Processed (with 1 errors): Reassign 673544 to swig2.0 and close

2012-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 673544 swig2.0 2.0.5-1 Bug #673544 {Done: Torsten Landschoff } [src:openturns] openturns: FTBFS on s390: 'ptrdiff_t& {aka int&}' vs. 'long int' Bug reassigned from package 'src:openturns' to 'swig2.0'. No longer marked as found in versio

Bug#674634: transition: celt

2012-05-26 Thread Ron
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, We'd like to remove the celt package from the distro for the Wheezy release. CELT was an experimental codec from Xiph, and that work has now been merged into the Opus codec which is

Re: Bug#620322: libvncserver package split

2012-05-26 Thread Luca Falavigna
2012/5/25 Julien Cristau : > Probably 2. OK, I'll prepare the changes and do some tests to verify everything is fine. Once I'm confident, I'll get in touch again to see whether I'm still in time to target Wheezy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Processed: unblock 645105 with 672152

2012-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unblock 645105 with 672152 Bug #645105 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal 645105 was blocked by: 673165 672152 648628 673594 673567 631019 669468 645105 was blocking: 674541 Removed blocking bug(s) of 645105: 672152 > thanks Stopping processing

Re: Please retry hugin 2011.4.0+dfsg-2 on s390

2012-05-26 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2012-05-25 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Andreas Metzler (25/05/2012): > > please retry hugin 2011.4.0+dfsg-2 (experimental) on s390. - It > > previously FTBFS due to swig issues which might now be fixed. This > > would alllow me to fix #671998 (FTBFS due to gcc4.7 in sid/testing). > Yeah, that sh

Re: Comments regarding automake1.12_1.12-1_amd64.changes

2012-05-26 Thread Luca Falavigna
2012/5/23 Eric Dorland : > I'll still be able to upload new versions of automake 1.11 if this > upload is rejected right? Yes, a rejected upload won't interfere at all with other packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Re: Haskell Plans for wheezy

2012-05-26 Thread Joachim Breitner
Dear Release-Team, here is a little follow up on the haskell-pre-freeze-work. Am Sonntag, den 13.05.2012, 22:45 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > A new version of the Haskell Platform (2012.4.0.0) is coming up in the > next few days, the first to include the latest version of the compiler, > 7.4.

Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#668806: Bug#668806: Bits from the Release Team: Freeze approaching!

2012-05-26 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On lun., 2012-05-14 at 23:13 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On lun., 2012-05-14 at 20:45 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Hello Yves-Alexis, > > > > Yves-Alexis Perez (14/05/2012): > > > This is just a friendly ping about #668806. I think it's safe to say > > > that we won't squeeze Xfce 4.10

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > sorry, thinko. I did mean End of May. > So we're at the end of May. Can we have that revert now, or do I need to NMU? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-26 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > sorry, thinko. I did mean End of May. > > > So we're at the end of May. Can we have that revert now, or do I need > to NMU? Stop nagging about the default gcc compiler

Processed: forcibly merging 673264 661422

2012-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 673264 661422 Bug #673264 [myodbc] myodbc: FTBFS in sid: mysql_real_query... no Bug #661422 [myodbc] myodbc: New release 5.1.10 available Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' 671115 was blocked by: 674328 672765 673528 673260 6731

Processed: reassign 673264 to src:myodbc, forcibly merging 673264 674309

2012-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 673264 src:myodbc Bug #673264 [myodbc] myodbc: FTBFS in sid: mysql_real_query... no Bug #661422 [myodbc] myodbc: New release 5.1.10 available Bug reassigned from package 'myodbc' to 'src:myodbc'. Bug reassigned from package 'myodbc' to 's

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Svante Signell writes: > On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: >> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> sorry, thinko. I did mean End of May. >> So we're at the end of May. Can we have that revert now, or do I need >> to NMU? > Stop nagging about

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-26 Thread Philipp Kern
Svante, am Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:58:10PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > sorry, thinko. I did mean End of May. > > So we're at the end of May. Can we have that

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-26 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 23:51 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > Svante, > > am Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:58:10PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > > On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > sorry, thinko. I did

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-26 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On dim., 2012-05-27 at 00:52 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 23:51 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > Svante, > > > > am Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:58:10PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > > > On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > > On Sun, May 13, 2012