Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu ruby-bcrypt_3.0.1-2 ruby-bdb_0.6.5-7 ruby-dep-selector_0.0.8-1
ruby-eventmachine_0.12.10-3 ruby-gherkin_2.11.1-1 ruby-globalhotkeys_0.3.2-3
ruby-libxml_2.3.2-1 ruby-msgpack_0.4.6-4 ruby
Hi,
I just figured the libnss3 package in wheezy contains duplicated
libraries as can be seen on
http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/amd64/libnss3/filelist :
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfreebl3.so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnssckbi.so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnssdbm3.so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linu
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 01:41 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:28 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
> > Security update has been uploaded. I'll post the builds somewhere as
> > they become available for anyone interested in testing.
>
> Version 2.6.32-48 has also been uploaded.
Flagg
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-48_multi.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u6jl0-0003mq...@franck.debian.org
Control: tags -1 + confirmed squeeze
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 11:53 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> as already discussed, I’d like to propose a stable upload for gdm3 in
> order to avoid a security risk when doing upgrades.
>
> Theoretically, with the greeter session of gdm 2.30 and the glib versi
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed squeeze
Bug #697751 [release.debian.org] pu: package gdm3/2.30.5-6squeeze5
Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed.
--
697751: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697751
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 699235 RM: elmerfem -- RoM; licensing problems
Bug #699235 [release.debian.org] RM: elmerfem/stable -- ROM; license problems
Changed Bug title to 'RM: elmerfem -- RoM; licensing problems' from 'RM:
elmerfem/stable -- ROM; license problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 699235 + squeeze
Bug #699235 [release.debian.org] RM: elmerfem -- RoM; licensing problems
Added tag(s) squeeze.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
699235: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
Last week I uploaded a new version of the mixmaster package to unstable
to close bug #690206.
Since then Osamu Aoki has suggested to me in an email that I should ask
for an unblock request for this upload.
The bug was not RC but it probably should have been since the problem
caused a SegFault on
Processing changes file: openssl_0.9.8o-4squeeze14_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssl_0.9.8o-4squeeze14_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssl_0.9.8o-4squeeze14_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssl_0.9.8o-4squeeze14_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Proce
On 2013-02-15 13:24, Colin Tuckley wrote:
> Last week I uploaded a new version of the mixmaster package to unstable
> to close bug #690206.
>
> Since then Osamu Aoki has suggested to me in an email that I should ask
> for an unblock request for this upload.
>
> The bug was not RC but it probably
Hi,
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote (08 Feb 2013 19:03:48 GMT) :
> now that i have a volunteer other than myself to test it, i will wait
> until i hear back from you :)
I've been using the proposed msva-perl's integration into the SSH
client for a week and have not experienced any regression.
> meanwh
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 686054 pre-approval: msva-perl/0.8.1-1
Bug #686054 [release.debian.org] unblock: msva-perl/0.9.1-1
Changed Bug title to 'pre-approval: msva-perl/0.8.1-1' from 'unblock:
msva-perl/0.9.1-1'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package systemd
It fixes a couple of annoying issues. Especially #673309 and #692150 are
rather important. The implemented fixes are mostly workarounds to make
systemd integr
Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:24:24 +
with message-id <1360941864.20472.12.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#700626: unblock: systemd/44-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #700626,
regarding unblock: systemd/44-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-48_s390.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u6nva-0004o6...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: unbound_1.4.6-1+squeeze3_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u6nyd-0004os...@franck.debian.org
Hi Adam,
On 15.02.2013 16:24, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 14:09 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Please unblock package systemd
>>
>> It fixes a couple of annoying issues. Especially #673309 and #692150 are
>> rather important. The implemented fixes are mostly workarounds to make
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 10:41 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> [ cups (1.4.4-7+squeeze2) stable-security; urgency=high ]
Our sanity check grumbled about this one, as p-u has +squeeze3; is that
intentional? I can't remember what we've done in such situations
previously.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNS
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 17:43 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Thanks for being so quick with the unblock!
> Unfortunately I didn't notice a rare corner case so I did a followup
> upload, but you beat me to it :-)
> The diff is rather small (attached). Would be great if you can update
> the unblock acco
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 21:04 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> After reading all the related bug reports again, it looks like lvm2 is
> actually intended to work well even without udev running and this has
> been implemented in wheezy via fixing the init script dependencies. So
> let us backport this
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed squeeze
Bug #700568 [release.debian.org] pu: package poppler/0.12.4-1.2+squeeze1
Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed.
--
700568: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700568
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 + confirmed squeeze
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 13:18 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
> +poppler (0.12.4-1.2+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
> +
> + * Add myself as uploader.
> + * Fix CVE-2010-0206.
> + * Fix CVE-2010-0207; patch adapted to be API-/ABI-compatible.
> + * Fix CVE-2010-4653;
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dbus-glib to fix CVE-2013-0292 (#700638):
unblock dbus-glib/0.100.1-1
I did a new upstream release with only the necessary change.
Source debdiff (with most of t
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed squeeze
Bug #700563 [release.debian.org] pu: package fglrx-driver/10-9-3squeeze1
Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed.
--
700563: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700563
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 + confirmed squeeze
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 11:57 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> * fglrx-glx{,-ia32}.preinst: Create diversions on upgrades, too.
> * fglrx-driver.preinst: Move removal of old libdri.so diversion to postinst.
> The fglrx-driver package in lenny shipped the
Control: tags -1 + confirmed squeeze
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 22:12 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> * libnautilus-extension1: Add Breaks: samba-common (<< 2:3.5) to fix an
> upgrade path from lenny involving nautilus-share where lenny's apt would
> fail with "Error, pkgProblemResolver::Res
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed squeeze
Bug #700523 [release.debian.org] pu: package nautilus/2.30.1-2squeeze2
Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed.
--
700523: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700523
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with p
Control: tags -1 + confirmed squeeze
On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 13:33 -0700, Jonathan Niehof wrote:
> The diff is a minimal change for this bug only. It is identical to
> 0.9.2-3.3 in testing, with the exception of targeting stable.
+pam-shield (0.9.2-3.3+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
The version nee
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed squeeze
Bug #699696 [release.debian.org] pu: package libpam-shield/0.9.2-3.2
Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed.
--
699696: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699696
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro
[resending to team@security rather than -security@lists]
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 22:21 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 10/02/13 22:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 20:59 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> >> Please would it possible to fix #694096 / CVE-2012-4576 via
> >> s
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 20:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:16:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Please go ahead with the upload to unstable, as we need the issues
> > fixing there in any case, however we proceed; thanks.
>
> Done, 3.1.0~rc2-2 just uploaded to sid.
That wa
Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:28:48 +
with message-id <1360952928.20472.30.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#700640: unblock: dbus-glib/0.100.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #700640,
regarding unblock: dbus-glib/0.100.1-1
to be marked as done.
This me
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-48_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u6r0v-0002lo...@franck.debian.org
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:21:29 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 20:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:16:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Please go ahead with the upload to unstable, as we need the issues
> > > fixing there in any case, however we pr
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-48_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-48_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http:/
Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:11:18 +
with message-id <20130215221118.gk5...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#700318: unblock: darktable/1.0.4-1+deb7u1 TPU
pre-approval
has caused the Debian Bug report #700318,
regarding unblock: darktable/1.0.4-1+deb7u1 TPU pre-
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-48_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u6tme-vu...@franck.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
there is an upgrade issue from lenny to squeeze due to a file conflict
between libzorp2-dev (existed in lenny only) and libzorpll-dev:
Preparing to replace libzorpll-dev 3.0.6.4.2+nmu1 (u
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
there is an upgrade issue from lenny to squeeze:
Preparing to replace gforge-web-apache2 4.7~rc2-7lenny3 (using
.../gforge-web-apache2_5.0.2-5_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement gforge
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-48_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u6bmh-0003qn...@franck.debian.org
41 matches
Mail list logo
