Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please consider pre-approving reprepro/4.12.5-1
(not yet uploaded, would go via unstable)
It is a new upstream release which contains only documentation
improvements and some small changes
Your message dated Tue, 01 Jan 2013 09:52:04 +
with message-id <889dad58b548fd8d35a9deaddde47...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#697078: tpu: xdotool/1:2.20100701.2961-3+deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #697078,
regarding tpu: xdotool/1:2.20100701.2961-3+deb7u1
to be
Your message dated Tue, 1 Jan 2013 13:56:05 +0100
with message-id <20130101125605.go5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#697005: unblock: freebsd-utils/9.0+ds1-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #697005,
regarding unblock: freebsd-utils/9.0+ds1-9
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Tue, 1 Jan 2013 13:56:27 +0100
with message-id <20130101125627.gp5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#697006: unblock: freebsd-libs/9.0+ds1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #697006,
regarding unblock: freebsd-libs/9.0+ds1-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 13:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I have to admit I'm slightly confused by the patches for #676841.
> According to the bug log, upstream indicated that the issue was related
> to optimisation when compiled with GCC 4.7, and that the fix was the
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #694614 [release.debian.org] tpu: cairo-dock/3.0.0-3 (pre-approval)
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #694614 to the same tags previously set
--
694614: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694614
Debian Bug Tracking System
Co
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 22:56:52 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 30/11/12 12:51, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Before rebuilding the world, I'd like to avoid breaking partial
> > upgrades.
>
> Here is an attempt at a better list of packages via better choice of
> regexps, with notes on methodology
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 23:28:13 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Here is a proposed (sourceful) NMU. Release team, does this look OK? I
> pulled in a couple of trivial changes from pkg-gst git (but not
> "debian/rules: Delete all .la files", which seems undesirable during a
> freeze).
>
> I've onl
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
I'd like to see if it's feasible to upload a targeted fix to testing-proposed-
updates to address #662854.
This bug has been fixed in unstable already, also introducing changes [0] which
sh
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 16:59 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> open-vm-tools in Wheezy is affected by #695845. The init script for
> open-vm-tools calls a executable in /usr but the init script does not
> have a runtime dependency on $remote_fs.
>
> This was fixed i
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #697101 [release.debian.org] tpu: freerdp/1.0.1-1.1+deb7u1 (pre-approval)
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
697101: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697101
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2013-01-01 at 14:54 +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> I'd like to see if it's feasible to upload a targeted fix to testing-proposed-
> updates to address #662854.
>
> This bug has been fixed in unstable already, also introducing changes [0]
> which
> should not
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #696738 [release.debian.org] tpu:
open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-1+nmu2 (pre-approval)
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
696738: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696738
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 10:58 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> fuse package has RC bug #696066 in wheezy. Previously (in Squeeze) the
> package shiped /usr/share/doc/fuse-utils as symlink but in Wheezy
> fuse-utils is only a transitional package. dpkg overwrites
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed d-i
Bug #696713 [release.debian.org] tpu: fuse/2.9.0-2+deb7u1 (pre-approval)
Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed.
--
696713: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696713
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem
Salvatore Bonaccorso (26/12/2012):
> The changes to the debian/*.install files come due to my build host
> beeing on amd64.
I know this isn't your fault, but that's really sad to see such cruft
ending up debdiffs.
> fuse also provides a udeb, so this will need also an ack from d-i?
Yep; d-i ACK
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:33:42 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hi,
>
> before uploading munin 2.0.6-2 to unstable I would like to ask for
> pre-approval of these changes: 2 serio
I hadn't realized the patch added new symbols (altough they're quite
harmless), and I had to refresh debian/libfreerdp1.symbols
accordingly. Full debdiff of the changes is attached.
Otavio, as freerdp is listed as LowNMU, I uploaded it to DELAYED/5.
1.0.1-1.1+deb7u1.debdiff
Description: Binary d
Your message dated Tue, 01 Jan 2013 17:20:10 +
with message-id <1357060810.15480.26.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#695804: unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy0
has caused the Debian Bug report #695804,
regarding unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy1 pre-approv
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package i3-wm
The only change is a backported trivial patch to fix resizing of
floating windows by keyboard, see #696758. The patch itself was applied
upstream at 2012-08-18
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 05:10:22AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian (21/11/2012):
> > LTSP does contain the ltsp-client builder .udeb, though no code in
> > the .udeb itself was changed, and the ltsp-client-builder is not
> > used in the default installer.
I've now tested that th
> Hi Harald,
Hi Jonathan
>
> Harald Jenny wrote:
>
> > I have retitled the bug request to
> >
> > unblock: openswan/1:2.6.38-1
> >
> > The version is now in unstable and awaits your (hopefully positive)
> > decision.
>
> debdiff attached for reference. diffstat:
>
> 598 files changed, 11061
Hi!
2012/12/28 Paul Gevers :
> [...]
> Some remarks:
> - The package is in unstable now.
> - The debdiff in the first message is the same as created from the
> archive by "debdiff packagekit_0.7.6-1.dsc packagekit_0.7.6-2.dsc"
> - It would be good to mention bug numbers against packagekit and/or
>
Your message dated Tue, 1 Jan 2013 20:44:05 +0100
with message-id <20130101194405.gw5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#697129: unblock: i3-wm/4.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #697129,
regarding unblock: i3-wm/4.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Tue, 01 Jan 2013 20:17:50 +
with message-id <1357071470.15480.38.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#688698: pre-approve unblock:
nvidia-graphics-drivers/304.51-1, nvidia-settings/304.51-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #688698,
regarding pre-app
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 14:49 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:45:46AM +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote:
> > At 25 Nov 2012 19:56:11 +0100,
> > "Julien Cristau" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'll upload cairo-dock-core (3.0.0-3, fix RC bugs) and send unblock
> > > > request.
> > > >
>
Your message dated Tue, 1 Jan 2013 21:34:33 +0100
with message-id <20130101203433.ga3...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#692744: release.debian.org: RM:
cairo-dock-core/3.1.0-1 in unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #692744,
regarding unblock: cairo-dock/3.0.0-3 (TPU)
to be marked as done
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 694790 + moreinfo
Bug #694790 [release.debian.org] unblock: munin/2.0.6-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
694790: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694790
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package zangband
zangband/1:2.7.5pre1-7 fixes two serious issues with the debian/copyright
file: #696916 [1] and #696919 [2]. Both issues are considered RC bugs
for the upcom
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 14:02:30 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I would much prefer if this was a 5.2.6+dfsg-7 version, uploaded to sid,
> and including only the approved changes, rather than a direct upload to
> testing.
>
Ping?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 14:54:32 +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> I'd like to see if it's feasible to upload a targeted fix to testing-proposed-
> updates to address #662854.
>
> T
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:23:51 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
>
> 0.1.999 was a pre-release uploaded before the freeze, while 0.2 was uploaded
> shortly after the release and besides
Your message dated Tue, 1 Jan 2013 23:43:08 +0100
with message-id <20130101224308.gz5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#695935: RM: nipy/0.1.999-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #695935,
regarding RM: nipy/0.1.999-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 675539 + moreinfo
Bug #675539 [release.debian.org] nmu: omake_0.9.8.5-3-8
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
675539: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675539
В Tue, 1 Jan 2013 23:35:35 +0100
Julien Cristau пишет:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 14:02:30 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > I would much prefer if this was a 5.2.6+dfsg-7 version, uploaded to
> > sid, and including only the approved changes, rather than a direct
> > upload to testing.
> >
> Pi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package snack
snack/2.2.10-dfsg1-12.1 contains just one patch by Michael Karcher
which fixes the vulnerability CVE-2012-6303 [1]. The package is
otherwise unchanged. As repor
Thanks!
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:23:51 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: rm
> > 0.1.999 was a pre-release uploaded before the freeze, w
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2013 06:19:43 +
with message-id <1357107583.15480.41.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#697160: unblock: snack/2.2.10-dfsg1-12.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #697160,
regarding unblock: snack/2.2.10-dfsg1-12.1
to be marked as done.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package parted
The NMU I uploaded yesterdaty includes 3 upstream patches
cherry-picked by Jérémy Bobbio to fix #673042 (loses 'legacy BIOS
bootable' flag on GPT disks).
NMU
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libnfnetlink
This upload cherry-picks an upstream fix to deal with
#684863 ("Conntrackd fails to start. No dedicated link detected.").
debdiff attached
unblock libn
Hi Adam
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 03:05:23PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 16:59 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > open-vm-tools in Wheezy is affected by #695845. The init script for
> > open-vm-tools calls a executable in /usr but the i
Hi KiBi and Adam
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 05:12:16PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Salvatore Bonaccorso (26/12/2012):
> > The changes to the debian/*.install files come due to my build host
> > beeing on amd64.
>
> I know this isn't your fault, but that's really sad to see such cruft
> ending u
Hi,
Julien Cristau wrote:
> I'm considering an update to libdrm for wheezy, to get newer hw support
> on radeon and intel. Upstream changed the libdrm_nouveau API/ABI in the
> mean time, so this update would revert nouveau to the current state in
> wheezy (2.4.33-3).
FWIW I think this would be
43 matches
Mail list logo
