On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 02:51:43 +0300
"Andrej N. Gritsenko" wrote:
> Hello, Debian Release Team!
Was there something about the thread on -devel which wasn't clear?
> I'm talking about libfm and pcmanfm which entered freeze state two
> months ago and published as 1.0 release in beginning of
Cyril Brulebois (02/09/2012):
> Hi ftpmasters, release team, cd team,
>
> please respectively, do:
> - dak copy-installer
> - urgent d-i
> - start building installation images (I think it needs at least a
>dinstall + a mirror pulse though); putting them into a “dot-dir”
>for the time b
On 03.09.2012 09:31, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Cyril Brulebois (02/09/2012):
- urgent d-i
Done, along with an unblock.
- start building installation images (I think it needs at least a
dinstall + a mirror pulse though); putting them into a “dot-dir”
for the time being would be nice.
Adam D. Barratt (03/09/2012):
> On 03.09.2012 09:31, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >Cyril Brulebois (02/09/2012):
> >> - urgent d-i
>
> Done, along with an unblock.
Thanks.
> >> - start building installation images (I think it needs at least a
> >> dinstall + a mirror pulse though); putting them
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 21:29:25 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Can you also make it age faster?
>
Done.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:09:07 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> I uploaded libpng 1.2.49-3.
> Because version 1.2.49-1 was built with automake 1.11.4-1, this has a problem.
> But 1.2.49-3 was build with automake 1.11.6-1, this problem is fixed.
> Could you unblock libpng 1.2.49-3?
>
That does
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 01:24:24PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:10:17PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > ke, 2012-08-08 kello 01:50 +0200, Cyril Brulebois kirjoitti:
> >
> > > Julian Andres Klode (30/07/2012):
> > > > Since the version of testing, this contai
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 18:16:24 +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package packagekit
>
> PackageKit 0.7.6 is a bugfix-only release, which fixes some bugs (some of t
Your message dated Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:16:43 +0200
with message-id <20120903101643.gv6...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686494: unblock: libreoffice/1:3.5.4+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #686494,
regarding unblock: libreoffice/1:3.5.4+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This means
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:34:46 +0200, Mikołaj Izdebski wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package lbzip2
>
> This package fixes 2 RC and 2 normal bugs, as well as several other
> upstream
Your message dated Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:49:38 +0200
with message-id <20120903104938.gy6...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686111: tpu: pleiades/1.3.4~I20120531-dfsg-2+deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #686111,
regarding tpu: pleiades/1.3.4~I20120531-dfsg-2+deb7u1
to be marked as do
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:59:33 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> The only change is that the package depends on kmod instead of
> module-init-tools now. Debdiff attached.
>
That doesn't really seem like a crucial change right now, the
transitional package won't go away from wheezy. So NAK.
Chee
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
When given the parameter -i, with something like this:
debpear -i
debpear is supposed to download the PEAR package named PKG-Name, then build a
Debian package called php-pkg-name out of i
Your message dated Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:04:58 +0200
with message-id <20120903110458.gz6...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#684297: unblock: atlas/3.8.4-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #684297,
regarding unblock: atlas/3.8.4-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:15:17 +0200
with message-id <20120903111517.gb6...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683211: unblock: worldwind/0.5.0-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #683211,
regarding unblock: worldwind/0.5.0-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
:06:02 +0200
+ -- Thorsten Glaser Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:55:51 +0200
fusionforge (5.2~rc1-5) unstable; urgency=low
Index: db/20120903-no-unix-account-for-deleted-users.sql
===
--- db/20120903-no-unix-account-for-deleted-users.sql (revi
Most of the changes have happened on a PackageKit backend which is not
relevant to Debian, so you can safely ignore these changes.
Anyway, I'll post a list of all commits & changes which were relevant to
Debian and comment on them here, so you don't have to review the stuff
(and can instead just re
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> The diff attached will also need to be added to this upload
> for security reasons.
And this one, too. The forge has public information, such as
a user’s homepage – https://alioth.debian.org/users/tg – and
the https://alioth.debian.org/top/toplist.php?
2012 11:06:02 +0200
+ -- Thorsten Glaser Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:55:51 +0200
fusionforge (5.2~rc1-5) unstable; urgency=low
Index: db/20120903-no-unix-account-for-deleted-users.sql
===
--- db/20120903-no-unix-account-for-delete
Your message dated Mon, 3 Sep 2012 08:37:05 -0400
with message-id
and subject line this was misfiled under release.debian.org, should have been
ftp.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #686533,
regarding RM: fparser/4.5-0.1 -- RoM; RC Buggy, no more rdepends
to be marked as done.
This me
Hi again.
There seems to be another problem with FusionForge, which needs more
investigation maybe to check which other versions are affected.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> The diff attached will also need to be added to this
Hello!
Neil Williams has written on Monday, 3 September, at 8:49:
>On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 02:51:43 +0300
>"Andrej N. Gritsenko" wrote:
>> Tell me what I should do next, please. Thank you in advance!
>There are currently no RC bugs against these packages filed in Debian.
>There is nothing
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 15:58:35 +0300
"Andrej N. Gritsenko" wrote:
> >There are currently no RC bugs against these packages filed in Debian.
> >There is nothing to fix.
>
> I have found some. It is bug #593607 in BTS. It has severity Critical
> but tagged as 'squeeze-ignore' so doesn't appear as
Okay, breaking down the changes:
Check for CancelBackgroundTransactions setting again:
Respect the CancelBackgroundSetting setting again
See
http://gitorious.org/packagekit/packagekit/commit/1423e638600e7fd045b1ced0d584d59519610748
Add GStreamer 1.0 support to the PackageKit plugin:
GStreamer 1.
Hiya,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 09:43:44PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 14:08 +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 11:55:29PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Iain Lane (05/07/2012):
> > > > Please ack an unblock of package pinta. I just uploaded it to
> >
> Wheezy currently has ia32-libs 20120102, so unblocking nvidia-* at the
moment seems like it would just cause a different bunch of issues?
That depends on the future of ia32-libs in wheezy. Has there been a
decision, yet?
I could do the following:
* revert the changes to the *-ia32 packages, ma
* Adam D. Barratt:
>> If that results in correct dependencies then yes, it seems acceptable.
> Any news on that?
Yes. in a somewhat unpleasant way: #684885.
This is solved using another one-line diff.
How should I upload the resulting 1:1.18.1-1wheezy1 package?
Cheers,
-Hilko
--
To UNSUBSC
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # pending unblock request
> block 680825 by 685905
Bug #680825 [src:gromacs] gromacs: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat
`/«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs-mpich/usr/lib/*.so': No such file or directory
680825 was blocked by: 681428
680825 was not blocking any
On 16/01/12 at 21:20 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> ruby1.9.1 is known to be broken on ia64 (see #593141). It currently
> builds only because the test suite is disabled on that architecture, but
> the fact that other Ruby packages fail to build on ia64 doesn't surprise
> me.
>
> Dear release team,
Dear release team,
I've just discovered a nasty interaction that prevents webgen0.4 to
start when ruby-coderay is intalled. Although there is no bug reported
for that, I'm quite confident that it would be RC. I've just uploaded
a pretty minimal fix (debdiff attached). Could you please allow it
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 20:40 +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> * Adam D. Barratt:
>
> >> If that results in correct dependencies then yes, it seems acceptable.
> > Any news on that?
>
> Yes. in a somewhat unpleasant way: #684885.
>
> This is solved using another one-line diff.
>
> How should I uploa
Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:09:41 +0100
with message-id <1346702981.16217.4.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686568: unblock: debpear/0.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #686568,
regarding unblock: debpear/0.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx for one
additional debconf translation.
Sorry about the two unblock requests in close succession. I was
apparently slightly too f
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 21:56 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> I've just discovered a nasty interaction that prevents webgen0.4 to
> start when ruby-coderay is intalled. Although there is no bug reported
> for that, I'm quite confident that it would be RC. I've just uploaded
> a pretty minimal fix
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 19:29 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > Wheezy currently has ia32-libs 20120102, so unblocking nvidia-* at the
> moment seems like it would just cause a different bunch of issues?
>
> That depends on the future of ia32-libs in wheezy. Has there been a
> decision, yet?
ftp-m
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: high
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
please unblock zendframework 1.11.13-1.
Zendframework 1.11.13-1 fixes XML eXternal Entity (XXE) and XML Entity
Expansion (XEE) vulnerabilities in Zend_Dom, Zend_Feed, Zend_Soap
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 23:07 +0200, Frank Habermann wrote:
> please unblock zendframework 1.11.13-1.
>
> Zendframework 1.11.13-1 fixes XML eXternal Entity (XXE) and XML Entity
> Expansion (XEE) vulnerabilities in Zend_Dom, Zend_Feed, Zend_Soap, Zend_XmlRpc
Is the removal of extras/documentation/a
Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2012 22:25:07 +0100
with message-id <1346707507.16217.9.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686615: unblock:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx/96.43.20-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #686615,
regarding unblock: nvidia-graphics-drivers
On Mon 27 Aug 2012 17:08:48 Niels Thykier escribió:
[snip]
Hi Niels! Sune Vuorela asked with upstream and they both reviewed the code to
find that, while it was not very clear, it's actually safe.
> > ++// do not overflow the allocated buffer grupx
> > ++if (offset + cbUPX > grup
Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2012 22:52:45 +0100
with message-id <1346709165.16217.11.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686616: unblock: zendframework 1.11.13-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #686616,
regarding unblock: zendframework 1.11.13-1
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2012 23:04:14 +0100
with message-id <1346709854.16217.12.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685489: unblock: librdf-linkeddata-perl/0.56-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #685489,
regarding unblock: librdf-linkeddata-perl/0.56-1
to be mark
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 09:27 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 684871
>
> Please unblock package libvdpau
>
> Since nvidia-vdpau-driver-ia32 has been turned into an empty
> transitional package we can drop the lib32vdpau1 package and therefore
> remove the unavailable build-dep
Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2012 23:09:20 +0100
with message-id <1346710160.16217.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#681718: unblock: wine/1.4.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #681718,
regarding unblock: wine/1.4.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Mon, 03 Sep 2012 23:17:47 +0100
with message-id <1346710667.16217.16.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685596: unblock: gcc-4.4/4.4.7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #685596,
regarding unblock: gcc-4.4/4.4.7-2
to be marked as done.
This means that
On 2012-09-03 23:07, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 19:29 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> That depends on the future of ia32-libs in wheezy. Has there been a
>> decision, yet?
>
> ftp-master really really want it to go away. Before that can happen we
> need the upgrade path from
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package devscripts
2.12.2 is a small upload to address CVE-2012-3500. Attached is the
debdiff between 2.12.1 and 2.12.2
unblock devscripts/2.12.2
-- System Information:
De
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu xemacs21_21.4.22-4 . amd64 . -m "rebuild against Berkeley DB 5.1.x"
xemacs21's binary packages accidentally wound up depending on the
obsolete libdb4.8 package on amd64; please rebuild t
Hi!
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 12:29:50 +0200, Neil McGovern wrote:
> However, unblocked and set to age-days 30. Please note that future
> uploads will invalidate this unblock, and I'm hopeful that any future
> requests will strictly follow guidelines and introduce the absolute
> minimal changes needed
Your message dated Tue, 04 Sep 2012 08:38:19 +0200
with message-id <5045a1db.20...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#686621: unblock: devscripts/2.12.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #686621,
regarding unblock: devscripts/2.12.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
49 matches
Mail list logo
