package release.debian.org
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 687583 + rm - unblock
retitle 687583 RM: altos/1.0.3
thanks
Hi Release Managers,
Please remove altos from testing as per maintainer comment in #676739.
Cheers,
Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian..
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi Release Team,
I've been looking into Postfix RC bug #700719. In short, my proposal is to
fix the maintainer field and then unblock the package. Please see my message
in the bug log for d
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 06.03.2013 08:09, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I've been looking into Postfix RC bug #700719. In short, my proposal
is to
fix the maintainer field and then unblock the package. Please see my
message
in the bug log for details.
If LaMont is not currently available to m
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #702412 [release.debian.org] pre-approval unblock: postfix
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
702412: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702412
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Op woensdag 6 maart 2013 10:16:18 schreef Adam D. Barratt:
> It looks like the maintainer field is already fixed in sid, in
> 2.10.0-1; that is a number of upstream releases more recent than the
> current wheezy package, however.
>
> Your last message in #700719 indicates that your inclination t
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:20:43PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 12:56 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > + * Re-enable cluster support. (closes: #697676)
> > + * Disable thin support. We lack the thin_check binary and it does not
> > work
> > +anyway. (closes: #702163)
Processing changes file: openssh_5.5p1-6+squeeze4_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1udahh-0002oq...@franck.debian.org
Your message dated Wed, 6 Mar 2013 18:00:18 +0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: unblock: scim-thai/0.1.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #702321,
regarding unblock: scim-thai/0.1.3-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
On 05.03.2013 23:10, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
> [1] dget -x http://www.barcikacomp.hu/gcs/syslog-ng_3.3.5-3.dsc
A couple of comments:
1/ as you no longer mark the symlinks as conffiles, the cleanup in
syslog-ng-core.postrm is not necessary.
2/ you need to remove the existing conffile syml
Hi folks,
I'd like to do an upload of a new upstream release of nbd.
I realize that we're pretty deep in the freeze and that now pobably
isn't a very good time to do that anymore. I'd still like that a freeze
exception.
Here's my rationale:
Since the release of NBD 3.2 in July last year, 46 pat
Your message dated Wed, 6 Mar 2013 13:03:47 +
with message-id <20130306130347.gg6...@halon.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#692212: unblock (pre-approval): pike7.8/7.8.700-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #692212,
regarding unblock (pre-approval): pike7.8/7.8.700-2
to be marked as done.
This
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:09:50AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> I've been looking into Postfix RC bug #700719. In short, my proposal is to
> fix the maintainer field and then unblock the package. Please see my message
> in the bug log for details.
wheezy has 2.9.3-2.1, sid has 2.10.0-1. Given
Your message dated Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:05:58 +
with message-id <907826f8180c5d71c55d43c83e2a5...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#687583: RM: altos/wheezy
has caused the Debian Bug report #687583,
regarding RM: altos/1.0.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:22:25PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 03.03.2013 14:38, Colin Watson wrote:
> >+openssh (1:5.5p1-6+squeeze4) stable; urgency=low
> >+
> >+ * CVE-2011-5000: Fix potential int overflow when using
> >gssapi-with-mac
> >+authentation.
>
> Please go ahead; thanks.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> submitter 676546 anar...@debian.org
Bug #676546 [gobby-0.5] crashes after a random amount of time
Changed Bug submitter to 'anar...@debian.org' from 'Antoine Beaupré
'
> submitter 677268 anar...@debian.org
Bug #677268 [infinoted-0.5] server cras
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> submitter 622705 anar...@debian.org
Failed to set submitter on 622705: Not altering archived bugs; see unarchive.
> submitter 669878 anar...@debian.org
Failed to set submitter on 669878: Not altering archived bugs; see unarchive.
> submitter 676
-=| Slávek Banko, 05.03.2013 17:55:51 +0100 |=-
> Dne po 4. března 2013 Moritz Muehlenhoff napsal(a):
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:40:54PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:14:51 +0200
> > >
> > > Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > > > > Forwarded: http://tracker.fir
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 03.03.2013, 17:11 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> > CC'ing the maintainers+uploader of the affected, plus the reporter for
> > comments on this. Do any of you feel you would be able to write a patch
> > for it that could be included in Wheezy or ...?
>
> I don’t think I’ll
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:06:05 +, Toby Smithe wrote:
> On 6 March 2013 05:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > In general, sure, improved architecture support is great. During a
> > freeze however it's often more of a "feature" and generally won't be as
> > well tested as previously supported arc
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 13:58:24 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> What are my chances of that being allowed in?
>
For r0 I would say it's too late. It should still be possible to
include fixes in a subsequent point release.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 13:17 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 1/ as you no longer mark the symlinks as conffiles, the cleanup in
> syslog-ng-core.postrm is not necessary.
Removed.
> 2/ you need to remove the existing conffile symlinks in
> syslog-ng-core.preinst so dpkg converts it to non-conffiles o
Le mercredi 06 mars 2013 à 18:53 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 20:49:30 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Please unblock package ekiga.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 20:49:30 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package ekiga. Version 3.2.7-6 fixes security RC bug #702282.
> The debdiff is attached.
>
> un
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package perl
Changes:
perl (5.14.2-19) unstable; urgency=high
.
* [SECURITY] CVE-2013-1667: fix a rehashing DoS opportunity
against code that uses arbitrary user i
I'd say, we're almost there
On 06.03.2013 18:45, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 13:17 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> 2/ you need to remove the existing conffile symlinks in
>> syslog-ng-core.preinst so dpkg converts it to non-conffiles on upgrades
> Remove those in pre
Your message dated Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:46:34 +
with message-id <1362599194.7567.3.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#702454: unblock: perl/5.14.2-19
has caused the Debian Bug report #702454,
regarding unblock: perl/5.14.2-19
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi,
Niko Tyni wrote (06 Mar 2013 18:59:02 GMT) :
>* [SECURITY] CVE-2013-1667: fix a rehashing DoS opportunity
> against code that uses arbitrary user input as hash keys.
> (Closes: #702296)
Thanks for your work.
> unblock perl/5.14.2-19
FWIW, I've verified that the attached debdif
reassign 701936 initscripts
severity 701936 serious
thanks
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 07:50:37AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> retitle 701936 btrfs can't fsck /run/rootdev on boot with sysvinit
> severity 701936 important
> clone 701936 -1
> reassign -1 sysvinit
> thanks
>
> works with systemd, it'
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
The current README.Debian is quite old
It gives some advice that will lead to people having a broken system
(e.g. no networking). It describes a procedure for configuring
networking that is completely opposite to what has been described more
recently
On 03/06/2013 09:05 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> 1) checkroot.sh creates an invalid /run/rootdev
afaic, this is the only "real" problem.
> 2) fsck.btrfs fails to fsck a mounted filesystem
>
> fsck.btrfs won't check a mounted filesystem, even if mounted
> read-only. We need to be able to do this, si
On 2013-02-19 20:21, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:39:57PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>
>> [...]
>
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> I finally had some time to work on a new package, with both removing the
> extjs library, and fixing the symlink to the library.
Control: retitle -1 unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval)
On 2013-03-06 21:23, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> The current README.Debian is quite old
>
> It gives some advice that will lead to people having a broken system
> (e.g. no networking). It
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval)
Bug #702458 [release.debian.org] unblock: xcp-xapi - urgent documentation fixes
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval)' from 'unblock:
xcp-xapi - urgent documentation fixes'
--
702458: htt
On 06/03/13 21:42, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval)
>
> On 2013-03-06 21:23, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> The current README.Debian is quite old
>>
>> It gives some advice that will lead to people
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:16:01PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > 2) fsck.btrfs fails to fsck a mounted filesystem
> >
> > fsck.btrfs won't check a mounted filesystem, even if mounted
> > read-only. We need to be able to do this, since we are running
> > fsck from the rootfs. We do this for a
Your message dated Wed, 06 Mar 2013 22:23:15 +0100
with message-id <5137b3c3.1090...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#702285: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #702285,
regarding unblock: vlc/2.0.3-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please remove tty-clock. It's got lots of issues that aren't really
being worked on (bug #700738). It also has no reverse-dependencies
and has yet to be included in a stable release.
Thanks,
M
On 03/06/2013 09:51 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
>>> 3) fsck.btrfs does not support the standard fsck options
>>
>> easy fixable, but hasn't much to do with the current remaining problem
>> in sid.
>
> Yes, it does.
no, it does not.
even if fsck.btrfs ignores all required options, it still fails becau
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 10:41:05PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 03/06/2013 09:51 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >>> 3) fsck.btrfs does not support the standard fsck options
> >>
> >> easy fixable, but hasn't much to do with the current remaining problem
> >> in sid.
> >
> > Yes, it does.
>
> no, i
severity 701936 critical
thanks
This is a critical bug. Please do not lower the severity again.
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools
`-GPG Public Key F33D 2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package avahi
The main fix is making avahi-daemon compatible with the ifupdown changes
that were introduced in wheezy. Without that, the boot process can be
blocked by avahi-
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:45:45PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Please remove tty-clock. It's got lots of issues that aren't really
> being worked on (bug #700738). It also has no reverse-dependencies
> and has yet to be included in a stable release.
The bug you quote was filed on 16th Feb, a
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Subject: RM: tty-clock/1.1-1
I suspect there is an "RoQA" missing.
> Please remove tty-clock. It's got lots of issues
I just see one RC bug at http://bugs.debian.org/src:tty-clock -- the
remaining issues are of severity minor at most.
>
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #702465 [release.debian.org] RM: tty-clock/1.1-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
702465: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702465
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 702458 + moreinfo
Bug #702458 [release.debian.org] unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval)
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
702458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 702458 - moreinfo
Bug #702458 [release.debian.org] unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-14 (pre-approval)
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> tags 702465 + moreinfo
Bug #702465 [release.debian.org] RM: tty-clock/1.1-1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #702465 t
On 2013-03-06, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:45:45PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> Please remove tty-clock. It's got lots of issues that aren't really
>> being worked on (bug #700738). It also has no reverse-dependencies
>> and has yet to be included in a stable releas
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2013-03-06, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:45:45PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>>> Please remove tty-clock. It's got lots of issues that aren't really
>>> being worked on (bug #700738). It also has no reverse-
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> And this application:
> github-backup
I don't have the ability to read or write Haskell, but it would be
very sad to lose github-backup.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@
50 matches
Mail list logo
