Bug#672142: transition: allegro4.4

2012-06-13 Thread Tobias Hansen
Am 04.06.2012 01:05, schrieb Cyril Brulebois: > Tobias Hansen (04/06/2012): >> I thought removing allegro4.2 would be the next step. But now that you >> say it, that's not necessary, because liballegro4.2-dev was replaced, >> right? Also alogg and allegro-demo-data, but they're also no obstacle >>

Bug#667863: transition: octave 3.2 -> 3.6

2012-06-13 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Cyril Brulebois [2012-06-10 12:59]: > Sébastien Villemot (10/06/2012): > > All source uploads/NMUs concerning this transition have been done, and > > the octave3.2 package has been removed from unstable. > > That looks great, thanks for the follow-up. > > > The only thing left is to have tes

Re: Haskell status summary

2012-06-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 22:49:39 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > A) Upload the fixed haskell-cryptocipher to unstable, let it build on > mips, s390, s390x and sparc, remove stuff on powerpc, migrate. > > B) Remove stuff on mips, powerpc, s390, s390x and sparc, migrate. > How much 'stuff' are we

Re: haskell transition: Remove, Transition, Upload Fix or Upload Fix, Wait, Transition?

2012-06-13 Thread Jerome Vouillon
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 01:16:11PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > IOW, remove the following list? > > haskell-cryptocipher > haskell-clientsession > haskell-cprng-aes > haskell-tls > haskell-tls-extra > haskell-authenticate > haskell-hledger-web > haskell-http-enumerator > haskell-yesod-core

Bug#667863: transition: octave 3.2 -> 3.6

2012-06-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:44:28 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > I am not familiar with how ftpmaster works, but according to the Wiki [1], > the octave3.2 package will be removed automatically from testing, once > pfstools_1.8.5-0.1 (5 days from now) and debian-edu_1.700 (3 days from > now) wi

Re: Haskell status summary

2012-06-13 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 13.06.2012, 09:57 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 22:49:39 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > A) Upload the fixed haskell-cryptocipher to unstable, let it build on > > mips, s390, s390x and sparc, remove stuff on powerpc, migrate. > > > > B) Remove

Re: haskell transition: Remove, Transition, Upload Fix or Upload Fix, Wait, Transition?

2012-06-13 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
Thanks for this work, Jerome! On 06/13/2012 09:57 AM, Jerome Vouillon wrote: > On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 01:16:11PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: >> IOW, remove the following list? >> >> haskell-cryptocipher haskell-clientsession haskell-cprng-aes >> haskell-tls haskell-tls-extra haskell-authenticate

Re: haskell transition: Remove, Transition, Upload Fix or Upload Fix, Wait, Transition?

2012-06-13 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 13.06.2012, 09:57 +0200 schrieb Jerome Vouillon: > > - haskell-diagrams is not ready > > It seems to be ready now, except on ia64, where package > libghc-diagrams-{dev,prof} depend respectively on > libghc-diagrams-{dev,prof} which are not available. I don't > understand why

Re: Handling of changelogs and bin-nmus

2012-06-13 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Guillem Jover writes: > On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 14:40:28 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Guillem Jover wrote: >> > As I mentioned in the long ref-counting thread, I strongly disagree this >> > is a correct solution, it just seems like a hack to me. Instead I >> > think we shou

Blends metapackages upload *after* freeze

2012-06-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I would like to notify you about the approach we did for the last releases regarding the Blends metapackages. I would like to upload these *after* the freeze. The rationale is that the code that generates the current status of the packages in testing and this is not yet fixed before the free

Re: Migration path for 'Multi-Arch:allowed' packages

2012-06-13 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Andreas Barth writes: > * David Kalnischkies (kalnischk...@gmail.com) [120612 18:03]: >> You need to upgrade to support MultiArch, >> but you need MultiArch to upgrade… >> (beside, how would the detection for such a message look like?) > > We had discussed to export foreign-arch packages to the

Outstanding release of nagios-plugins 1.4.16

2012-06-13 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear release team, the Debian Nagios Maintainers Group is waiting for the release of nagios-plugins 1.4.16, which has several enhances and fixes[1], for example a updated Gnulib, Nagios::Plugin and a couple of IPv6 related fixes. We thought the releas

Processed: [b-d][abel] rmysql (sid)

2012-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 671115 by 677328 Bug #671115 [release.debian.org] transition: mysql-5.5 671115 was blocked by: 674328 675836 676595 650059 673528 667428 673263 650058 674122 660686 649955 651110 674309 672714 650060 672619 666331 672950 672716 673264 6771

Re: Outstanding release of nagios-plugins 1.4.16

2012-06-13 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hello Jan, Jan Wagner (13/06/2012): > As we are close before the freeze for wheezy, we would suggest to > build a package on 1.4.16pre1[2] and upload it to unstable. uploading now is a good idea. > When the release of 1.4.16 is ready, we could update to it with a > small diff against upstream.

Processed: block

2012-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 671115 by 676817 Bug #671115 [release.debian.org] transition: mysql-5.5 671115 was blocked by: 674328 675836 676595 673528 650059 667428 673263 650058 660686 674122 649955 651110 674309 672714 650060 672950 666331 672619 673264 672716 6771

Re: haskell transition: Remove, Transition, Upload Fix or Upload Fix, Wait, Transition?

2012-06-13 Thread Jerome Vouillon
Hi Joachim, On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:30:30AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Except that I’m not sure what is the issue with: > > > libghc6-regex-tdfa-prof > > libghc6-unixutils-prof > > libghc6-regex-tdfa-utf8-prof > > libghc6-unixutils-dev > > libghc6-regex-tdfa-dev > > libghc6-r

Re: Outstanding release of nagios-plugins 1.4.16

2012-06-13 Thread Jan Wagner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi KiBi, thanks for the quick answer. On 06/13/2012 11:52 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >>> When the release of 1.4.16 is ready, we could update to it with >>> a small diff against upstream. > If the diff meets the freeze criteria. are these already de

Bug#675740: unblock: ffgtk/None

2012-06-13 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Hi, On 04.06.2012 05:34, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Rolf Leggewie (03/06/2012): >> Please grant a freeze exception or better yet, sponsor it ;-) >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/602723 (ITP) >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/ffgtk/ffgtk_0.8.1-1.dsc >> >> http://qa.debian.org/developer.p

Re: haskell transition: Remove, Transition, Upload Fix or Upload Fix, Wait, Transition?

2012-06-13 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 13.06.2012, 10:44 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy: > Joachim, how this sounds to you? for details see the reply to Jerome; but all in all: ACK Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: n

Re: Please consider stopping uploads with *uncoordinated* changes to debconf templates before the release

2012-06-13 Thread Axel Beckert
Dear Christian, Christian PERRIER wrote: > I would hereby kindly ask to consider [...] I am considering to ask > our release team to *block* transitions for such packages with > uncoordinated debconf changes, on a case by case basis. JFTR: Menacing is _neither_ "kindly asking" nor does it leave a

Re: haskell transition: Remove, Transition, Upload Fix or Upload Fix, Wait, Transition?

2012-06-13 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 13/06/2012 18:13, Joachim Breitner wrote: Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 13.06.2012, 10:44 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy: Joachim, how this sounds to you? for details see the reply to Jerome; but all in all: ACK ok, thanks. I've enabled my hint (with a minor update) and it should be processed during

Bug#675740: unblock: ffgtk/None

2012-06-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 13.06.2012 15:50, Rolf Leggewie wrote: On 04.06.2012 05:34, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Rolf Leggewie (03/06/2012): unblock ffgtk/None This makes little sense. There's nothing blocked yet I guess it would be helpful if you guys made up your mind on whether you do or don't want to be contacte

Bug#675740: unblock: ffgtk/None

2012-06-13 Thread Rodrigo Gesswein
Ttyþ -Original Message- From: Rolf Leggewie Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:50:12 To: Cyril Brulebois Reply-To: Rolf Leggewie , 675...@bugs.debian.org Cc: <675...@bugs.debian.org> Subject: Bug#675740: unblock: ffgtk/None Hi, On 04.06.2012 05:34, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Rolf Leggewie (03/06

Re: state of libjpeg transition

2012-06-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 18:19:20 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Dear release team, > > I have NMUed most of the remaining packages that build-depended on > libjpeg62-dev. > > I think the only remaining packages are: > compiz-fusion-plugins-main > kphotoalbum > AFAICT there's also - netgen

Processed: retitle 658829 to transition: db-defaults 5.3, tagging 658829

2012-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 658829 transition: db-defaults 5.3 Bug #658829 [release.debian.org] transition: db-defaults Changed Bug title to 'transition: db-defaults 5.3' from 'transition: db-defaults' > tags 658829 + wheezy-ignore Bug #658829 [release.debian.org] t

Processed: block 672820 with 676100

2012-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 672820 with 676100 Bug #672820 [release.debian.org] transition: libcdio 672820 was not blocked by any bugs. 672820 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 672820: 676100 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

Bug#672820: transition: libcdio

2012-06-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 23:45:52 +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote: > Please tell me whether/when I can upload to unstable. > Thanks for your patience. It should be fine to go ahead now. #676100 will need to be fixed, but that may just mean dropping the libxmmsclient-ruby* packages. Cheers, Julien

Re: state of libjpeg transition

2012-06-13 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 08:50:54PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 18:19:20 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > Dear release team, > > > > I have NMUed most of the remaining packages that build-depended on > > libjpeg62-dev. > > > > I think the only remaining packages are:

Re: [Dolfin] Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

2012-06-13 Thread Anders Logg
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 09:33:36AM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Mon, Jun  4, 2012 at 08:43:54 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > >> > Johannes Ring (31/05/2012): > >> >> pytho

Re: state of libjpeg transition

2012-06-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 21:27:41 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > - netgen > > The version of netgen in testing does not build-depends on libjpeg62-dev. > Ah. #644069. Which the maintainer managed to reintroduce by not acknowledging my NMU. Brilliant. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Re: [Dolfin] Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

2012-06-13 Thread Johannes Ring
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Anders Logg wrote: > Does this break because we check the SWIG version in the JIT compiler, > or because it actually breaks (with some link error)? It is the version check that makes it break. This is the error message: OSError: PyDOLFIN was not compiled with t

Re: rstatd: does not work with kernel 3.0/3.1 or any other 3.x kernel (s-p-u possible?)

2012-06-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 07:57 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 09:46:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 22:12 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 21:25:37 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > > Attached is the new debdif

Re: [Dolfin] Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

2012-06-13 Thread Anders Logg
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:53:48PM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Anders Logg wrote: > > Does this break because we check the SWIG version in the JIT compiler, > > or because it actually breaks (with some link error)? > > It is the version check that makes it break.

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2012-06-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: rstatd_4.0.1-4+squeeze1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sevp7-0006w3...@franck.debian.org

Re: state of libjpeg transition

2012-06-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > - libicns I will be updating this today and #643316 is already fixed in SVN. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Re: Bits from the Ruby team: switching to Ruby 1.9 and trasition to new policy

2012-06-13 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Adam D. Barratt dijo [Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 08:06:41PM +0100]: > > (3) most of the packages that need fixing are leaf packages, or packages > > for which the Ruby bindings can be easily disabled > > That's one way of getting rid of the bugs, yes. :-) > (...) Given you say this with a smiley -

Re: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#676686: libxslt1.1: libxslt1.1 binNMU broke multi-arch installability

2012-06-13 Thread Aron Xu
Hi, The problem here is that `xml2-config --libs`'s output isn't identical across different architectures, especially differ from Linux to other platforms. On Linux, normally only "-lxml2" will be the output, but "-L{libdir} -lxml2" on others. I'm thinking about fixing libxml2 now, and will upload

Bug#675968: marked as done (transition: biosig4c++)

2012-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Jun 2012 06:09:57 +0100 with message-id <1339650597.10704.11.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#675968: transition: biosig4c++ has caused the Debian Bug report #675968, regarding transition: biosig4c++ to be marked as done. This means that you