Bug#629329: pu: package sphinx/0.6.6-3+squeeze1

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 21:06:39 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 18:48 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > I'd like to upload new version of Sphinx into s-p-u, which fixes > > compatibility with jQuery >= 1.4. (Upstream ships a copy of jQuery > > 1.2.6, but in Debian we use the pa

Bug#629329: pu: package sphinx/0.6.6-3+squeeze1

Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 09:34 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 21:06:39 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 18:48 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > > I'd like to upload new version of Sphinx into s-p-u, which fixes > > > compatibi

Processed: Re: Bug#629329: pu: package sphinx/0.6.6-3+squeeze1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #629329 [release.debian.org] pu: package sphinx/0.6.6-3+squeeze1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 629329: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629329 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBS

Bug#697893: marked as done (unblock: tex-common/3.15)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:11:32 + with message-id <1357895492.32456.8.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#697893: unblock: tex-common/3.15 has caused the Debian Bug report #697893, regarding unblock: tex-common/3.15 to be marked as done. This means that

Re: [Pkg-ace-devel] Bug#697847: missing source for Win32 binaries

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 09:26:37PM +0100, Thomas Girard wrote: > Since my GPG key has expired, I will not be able to upload this in a > timely fashion, so you can consider this email as a call for NMU. > For info, you can simply change the expiration date... Neil -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d

Bug#694614: tpu: cairo-dock/3.0.0-3 (pre-approval)

Hi, On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 13:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> I have to admit I'm slightly confused by the patches for #676841. >> According to the bug log, upstream indicated that the issue was related >

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: gzip_1.3.12-9+squeeze1_ia64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1tteik-0006rz...@franck.debian.org

Bug#697929: unblock: libapache2-mod-perl2/2.0.7-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libapache2-mod-perl2 This fixes a sporadic FTBFS bug. I assume you'd like to have this in wheezy to avoid it causing problems during security updates/point releases.

Bug#694614: tpu: cairo-dock/3.0.0-3 (pre-approval)

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo + confirmed On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 20:10 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > I deleted these patches and applied the patch for correcting #676841 from > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cairo-dock-team/cairo-dock-core/cairo-dock/revision/1075. > Would you check this? +cairo-d

Processed: Re: Bug#694614: tpu: cairo-dock/3.0.0-3 (pre-approval)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo + confirmed Bug #694614 [release.debian.org] tpu: cairo-dock/3.0.0-3 (pre-approval) Removed tag(s) moreinfo. Bug #694614 [release.debian.org] tpu: cairo-dock/3.0.0-3 (pre-approval) Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 694614: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin

Bug#697929: marked as done (unblock: libapache2-mod-perl2/2.0.7-2)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:12:36 + with message-id <1357913556.32456.11.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#697929: unblock: libapache2-mod-perl2/2.0.7-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #697929, regarding unblock: libapache2-mod-perl2/2.0.7-2 to be marked

Re: Bug#697025: gstreamer0.10: please re-upload built against GLib 2.32

On 09/01/13 21:54, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 09.01.2013 22:29, Simon McVittie wrote: >> As far as I can work out, bumping libgstreamer0.10-0's shlibs >> would only help to achieve this if we additionally NMU a bunch of >> packages to rebuild them against the new libgstreamer0.10-0 so >> they get a

Bug#697547: unblock: tpu (pre-approval) qcontrol/0.4.2-7+wheezy2

On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 22:13 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i > > On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 20:03 +, Ian Campbell wrote: > > Please unblock package qcontrol > > > > The fix in +wheezy1 (unblock request #694267) was incomplete because it > > relied > > on the --dire

Bug#697957: unblock: connman/1.0-1.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package connman connman/1.0-1.1 contains just one patch from upstream which fixes the vulnerability CVE-2012-6459 [1]. I am attaching the debdiff. Cheers, Adrian unblock c

Bug#697959: unblock: drupal7/7.14-1.2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package drupal7 7.14-1.2 backports the patch between 7.17 and 7.18, which fixes one arbitrary code execution and one information disclosure vulnerability: http://drupal.org/

Bug#697960: unblock: fusesmb/0.8.7-1.2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package fusesmb I just rebuilt fusesmb changing its dependency from fuse-utils (a virtual package) to fuse. The debdiff between freshly built source packages is quite trivial

Bug#697959: unblock: drupal7/7.14-1.2

Gunnar Wolf dijo [Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 06:09:38PM -0600]: > Please unblock package drupal7 > > 7.14-1.2 backports the patch between 7.17 and 7.18, which fixes one > arbitrary code execution and one information disclosure vulnerability: And of course, although I completely forgot to mention it eit