Processed (with 1 errors): pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 698341 pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1 Bug #698341 [release.debian.org] RM: spatialite-tools/3.0.0~beta20110817-3 Changed Bug title to 'pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1' from 'RM: spatialite-tools/3.0.

Bug#698341: pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1

retitle 698341 pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1 user 698341 release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 698341 = pu thanks Hello RT, let's try to fix this instead of going for removal. I've applied the debdiff prepared by Felix Geyer in #683075 [0], and checked that it comp

Bug#698201: marked as done (unblock: pygame/1.9.1release+dfsg-8)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 10:00:00 +0100 with message-id <50fa6090.4080...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#698201: unblock: pygame/1.9.1release+dfsg-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #698201, regarding unblock: pygame/1.9.1release+dfsg-8 to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#698486: unblock: kbuild/1:0.1.9998svn2543+dfsg-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package kbuild The current version of kbuild in wheezy causes virtualbox to FTBFS (bug #697892) and thus blocks a security fix of virtualbox (bug #698292). unblock kbuild/1:

Bug#698486: unblock: kbuild/1:0.1.9998svn2543+dfsg-1

On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 10:12 +0100, Felix Geyer wrote: > Please unblock package kbuild > > The current version of kbuild in wheezy causes virtualbox to FTBFS (bug > #697892) I did that last night. > and thus blocks a security fix of virtualbox (bug #698292). However, I'm confused by this commen

Bug#698486: marked as done (unblock: kbuild/1:0.1.9998svn2543+dfsg-1)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 10:52:15 + with message-id <1358592735.12995.25.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#698486: unblock: kbuild/1:0.1.9998svn2543+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #698486, regarding unblock: kbuild/1:0.1.9998svn2543+dfsg-1 to be

Processed: user release.debian....@packages.debian.org, usertagging 698341 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). > usertags 698341 = unblock Usertags were: pu. Usertags are now: unblock. > retitle 698341 unblock: spatialite/3.0

Processed: Re: Bug#698467: unblock: taurus/3.0.0-2

Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #698467 [release.debian.org] unblock: taurus/3.0.0-2 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 698467: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698467 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d

Bug#698467: unblock: taurus/3.0.0-2

Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 23:32:27 +0100, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > diff -Nru taurus-3.0.0/debian/changelog taurus-3.0.0/debian/changelog > --- taurus-3.0.0/debian/changelog 2012-05-01 20:52:58.0 +0200 > +++ taurus-3.0.0/debian/changelog 2013-01-1

Bug#698444: marked as done (unblock: libfm/0.1.17-2.1)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 12:05:24 +0100 with message-id <20130119110524.go5...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#698444: unblock: libfm/0.1.17-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #698444, regarding unblock: libfm/0.1.17-2.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#698341: pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1

On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 09:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > retitle 698341 pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1 > user 698341 release.debian@packages.debian.org > usertags 698341 = pu Nope. "pu" is for stable; fixed up. > I've applied the debdiff prepared by Felix Geyer in #683075

Bug#698381: unblock: ifupdown/0.7.6

Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 19:58:31 +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote: > ifupdown (0.7.6) unstable; urgency=low > > [ Andrew O. Shadura ] > * Don't configure bridge interfaces as tagged VLAN interfaces > (Closes: #696642). Why is this not a configuration bug (using a nam

Processed: Re: Bug#698381: unblock: ifupdown/0.7.6

Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #698381 [release.debian.org] unblock: ifupdown/0.7.6 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 698381: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698381 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d

Bug#698221: marked as done (unblock: qemu/1.1.2+dfsg-5 qemu-kvm/1.1.2+dfsg-5)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 12:23:00 +0100 with message-id <20130119112300.gq5...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#698221: unblock: qemu/1.1.2+dfsg-5 qemu-kvm/1.1.2+dfsg-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #698221, regarding unblock: qemu/1.1.2+dfsg-5 qemu-kvm/1.1.2+dfsg-5 to be

Processed: Re: Bug#698117: unblock: rebuildd/0.4.2

Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #698117 [release.debian.org] unblock: rebuildd/0.4.2 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 698117: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698117 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d

Bug#698453: marked as done (unblock: tpu (pre-approval) pidgin-otr/3.2.1-3+deb7u1)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 11:26:19 + with message-id <1358594779.12995.36.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#698453: unblock: tpu (pre-approval) pidgin-otr/3.2.1-3+deb7u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #698453, regarding unblock: tpu (pre-approval) pidgi

Bug#698117: unblock: rebuildd/0.4.2

Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 09:50:18 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package rebuildd > > It appears that bug #671635 is critical and makes reb

Bug#697900: marked as done (Pre-Approval for yajl 2.0.4-3)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 12:29:33 +0100 with message-id <20130119112933.gs5...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#697900: Pre-Approval for yajl 2.0.4-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #697900, regarding Pre-Approval for yajl 2.0.4-3 to be marked as done. This means that you cl

Bug#697764: unblock: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-4

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 14:51:55 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package glib2.0 > > It fixes two RC bugs. > Related to #676485 is the pu request for gdm3/squeeze [1

Bug#696608: unlock: lilypond/2.14.2-4 (preapproval)

On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 19:43:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On 23.12.2012 21:31, Don Armstrong wrote: > >In making a fix to the RC bug #684817, I also fixed a problem in > >disabling optimization when noopt is present, and a patch which fixes > >an install-in

Bug#697726: marked as done (unblock: vinagre/3.4.2-2)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 12:51:10 +0100 with message-id <20130119115110.gv5...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#697726: unblock: vinagre/3.4.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #697726, regarding unblock: vinagre/3.4.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#697749: marked as done (unblock: gtk+3.0/3.4.2-5)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 12:55:18 +0100 with message-id <20130119115518.gw5...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#697749: unblock: gtk+3.0/3.4.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #697749, regarding unblock: gtk+3.0/3.4.2-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#698039: marked as done (nmu: pygtk_2.24.0-3)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 12:58:00 +0100 with message-id <20130119115800.gx5...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#698039: nmu: pygtk_2.24.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #698039, regarding nmu: pygtk_2.24.0-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#697957: unblock: connman/1.0-1.1

Control: reopen -1 On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 23:59 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Please unblock package connman > > connman/1.0-1.1 contains just one patch from upstream which fixes the > vulnerability CVE-2012-6459 [1]. I am attaching the debdiff. Unfortunately it's also picked up a dep

Processed: Re: Bug#697957: unblock: connman/1.0-1.1

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #697957 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" } [release.debian.org] unblock: connman/1.0-1.1 Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #697957 to the same values previously set -- 697957: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=69795

Bug#698467: RE : Bug#698467: unblock: taurus/3.0.0-2

>The diff you sent doesn't contain these patches... Sorry about that, I did the debdiff with the .dsc but. So here the 2 patches Cheers FredFrom: =?UTF-8?q?Picca=20Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric-Emmanuel?= Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:20:39 +0100 Subject: upstream fix for the FTBFS due to image conversion -

Bug#670114: marked as done (nmu: shogun_1.1.0-4)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 13:06:11 +0100 with message-id <20130119120611.gy5...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#670114: nmu: shogun_1.1.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #670114, regarding nmu: shogun_1.1.0-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#675539: marked as done (nmu: omake_0.9.8.5-3-8)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 13:08:11 +0100 with message-id <20130119120811.gz5...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#675539: nmu: omake_0.9.8.5-3-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #675539, regarding nmu: omake_0.9.8.5-3-8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#697957: unblock: connman/1.0-1.1

On 01/19/2013 01:06 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: reopen -1 On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 23:59 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Please unblock package connman connman/1.0-1.1 contains just one patch from upstream which fixes the vulnerability CVE-2012-6459 [1]. I am attaching the debdiff

Bug#693550: marked as done (unblock: mame/0.146-5)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 13:14:51 +0100 with message-id <20130119121451.ga5...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#693550: unblock: mame/0.146-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #693550, regarding unblock: mame/0.146-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#693562: marked as done (unblock: mess/0.146-4)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 13:14:51 +0100 with message-id <20130119121451.ga5...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#693550: unblock: mame/0.146-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #693562, regarding unblock: mess/0.146-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Processed: tagging 694322

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 694322 + confirmed Bug #694322 [release.debian.org] unblock: rgl/0.92.798-1 Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 694322: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694

Bug#694322: unblock: src:rgl/0.92.798-1

On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 17:03:33 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > I tried to rebuild the package prepared by Laszlo without the added > debian/compat, so resulting debdiff attached. At first glance it looks > okay to me. > > The lintian override probably was added, as the embedded-library tag

Bug#696460: marked as done (tag #599523 wheezy-ignore)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 12:27:01 + with message-id <1358598421.12995.43.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#696460: tag #599523 wheezy-ignore has caused the Debian Bug report #696460, regarding tag #599523 wheezy-ignore to be marked as done. This means th

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: rails_2.3.5-1.2+squeeze5_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1twxma-0001qv...@franck.debian.org

Bug#697691: preapproval unblock: dspam/3.10.1+dfsg-7

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 16:01:06 +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package dspam > > [this is a preapproval unblock request] > > Bug #695275 "harmful actions in

Bug#697140: marked as done (Bug#697140: unblock: zangband/1:2.7.5pre1-8)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 13:35:00 +0100 with message-id <20130119123500.gd5...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#697140: unblock: zangband/1:2.7.5pre1-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #697140, regarding Bug#697140: unblock: zangband/1:2.7.5pre1-8 to be marked as done. This m

Re: Stable upload request - Fw: Bug#690151: claws-mail: CVE-2012-4507

On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 20:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 20:08 +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote: > > As requested by Jonathan, I've prepared an upload with the minimal changes > > required for fixing this, debdiff attached. [...] > In any case, please go ahead; thanks. Flagge

Bug#689003: marked as done (unblock: bacula/5.2.6+dfsg-5)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 13:45:45 +0100 with message-id <20130119124545.ge5...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#689003: unblock: bacula/5.2.6+dfsg-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #689003, regarding unblock: bacula/5.2.6+dfsg-5 to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#696671: tpu: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u3

On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 11:19:18PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > As seen in #695810 (merged with #486520), ifupdown switched to calling > dhclient with the -1 option, and in past releases it had not, so it is > now a more prevalent problem. Although sure severity is questionable, > and I'm not w

Re: Update virinst via wheezy-proposed-updates

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:53:09PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:18 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > > the tools from virtinst will fail to do anything useful with a bad > > locale sitting. The patch is simple and cherry-picked from upstream. > > Would this be a case to be f

Processed: tagging 698467

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 698467 - moreinfo Bug #698467 [release.debian.org] unblock: taurus/3.0.0-2 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 698467: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: qemu-kvm_0.12.5+dfsg-5+squeeze10_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: qemu-kvm_0.12.5+dfsg-5+squeeze10_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: qemu_0.12.5+dfsg-3squeeze3_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: qemu_0.12.5+dfsg-3squeeze3_armel.change

Processed: Re: Bug#694975: release.debian.org: Wheezy-ignore tag for freecad and netgen

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #694975 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Wheezy-ignore tag for freecad and netgen Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 694975: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694975 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#694975: release.debian.org: Wheezy-ignore tag for freecad and netgen

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sun, 2012-12-02 at 21:53 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > please, consider a granting a wheezy-ignore tag for bugs > #617613 (freecad) and #618968 (netgen). > > Both bugs are license issues, which are, seems to be "fixed", > but not in Wheezy. It is impossible to make a

Bug#695570: RM: pydoubles/1.4-2

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:43:13 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On 10.12.2012 10:26, David Villa Alises wrote: > >doublex package supersedes pydoubles providing its legacy API as a > >wrapper. > > doublex isn't in testing, however (and indeed has only been in > u

Bug#695808: marked as done (RM: gnat-4.4/4.4.6-6)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 14:07:15 +0100 with message-id <20130119130715.gf5...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#695808: RM: gnat-4.4/4.4.6-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #695808, regarding RM: gnat-4.4/4.4.6-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#694322: unblock: src:rgl/0.92.798-1

Hi Julien On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 01:18:36PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 17:03:33 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > I tried to rebuild the package prepared by Laszlo without the added > > debian/compat, so resulting debdiff attached. At first glance it looks > >

Bug#698502: unblock: glusterfs/3.2.7-4

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package glusterfs It fixes the security bug #693112 aka CVE-2012-4417. diff -Naur '--exclude=.svn' 3.2.7-3/debian/changelog 3.2.7-4/debian/changelog --- 3.2.7-3/debian/cha

Bug#695570: RM: pydoubles/1.4-2

Hi, Yes, python-doublex superspeeds it and it is already at debian. Cheers On Jan 19, 2013 2:08 PM, "Julien Cristau" wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:43:13 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > > > On 10.12.2012 10:26, David Villa Alises wrote: > > >doublex pack

Bug#698245: unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy2

On 01/17/2013 10:15 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: Please include the CVEs in the changelog entry, as done for the latest entry: they are important for security problems tracking. They are available in the mail I forwarded to you in private. (CVE-2012-6098 to CVE-2012-6106). Hi Didier, CVE nu

Bug#694975: release.debian.org: Wheezy-ignore tag for freecad and netgen

Hi Adam, thanks for looking into this bug. VCS of coin3d has a COPYING file, which is clearly BSD-license [1]. So this version should be packaged to fix the license issue properly. The current version of coin is GPL [2]. Thanks Anton [1] https://bitbucket.org/Coin3D/coin/src/abc9f50968c926643

Bug#695570: RM: pydoubles/1.4-2

On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 14:21 +0100, David Villa wrote: > Yes, python-doublex superspeeds it and it is already at debian. It's not in wheezy, and won't be. I'll include my earlier mail again below, just to make sure that you're really clear that if we go ahead with this then your package *will not b

Bug#697764: unblock: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-4

On 19.01.2013 12:35, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 14:51:55 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >> In case you are wondering, why the gvfs Breaks was kept: We noticed in >> our upgrade tests, that only packages with an (indirect) dependency on >> libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 were causing problems.

Re: Bug#690151: Stable upload request - Fw: Bug#690151: claws-mail: CVE-2012-4507

On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 12:43:02 + "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 20:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 20:08 +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote: > > > As requested by Jonathan, I've prepared an upload with the minimal > > > changes required for fixing this, de

Bug#687731: marked as done (Stable update for xen)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 15:17:32 +0100 with message-id <20130119141732.gk5...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#687731: Stable update for xen has caused the Debian Bug report #687731, regarding Stable update for xen to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#697691: preapproval unblock: dspam/3.10.1+dfsg-7

Le samedi 19 janvier 2013 13:31:59, vous avez écrit : > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 16:01:06 +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: unblock > > > > Please unblock package dspam > > > > [this

Bug#686547: unblock: calibre/0.8.64+dfsg-1

On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:49:44 +, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 00:22 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: > > And after discussion with Christian and -devel/-mentors, the updated > > package is available at > > http://www.sk2.org/calibre/calibre_0.8.51+dfsg1-0.1.dsc with the same > > c

Bug#686547: unblock: calibre/0.8.64+dfsg-1

Quoting Stephen Kitt (st...@sk2.org): > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:49:44 +, "Adam D. Barratt" > wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 00:22 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: > > > And after discussion with Christian and -devel/-mentors, the updated > > > package is available at > > > http://www.sk2.org/calibr

Bug#692911: unblock: ca-certificates/20121114 (?)

Hello dear release team, It seems that this package is now safe to unblock as Thijs mentioned on Jan 2nd, so this mail is sent as a gentle ping, while I'm using some time to review bugs fixed in sid and not yet in wheezythis one being the first I review this way..:-) -- signature.asc Des

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: claws-mail_3.7.6-4+squeeze1_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1twart-0008wo...@franck.debian.o

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: claws-mail_3.7.6-4+squeeze1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: claws-mail_3.7.6-4+squeeze1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: claws-mail_3.7.6-4+squeeze1_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.deb

Bug#692911: ca-certificates: Unneeded and confusing usage of interest-noawait

Hi! As discussed in 537051 the NMU introduced an unneeded and confusing usage of interest-noawait, and the accompanying Pre-Depends on dpkg. The attached patch removes these. Thanks, Guillem From 3593dbf704952575294b44dbd97d3026ed7429f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Sat, 19

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: claws-mail_3.7.6-4+squeeze1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1twbzr-000219...@franck.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#698502: unblock: glusterfs/3.2.7-4

Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #698502 [release.debian.org] unblock: glusterfs/3.2.7-4 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 698502: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698502 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Bug#697691: preapproval unblock: dspam/3.10.1+dfsg-7

On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 15:50:31 +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > In fine you decide wether it's fine or not for tpu. If you don't want this > I'll comply for the tpu upload. I put it back because I assumed it was the > recommended procedure. It's mentionned several time in policy bug #621833

Bug#698502: unblock: glusterfs/3.2.7-4

Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 14:27:47 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > +diff -Naur glusterfs-3.2.7.orig/libglusterfs/src/statedump.c > glusterfs-3.2.7/libglusterfs/src/statedump.c > +--- glusterfs-3.2.7.orig/libglusterfs/src/statedump.c 2012-06-10 > 19:44:15.0 +0200

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: claws-mail_3.7.6-4+squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1twbnx-0007ml...@franck.debian.org

Bug#698516: unblock: graphite-carbon/0.9.10-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, please unblock graphite-carbon 0.9.10-3 from sid. The new version fixes two bugs (#696228): - internal carbon logrotate confuses l

Bug#692911: Bug#537051: ca-certificates: Unneeded and confusing usage of interest-noawait

On 01/19/2013 10:41 AM, Guillem Jover wrote: > As discussed in 537051 the NMU introduced an unneeded and confusing > usage of interest-noawait, and the accompanying Pre-Depends on dpkg. > The attached patch removes these. Thanks for the patch. I'll get this tested out as soon as I can and get an

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: claws-mail_3.7.6-4+squeeze1_armel.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1twcvu-00085j...@franck.debian.org

Bug#698517: unblock: pam-pgsql/0.7.3.1-4

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package pam-pgsql The version I just uploaded to unstable contains a fix for CVE-2013-0191 [1], [2]. [1] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2013-0191 [2] http:/

Re: linux-2.6 update for stable?

On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 14:19 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > Ben, > > am Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:16:30AM + hast du folgendes geschrieben: > > We have a huge number of important fixes from 2.6.32.60 pending in svn, > > plus two SCSI driver updates (hpsa and megaraid_sas). > > > > Does anyone expec

Bug#690411: unblock: scim-chewing/0.3.4-1.2

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:43:24AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > I've prepared an NMU (diff attached) for testing-proposed-updates > as 0.3.4-1.2 which simply pulls the gtk patch out of the > unstable changes and makes no other changes. > > Please confirm that this is OK to upload to t-p-u. I rev

Bug#696608: unlock: lilypond/2.14.2-4 (preapproval)

On Sat, 19 Jan 2013, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 19:43:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On 23.12.2012 21:31, Don Armstrong wrote: > > >In making a fix to the RC bug #684817, I also fixed a problem in > > >disabling optimization when noop

Bug#692011: taxbird: version in testing (0.16.x) is completely useless

On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 08:46:50PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 21/12/12 12:33, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > On 2012-12-21 12:04, Toni Mueller wrote: > >>> In practice, isn't taxbird dead and therefore unlikely to change at > >>> all in the future? I think if we include it in wheezy, we

Bug#698517: marked as done (unblock: pam-pgsql/0.7.3.1-4)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 18:59:59 + with message-id <1358621999.12995.58.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#698517: unblock: pam-pgsql/0.7.3.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #698517, regarding unblock: pam-pgsql/0.7.3.1-4 to be marked as done. This me

Bug#698516: marked as done (unblock: graphite-carbon/0.9.10-3)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 19:02:28 + with message-id <1358622148.12995.59.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#698516: unblock: graphite-carbon/0.9.10-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #698516, regarding unblock: graphite-carbon/0.9.10-3 to be marked as done

Bug#686547: marked as done (t-p-u approval: calibre/0.8.51+dfsg1-0.1)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 19:07:42 + with message-id <1358622462.12995.60.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#686547: unblock: calibre/0.8.64+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #686547, regarding t-p-u approval: calibre/0.8.51+dfsg1-0.1 to be marked as

Re: Bug#698241: NULL password query result permits login with any password

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:09:39PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > Lucas Clemente Vella discovered that pam-pgsql (aka pam_pgsql) might > allow login with any password the SQL query for the password returns > NULL. > > Bug report: > Patch: >

Bug#694850: license RC bug 679980 in cacti: request for release-team opinion for wheezy

Hi, On 12-12-12 22:02, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 10-12-12 10:02, Niels Thykier wrote: >> I'd recommend uploading 4) to experimental, compile a debdiff and send >> it our way. We may have to back down 3) or 1) once we see the debdiff, but > > I have just uploaded cacti version 0.8.8a+dfsg-1 to expe

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: claws-mail_3.7.6-4+squeeze1_s390.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1tweth-0002fd...@franck.debian.org

Bug#685248: unblock boinc/7.0.34+dfsg-2

Hi Steffen, Steffen Möller wrote: > I have mentally given up on Wheezy and BOINC. That's unfortunate to hear. What is your advice for the release team? Is the version currently in wheezy appropriate for release, should it be removed, or are there some fixes missing that would make it appropriat

Bug#697691: preapproval unblock: dspam/3.10.1+dfsg-7

Le samedi 19 janvier 2013 18:10:22, Julien Cristau a écrit : > > #621833 is still open, and I'm not aware of any other package doing this > lock thing. So yeah, I'd prefer if it didn't come back now. And then > you can get 621833 to a conclusion some time in the next two years and > do things di

Bug#698381: unblock: ifupdown/0.7.6

Hello, On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 12:20:11 +0100 Julien Cristau wrote: > > ifupdown (0.7.6) unstable; urgency=low > > > > [ Andrew O. Shadura ] > > * Don't configure bridge interfaces as tagged VLAN interfaces > > (Closes: #696642). > Why is this not a configuration bug (using a name with "."

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: claws-mail_3.7.6-4+squeeze1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1twgux-00022k...@franck.debian.org

Bug#697957: unblock: connman/1.0-1.1

Rebuilt for testing now and uploaded into t-p-u. Cheers, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Bug#698538: unblock: ca-certificates-java/20121112+nmu1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 (requesting unblock, although I am not the maintainer) Please unblock package ca-certificates-java ca-certificates-java/20121112+nmu1 provi

Processed: tagging 692911, retitle 692911 to unblock: ca-certificates/20130119

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 692911 + pending Bug #692911 [release.debian.org] unblock: ca-certificates/20121114 Added tag(s) pending. > retitle 692911 unblock: ca-certificates/20130119 Bug #692911 [release.debian.org] unblock: ca-certificates/20121114 Changed Bug

Bug#698434: unblock: mha4mysql-manager/0.53-2

hi, On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Technically, this can map a "0" to a "" - not sure how likely that is in > a "log_this" function, but you(r upstream) might have wanted > "unless(defined($msg));" instead. I've contacted upstream author about this. he thinks that: It