On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
>
> Why is that bug not mentioned in the changelog? Please add an
> appropriate closure.
>
> With the above change, please go ahead.
Done.
Cheers!
--
Sergei Golovan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi!
Please unblock bacula-* packages, it fixes security bug #699244
(service run with incorrect permissions)
debdiff --diffstat output attached
Thank you!
--
with best regards,
Alexande
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package r-cran-genabel
The problem was fixed by backporting the solution from upstream (see debdiff).
unblock r-cran-genabel/1.7-0-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu gdigi_0.4.0-1 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in a clean Debian sid environment."
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
gdigi : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14) but 2.13-38 is to be insta
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mg
It fixes the alternatives handling for /usr/bin/editor:
* don't remove + reinstall the alternative during upgrades
(could clear a manual setting of the alternati
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package sisc
* sisc.prerm: Unregister the correct alternatives on package removal.
(Closes: #668440)
Otherwise this leaves about 10 broken symlinks in /usr/bin.
unblock
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package uzbl
* Preserve x-www-browser alternative on upgrades.
* Remove x-www-browser alternative on uninstallation. (Closes: #656222)
Otherwise this may destroy manual
Followup-For: Bug #698538
Control: retitle -1 unblock: ca-certificates-java/20121112+nmu2
Hi,
fixed also the problem w.r.t to nss.cfg which only uncovered after the
first fix.
ca-certificates-java (20121112+nmu2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload.
* postinst, jks-keystore.hoo
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:07:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#699335: unblock: r-cran-genabel/1.7-0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #699335,
regarding unblock: r-cran-genabel/1.7-0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 unblock: ca-certificates-java/20121112+nmu2
Bug #698538 [release.debian.org] unblock: ca-certificates-java/20121112+nmu1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: ca-certificates-java/20121112+nmu2' from
'unblock: ca-certificates-java/20121112+nmu1'
--
698538: htt
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:10:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#699336: nmu: gdigi_0.4.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #699336,
regarding nmu: gdigi_0.4.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:13:56 +
with message-id <985486130c1cbd2ca15253ea4cfe8...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#699338: unblock: mg/20110905-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #699338,
regarding unblock: mg/20110905-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:14:58 +
with message-id <48fcced74e8ff2af3ebab717cf341...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#699339: unblock: sisc/1.16.6-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #699339,
regarding unblock: sisc/1.16.6-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:16:13 +
with message-id <67b4b2bd96b83bc63b444cd542282...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#699340: unblock: uzbl/0.0.0~git.20120514-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #699340,
regarding unblock: uzbl/0.0.0~git.20120514-1.1
to be marke
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 30.01.2013 02:14, Craig Small wrote:
psmisc 22.19-2 is a minimal change to 22.19-1 that fixes a bug for
kFreeBSD systems (see #687829) where they don't shutdown cleanly.
Other than the version number the debdiff says there is no difference
to the packages. The pat
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #699308 [release.debian.org] unblock: psmisc/22.19-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
699308: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699308
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Previously mentioned debdiff attached.
diff -u openacs-5.5.1+dfsg/debian/control openacs-5.5.1+dfsg/debian/control
--- openacs-5.5.1+dfsg/debian/control
+++ openacs-5.5.1+dfsg/debian/control
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
Package: openacs
Architecture: all
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, aolserver4-daemon (>= 4.5.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Maybe unblock package sendmail
sendmail in squeeze and testing creates a big mess with symlinks in
/usr/share/doc (and the same in /usr/share/bug, although less noticable)
with the followin
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'd like to fix fstrcmp via t-p-u:
* fstrcmp: Add Breaks/Replaces: libfstrcmp-dev (<< 0.4). (Closes: #694286)
(otherwise you are also welcome to just unblock fstrcmp/sid)
Please set the correct usertags on this bug, reportbug does not offer a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 698538 - moreinfo
Bug #698538 [release.debian.org] unblock: ca-certificates-java/20121112+nmu2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> tags 668449 + pending
Bug #668449 [ctwm] ctwm: leaves alternatives after purge
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 656450 + pen
On 01/30/2013 02:40 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu gdigi_0.4.0-1 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in a clean Debian sid environment."
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2013-01-28 06:08, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package kdesdk
>
> The most important bug fix is RC #695701, which rem
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #699142 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): kdesdk/4:4.8.4+dfsg-1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
699142: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699142
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release Team,
please unblock sextractor.
2.8.6+dfsg-1 fixes a copyright issue for PDF documentation which were
distributed without an ap
On 2013-01-30 17:36, Ahmed Toulan wrote:
> Package was built on Ubuntu Precise (12.04) but using pbuilder to verify
> that it builds correctly on sid.
Did you upload the package that was built in the sid chroot?
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2013-01-30 15:29, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to fix fstrcmp via t-p-u:
>
> * fstrcmp: Add Breaks/Replaces: libfstrcmp-dev (<< 0.4). (Closes: #694286)
>
> (otherwise you are also welcome to just
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #699349 [release.debian.org] tpu: fstrcmp 0.4.D001-1+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
699349: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699349
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:48:50 +0100
with message-id <51094ef2.4060...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#699362: unblock: sextractor/2.8.6+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #699362,
regarding unblock: sextractor/2.8.6+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
On 30.01.2013 14:29, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Please set the correct usertags on this bug, reportbug does not offer
a
tpu template :-( (is there a bug for this already?)
We're using "unblock" for tpu requests as well (given that the general
use case for them is during freezes).
Regards,
Ada
On 2013-01-30 17:53, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> We're using "unblock" for tpu requests as well (given that the general
> use case for them is during freezes).
Then reportbug should just update the description)
-8 unblock unblock requests
+8 unblock unblock requests or t-p-u requests
or wha
On 2013-01-30 17:47, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-01-30 15:29, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> I'd like to fix fstrcmp via t-p-u:
>> * fstrcmp: Add Breaks/Replaces: libfstrcmp-dev (<< 0.4). (Closes: #694286)
> Thanks for looking at this and please go ahead with the upload.
Uploaded to DELAYED/2
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #699295 [release.debian.org] pre-approval for unblock:
dahdi-linux/1:2.6.1+dfsg-2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
699295: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699295
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2013-01-30 00:07, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please consider pre-approving dahdi-linux/1:2.6.1+dfsg-2
> (not yet uploaded, would go via unstable)
>
AFA
On 01/30/2013 06:40 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Did you upload the package that was built in the sid chroot?
>
> Andreas
No I didn't. I am re-uploading the package from inside the sid chroot.
Hope it solve the problem.
Best regards,
Ahmed Toulan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sig
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:03:13AM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Le Sat, 26 Jan 2013 00:59:16 +,
> Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
>
> > I am happy with your changes in principle although:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:54:03PM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > > + ssh_set_erro
On 2013-01-30 18:17, Ahmed Toulan wrote:
> On 01/30/2013 06:40 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Did you upload the package that was built in the sid chroot?
> No I didn't.
Please do this in the future.
Debian does not discard the binary packages from the maintainer upload
(arch=amd64 in your case)
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 19:41:20 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2013-01-30 18:17, Ahmed Toulan wrote:
> > On 01/30/2013 06:40 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> >> Did you upload the package that was built in the sid chroot?
>
> > No I didn't.
>
> Please do this in the future.
>
> Debian does n
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 13:33:50 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package r-cran-genabel
>
> The problem was fixed by backporting the solution from upstream (see debd
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 14:56:53 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Maybe unblock package sendmail
>
> sendmail in squeeze and testing creates a big mess with symlinks in
> /usr/sh
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libvdpau
Hi,
libvdpau may cause a segfault if it is dlopen()ed and thereafter
dlclosed() before XCloseDisplay() is called. See the patch description
for more details
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 20:07:48 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package libvdpau
>
> Hi,
>
> libvdpau may cause a segfault if it is dlopen()ed and thereafter
>
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 14:33:49 +0400, Alexander Golovko wrote:
> diffstat for bacula-5.2.6+dfsg bacula-5.2.6+dfsg
>
> additions/common-functions.dpkg |7 ++-
> changelog |7 +++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff -Nru bacula-5.2.6
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 699375 + moreinfo
Bug #699375 [release.debian.org] unblock: libvdpau/0.4.1-8
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
699375: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 699326 + moreinfo
Bug #699326 [release.debian.org] unblock: bacula/5.2.6+dfsg-8
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
699326: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
On 2013-01-30 20:18, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 20:07:48 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> libvdpau may cause a segfault if it is dlopen()ed and thereafter
>> dlclosed() before XCloseDisplay() is called. See the patch description
>> for more details.
>>
> Who does that?
Applic
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:43:11 +0100, Bertrand Marc wrote:
> * Fix build on kfreebsd, thanks to Christoph Egger (Closes: #688486).
Is the package tested to actually work on kfreebsd?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 699153 + moreinfo
Bug #699153 [release.debian.org] unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-6
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
699153: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=69915
Hi Julien,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 07:53:05PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 13:33:50 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Please unblock package r
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:29:01 +0100
with message-id <20130130202901.gk8...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#699318: unblock: spamassassin/3.3.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #699318,
regarding unblock: spamassassin/3.3.2-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 21:04:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 07:53:05PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 13:33:50 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.debian..
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:32:47PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > My analysis was wrong. It actually does access the network but *if* it
> > is able the build breaks (as well as the attempt to load the library in
> > R). I guess there are good chances that the build would have worked if
> > net
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:39:13 +0100
with message-id <510984f1.4020...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#697011: unblock: filelight/4:4.8.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #697011,
regarding unblock: filelight/4:4.8.4-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Please note! This is a TESTING proposed update request. Not a
stable proposed update request. The reason for this is explained below.
The update is a solution for #685251. I would like you t
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 21:37:03 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:32:47PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > My analysis was wrong. It actually does access the network but *if* it
> > > is able the build breaks (as well as the attempt to load the library in
> > > R). I gu
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 699385 = unblock
retitle 699385 unblock: quantum/2012.1-5 [pre-approval]
severity 699385 normal
thanks
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 21:44 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Please note! This is a TESTING proposed update request. Not a
> stable proposed upda
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
> usertags 699385 = unblock
Usertags were: pu.
Usertags are now: unblock.
> retitle 699385 unblock: quantum/2012.1-
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #699148 [release.debian.org] unblock: celery/2.5.3-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
699148: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699148
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:57:36 +0100, Michael Fladischer wrote:
> diff -Nru celery-2.5.3/debian/python-celery.postrm
> celery-2.5.3/debian/python-celery.postrm
> --- celery-2.5.3/debian/python-celery.postrm 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
> +0100
> +++ celery-2.5.3/deb
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 12:00 +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Adam D. Barratt
> wrote:
> >
> > Why is that bug not mentioned in the changelog? Please add an
> > appropriate closure.
> >
> > With the above change, please go ahead.
>
> Done.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #699228 [release.debian.org] pu: package snack/2.2.10-dfsg1-9+squeeze1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
699228: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699228
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSU
В Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:40:07 +0100
Julien Cristau пишет:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 14:33:49 +0400, Alexander Golovko wrote:
>
> > diffstat for bacula-5.2.6+dfsg bacula-5.2.6+dfsg
> >
> > additions/common-functions.dpkg |7 ++-
> > changelog |7 +++
> > 2 fi
Processing changes file: rails_2.3.5-1.2+squeeze6_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: snack_2.2.10-dfsg1-9+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 06:19:00PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 2013-01-30 00:07, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Please consider pre-approvi
retitle 699213: unblock: network-manager/0.9.4.0-10
thanks
On 29.01.2013 05:00, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package network-manager
>
> It fixes a bunch of RC bugs and
On 2013-01-30 20:44, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 20:07:48 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>> libvdpau may cause a segfault if it is dlopen()ed and thereafter
> xbmc-bin is a possible candidate as it only Recommends: libvdpau1
I tried xbmc, but so far I failed to make it play
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 699213 unblock: network-manager/0.9.4.0-10
Bug #699213 [release.debian.org] unblock: network-manager/0.9.4.0-9
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: network-manager/0.9.4.0-10' from 'unblock:
network-manager/0.9.4.0-9'
> thanks
Stopping processi
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:30:01 +0100
with message-id <20130130213001.gp8...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#699326: unblock: bacula/5.2.6+dfsg-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #699326,
regarding unblock: bacula/5.2.6+dfsg-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 22:23:33 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> While installing it I noticed that it Recommends: python-qt3 which is
> only in squeeze (#685076) - which RC level is "Recommends an unavailable
> package"?
>
Probably 'important' (assuming you mean 'severity' instead of 'RC').
Ch
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Would it be possible to unblock mednafen? It fixes #699143 which I
consider important (I replaced the version of libvorbisidec provided
in the mednafen source code with a dependency on
The complete description that you provide confirms that your changes
will most probably not reach wheezy, as they are not compliant with
the current freeze policy [1].
#688558 has a severity of normal. The worst other patched bug (ever
growing config file) seems a normal bug to me [2].
[1] http:/
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release managers,
Please unblock package bristol 0.60.10-3, it contains an improvement to
the patch already applied in the past to fix bugs#674229 ('FTBFS due to
hardcoded compiler opt
Processing changes file: snack_2.2.10-dfsg1-9+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: snack_2.2.10-dfsg1-9+squeeze1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: snack_2.2.10-dfsg1-9+squeeze1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: snack_2.2.10-dfsg1-9+sq
Processing changes file: snack_2.2.10-dfsg1-9+squeeze1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u0l7b-0005dh...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: snack_2.2.10-dfsg1-9+squeeze1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u0llg-u9...@franck.debian.org
Thanks Adam. I thougt unblock was wrong. Now I know and will do better next
time.
Sent from my phone
-Original Message-
From: "Adam D. Barratt"
To: Ola Lundqvist , 699...@bugs.debian.org
Sent: ons, 30 jan 2013 21:53
Subject: Re: Bug#699385: pu: package quantum/2012.1-5
user release.d
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2013 06:26:09 +
with message-id <1359613569.20018.6.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#699401: unblock: bristol/0.60.10-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #699401,
regarding unblock: bristol/0.60.10-3
to be marked as done.
This means t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libvirt
since it fixes
* CVE-2013-0170
* a bug in the dependencies (#699128)
* Fixes a possible daemon crash with KVM (#699281)
* fixes a client deadlock (without a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package system-config-printer
Laurent prepared this upload and fixed a missing dependency (#627810). A
missing file in the package (#6955820) making things actually work agai
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libvirt
since it fixes
* CVE-2013-0170
* a bug in the dependencies (#699128)
* Fixes a possible daemon crash with KVM (#699281)
* fixes a client deadlock (without a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 699409 699407
Bug #699409 [release.debian.org] unblock: libvirt/0.9.12-6
Bug #699407 [release.debian.org] unblock: libvirt/0.9.12-6
Merged 699407 699409
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
6
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2013 07:42:41 +
with message-id <4e6fa58baab9351e4a95b470a43be...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#699407: unblock: libvirt/0.9.12-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #699407,
regarding unblock: libvirt/0.9.12-6
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2013 07:42:41 +
with message-id <4e6fa58baab9351e4a95b470a43be...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#699407: unblock: libvirt/0.9.12-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #699407,
regarding unblock: libvirt/0.9.12-6
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2013 07:43:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#699408: unblock: system-config-printer/1.3.7-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #699408,
regarding unblock: system-config-printer/1.3.7-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
83 matches
Mail list logo
