Your message dated Thu, 17 Jan 2013 08:27:04 +
with message-id <4b324d631b46ad4d8615c5c906aba...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#697975: unblock: libproc-processtable-perl/0.45-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #697975,
regarding unblock: libproc-processtable-perl/0.45-5
t
Your message dated Thu, 17 Jan 2013 08:48:07 +
with message-id <40b1c426df5f318ad1bfddbc7eea5...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#697960: unblock: fusesmb/0.8.7-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #697960,
regarding unblock: fusesmb/0.8.7-1.2
to be marked as done.
This mea
Control: retitle -1 tpu: package moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy2
(CC'ing the security team for information)
Hi Thomasz, and thanks for this upload proposal,
Le mardi, 15 janvier 2013 22.35:54, Tomasz Muras a écrit :
> Please unblock package moodle
>
> I am about to get new version of the package
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 tpu: package moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy2
Bug #698245 [release.debian.org] unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy2
Changed Bug title to 'tpu: package moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy2' from
'unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy2'
--
698245: http://bugs.deb
On 2013-01-16 14:16, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
The severity of this issue doesn't warrant a DSA. Please fix it
through a stable point update instead:
Okay.
(Uploaded to queue for stable, now up to the point release folks...)
This should be discussed with the release team *before* upload...
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
I've got confirmation from "Francesco P. Lovergine" ,
member of pkg-grass team to ask for removal of spatialite-tools from
testing due to the removal of its dependency libreadosm1.
Kind reg
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Release Team
Please unblock package libdigest-sha-perl
libdigest-sha-perl 5.71-2 fixes #698172: "Fix double-free when loading
Digest::SH
On 2013-01-17 10:20, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
>
> Hi,
>
> I've got confirmation from "Francesco P. Lovergine" ,
> member of pkg-grass team to ask for removal of spatialite-tools from
> testi
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:28:25AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-01-17 10:20, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: rm
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've got confirmation from "Francesco P. Lover
Your message dated Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:39:02 +0100
with message-id <50f7c6b6.1010...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#698342: unblock: libdigest-sha-perl/5.71-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #698342,
regarding unblock: libdigest-sha-perl/5.71-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:28:25AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> Confirmation being [1], but spatialite-tools appears to never have been
> in testing.
Ahh, so you mean the source package, right:
http://packages.debian.org/source/wheezy/spatialite
Please remove spatialite not (spatialite-to
Your message dated Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:47:52 +0100
with message-id <50f7c8c8.20...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#698341: RM: spatialite-tools/3.0.0~beta20110817-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #698341,
regarding RM: spatialite-tools/3.0.0~beta20110817-3
to be marked as done.
This means
Oops.
Dear Release team,
Please consider for the next point release this tiny patch to ettercap
addressing CVE-2013-0722.
--Barak.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list
I hope my explanations helped to clarify these tiny, but for the user
experience enormously helpful patches.
How do you plan to proceed with this?
Thanks,
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
I messed-up the amd64 package when uploading it. Could you please rebuild it,
this will fix #698115.
Thanks
nmu dicom3tools_1.0~20121227-1 . amd64 . -m "fix #698115"
-- System Inform
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ifupdown. This release fixes some important issues with
ifupdown,
and also brings upstart support up to date.
ifupdown (0.7.6) unstable; urgency=low
[ Andrew O. S
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 686547 - moreinfo
Bug #686547 [release.debian.org] unblock: calibre/0.8.64+dfsg-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
686547: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 686547 t-p-u approval: calibre/0.8.51+dfsg1-0.1
Bug #686547 [release.debian.org] unblock: calibre/0.8.64+dfsg-1
Changed Bug title to 't-p-u approval: calibre/0.8.51+dfsg1-0.1' from 'unblock:
calibre/0.8.64+dfsg-1'
> thanks
Stopping proces
Hello,
I forgot to note (once again), the updated package is *not* yet
uploaded, so I'd like to have a review/approval/critics so I can
proceed.
--
WBR, Andrew
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:36:07 +, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> Oops.
>
> Dear Release team,
>
> Please consider for the next point release this tiny patch to ettercap
> addressing CVE-2013-0722.
>
There's no patch in your mail.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatu
#695716 is a GFDL-bug, upstream has relicensed their docs and released a
new version 0.6.7, I have updated the package and uploaded to unstable.
unfortunately, the new version also contains other changes, so I don't
think 0.6.7 can progress to testing.
I was hoping we could wheezy-ignore this b
> There's no patch in your mail.
Yeah, that's because I already dput it to stable...
But, patch below.
--Barak.
commit 0e889d37cf5a268f0116005c21d1c9476e7e5ed5 (origin/squeeze, squeeze)
Auth
On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 19:40 +, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> +-enum {
> +- NS_IN6ADDRSZ= 16,
> +- NS_INT16SZ = 2,
[...]
> ++#define NS_IN6ADDRSZ 16
> ++#define NS_INT16SZ = 2
That second change looks wrong to me. (For the avoidance of doubt, the
"=".)
Rega
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:51:13 +
Robert Lemmen wrote:
> #695716 is a GFDL-bug, upstream has relicensed their docs and released a
> new version 0.6.7, I have updated the package and uploaded to unstable.
... which won't get into testing.
> unfortunately, the new version also contains other ch
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:50:34PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> Why couldn't an upload of cgdb 0.6.6-3 have been made with only the
> changes to the docs licensing?
this is a source package problem, so it would have to be a
0.6.6+dfsg1-1 with repackaged source.
> Would have been easier if you'
> That second change looks wrong to me. (For the avoidance of doubt, the
> "=".)
Yeah, it is a bogus =. Can't believe it was missed.
In any case, these two #define's (NS_IN6ADDRSZ and NS_INT16SZ) are
shadowed by others, so that code is dead and they can be removed.
26 matches
Mail list logo
