In all cases, when preparing an upload, please do not make
> changes to the package that are not related to fixing the bugs in
> question. As a non-exhaustive list, this implies not:
>
> Changing source format
> Chan
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Note that I do agree that shipping the old version of doc-debian would
> be silly. I'm just not particularly happy that the request is being made
> so late, and with changes that we'd probably have queried if the request
> had been made
Your message dated Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:57:17 +0100
with message-id <1367258237.5452.4.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#706366: unblock: debian-installer-launcher/17
has caused the Debian Bug report #706366,
regarding unblock: debian-installer-launcher/17
to be marked a
Your message dated Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:00:27 +0100
with message-id <1367258427.5452.6.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#706205: unblock: live-build/3.0.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #706205,
regarding unblock: live-build/3.0.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 19:34 +, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
> SQLite3 used umask to control file access permissions on newly created
> files. But umask affects the whole process and in multi-thread
> applications this means if an other thread creates a file that will use
> that setting as w
Your message dated Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:09:25 +0100
with message-id <1367258965.5452.10.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#706329: pre-approve: atlas/3.8.4-9.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #706329,
regarding unblock: atlas/3.8.4-9.1
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:40:10 +0100
with message-id <1367264410.5452.12.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#705358: RM: xgraph/12.1-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #705358,
regarding RM: xgraph/12.1-16
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:52:04 +0200
with message-id <20130429215204.75d92...@jupiter.home>
and subject line Bug#699171: Pre-Approval: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-19
has caused the Debian Bug report #699171,
regarding Pre-Approval: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-19
to be ma
Andreas Beckmann, le Sat 27 Apr 2013 13:06:55 +0200, a écrit :
> you might consider doing a no-change upload for your package to get rid
> of a bin-NMU and restore multiarch co-installability.
I'm unsure we want to risk anything with bogl, as it is used in the
debian installer, even if the install
Samuel Thibault (29/04/2013):
> Andreas Beckmann, le Sat 27 Apr 2013 13:06:55 +0200, a écrit :
> > you might consider doing a no-change upload for your package to get rid
> > of a bin-NMU and restore multiarch co-installability.
>
> I'm unsure we want to risk anything with bogl, as it is used in
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 19:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 19:34 +, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
> > SQLite3 used umask to control file access permissions on newly created
> > files. But umask affects the whole process and in multi-thread
> > applications this means i
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 21:10 +, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 19:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Please use 3.7.13-1+deb7u1 as the package version and upload ASAP.
> Uploaded, only with the upstream fix as a separate patch. Used the
> mentioned package version.
T
Samuel Thibault (29/04/2013):
> Raphaël Hertzog, le Wed 17 Apr 2013 11:40:55 +0200, a écrit :
> > Please find a tested patch in attachment.
I like the "tested" part.
> So now we have agreed on using this patch, do we include it in
> 7.0.0? Otherwise, people installing a graphical desktop with t
Vincent McIntyre (30/04/2013):
> gah. The patch was not ok. My apologies for such a gross error.
> I caught this by testing with 1.86 as downloaded from the archive.
>
> [PATCH] Actually set bootdev.
>
> After taking all the trouble to get the right value into
> the $bootdev shell variable, ensu
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:51:37AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2013-04-29 11:00, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
> >Please unblock doc-debian so that the latest version moves over into
> >Wheezy. This package only ships documentation and it should not
> >impact
> >any other stuff.
>
> It's
Hello,
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 29 Apr 2013 23:57:30 +0200, a écrit :
> Since we're going for rc3 around wednesday, please upload ASAP (so
> that it gets dinstalled before tuesday's morning britney run).
Now done.
> > > Let me know if you want me to push this change to master or if you
> > > want
On 2013-04-30 1:20, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 29 Apr 2013 23:57:30 +0200, a écrit :
Since we're going for rc3 around wednesday, please upload ASAP (so
that it gets dinstalled before tuesday's morning britney run).
Now done.
Approved.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
31 matches
Mail list logo
