Hi Adam,
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 07:23:00AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 07:53 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > while poco seems to be removed from testing due to some longer standing
> > RC bugs there are packages (build-)depending from it
On 13.09.2012 08:26, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 07:23:00AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 07:53 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> while poco seems to be removed from testing due to some longer
standing
> RC bugs there are packages (build-)depending from it re
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 08:42:34AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [...]
> >
> >http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-med/sitplus.git;a=blob;f=debian/control
> >
> >It lists libpoco-dev as Build-Depends and #680798 is exactly about
> >the
> >lack of the required Build-Depends.
>
> Indeed. As
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear release managers,
I'd like to upload a new upstream version of the German translation of
various manpages. I've added a check in the c
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 unblock: nvidia-graphics-drivers/304.48-1,
> nvidia-settings/304.48-1, nvidia-xconfig/304.48-1,
> nvidia-graphics-modules/304.48+1
Bug #684871 [release.debian.org] unblock: nvidia-graphics-drivers/304.43-1,
nvidia-settings/304.43-1, nvidia-xconfig/304.4
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package aptitude (pre-approve)
The last serious change required for aptitude + multi-arch is to
improve the command line handling. I refer you to [1] and [2] for the
complet
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ruby-mocha, version 0.11.3-3 uploaded in
unstable.
This version fixes RC bug #684860, caused by an improper order of
'require' statement for some particular order of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 687409 by 684963
Bug #687409 [src:voms-api-java] voms-api-java: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat
`target/site/javadoc/apidocs': No such file or directory
687409 was not blocked by any bugs.
687409 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 6
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-173xx
The changes are a fix for CVE-2012-4225 and the other changes are a
synchronisation of the packaging with nvidia-graphics-drivers
Your message dated Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:16:45 +0200
with message-id <5051c09d.1060...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683303: unblock: kvirc/4:4.1.3+2024.svn5988-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #683303,
regarding unblock: kvirc/4:4.1.3+2024.svn5988-2
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:20:10 +0200
with message-id <5051c16a.5080...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#687466: unblock: scim-canna/1.0.0-4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #687466,
regarding unblock: scim-canna/1.0.0-4.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:26:31 +0200
with message-id <5051c2e7.7090...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#687494: unblock: ruby-mocha/0.11.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #687494,
regarding unblock: ruby-mocha/0.11.3-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:43:22 +0200
with message-id <5051c6da.4090...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686708: unblock: mailsync/5.2.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #686708,
regarding unblock: mailsync/5.2.2-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On 05/09/12 05:11, David Prévot wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
icecast2 in Sid ships a new upstream release. In order to fix the RC-bug
#686181 and the relevant translation update, I ask permission to upload
a 2.
Your message dated Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:51:31 +0200
with message-id <5051c8c3.8080...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685803: unblock (pre-approval): vala-0.16/0.16.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #685803,
regarding unblock: vala-0.16/0.16.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
On 15/08/12 10:11, James Page wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
During recent rebuilt testing in wheezy, FTBFS where recorded for
wagon2 (#684841), jenkins (#684826),
Your message dated Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:19:25 +0200
with message-id <5051cf4d.1010...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685459: unblock: boinc-app-seti/6.12~svn1385-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #685459,
regarding unblock: boinc-app-seti/6.12~svn1409-1
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 683142 unblock: bdii/5.2.5-2+wheezy1
Bug #683142 [release.debian.org] unblock: bdii/5.2.12-2
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: bdii/5.2.5-2+wheezy1' from 'unblock:
bdii/5.2.12-2'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
On 25/08/12 16:34, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
Hi Release Team,
I plan to take over of python-eventlet . It has a FTBFS bug[1] in Wheezy
due to the bug in python-greenlet [2]. It is fixed, but not migrated to
testing due to an other RC bug[3]. Tried to reach its maintainer, Örjan,
but no suc
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release Team,
I have a package update for slbackup (Debian Edu / Skolelinux Backup System)
that I would love to see unblocked for transition to wheezy once it has been
uploaded to un
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 687526 unblock (pre-approval): slbackup/0.0.12-4
Bug #687526 [release.debian.org] unblock: slbackup/0.0.12-3
Changed Bug title to 'unblock (pre-approval): slbackup/0.0.12-4' from 'unblock:
slbackup/0.0.12-3'
> thanks
Stopping processing h
clone 683142 -1
reassign -1 bdii
retitle -1 bdii: configuration files does not preserve local changes
severity -1 serious
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags -1 =
block 683142 by -1
thanks
On 2012-09-05 13:24, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> fre 2012-08-31 klockan 14:01 +0200 skrev Niels
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 683142 -1
Bug #683142 [release.debian.org] unblock: bdii/5.2.5-2+wheezy1
Bug 683142 cloned as bug 687534
687534 was not blocked by any bugs.
687534 was blocking: 685663
Added blocking bug(s) of 687534: 685663
> reassign -1 bdii
Bug #687534 [
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 687534 with 685663
Bug #687534 [bdii] bdii: configuration files does not preserve local changes
687534 was blocked by: 685663
687534 was blocking: 683142 685663
Removed blocking bug(s) of 687534: 685663
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:34:38PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:37:25 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> > The Release Notes say that 1.19.2 is a security-fix release,
> > and does not list any unrelated changes. Question is, (to the
> > more seasoned MW packagers) can
Hi,
[No offence, just checking]
I was wondering if there can be a response to how likely it is that
cacti can get a unblock to fix bug 681558 [1]. Are the procedure
followed correctly, or did I something wrong? Or do I just need to wait
longer? Upload to experimental maybe?
As Ubuntu is about to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 683674 unblock: intel-microcode/1.20120606.6
Bug #683674 [release.debian.org] unblock: intel-microcode/1.20120606.3
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: intel-microcode/1.20120606.6' from 'unblock:
intel-microcode/1.20120606.3'
> thanks
Stoppin
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package altos. This version fixes RC bug #676739 which
was present at the time of wheezy freeze.
Note that this is a new upstream release that is better in every way
than
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
Please unblock mozc/1.5.1090.102-3.
This version enabled hardening.
And when hardening was enabled, the link error of the library occurred.
This version also fixed this
Hi,
Can I fix this bug with an attached patch?
This patch doesn't contain repacked sources' changes. get-orig-source will
create it.
waf-unpack will be able to extract waf without following upstream changes.
Regards,
--
Koichi Akabe
vbkaisetsu at {gmail.com, debian.or.jp}
diff -urN midori-0.4
Hello again,
Julian Taylor pointed out that this unexpectedly affected uwsgi, as
that started to include "pg_config --cflags", and caused uwsgi to
FTBFS:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687084
This has been fixed in 1.2.3+dfsg-5 now. So we need to coordinate the
unblocking of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Mehdi,
Le 13/09/2012 07:47, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
> On 05/09/12 05:11, David Prévot wrote:
>> I ask permission to upload a 2.3.2-9+deb7u1 version to tpu.
> Sorry for the delay. The diff looks okay. Please go ahead.
Nothing to be sorry about,
Hi,
I noticed that you've uploaded a "mysql-mm" package to the "stable NEW"
queue. However both the version and changelog for the update suggest it
was intended for the backports.d.o archive and there doesn't appear to
have been any discussion regarding the upload on debian-release; please
could
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 06:26:21 +0100
"Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
> I noticed that you've uploaded a "mysql-mm" package to the "stable NEW"
> queue. However both the version and changelog for the update suggest it
> was intended for the backports.d.o archive and there doesn't appear to
> have been
34 matches
Mail list logo
