Bug#650618: release.debian.org: Please bump urgency of mediawiki

Package: release.debian.org Severity: important Hi, I uploaded a security fix for Mediawiki last night (1:1.15.5-4) and forgot to set the urgency. Please bump it to high at your convenience. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer

Bug#650601: transition: libpng 1.5

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 09:16:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: Libpng maintainers want to update libpng from 1.2 to 1.5. libpng of ABI and API has been changed by change of 1.2 to 1.5, so it needs a transition from libopng12 to libpng15. We tested building of the package depending on libpng12. FTBFS

lusca - should it be in Debian?

Hi Luigi, I'm working through the list of build failures for armhf while we bring up the new architecture, and I've just got to lusca. I'm concerned about the status of this package: * it's an svn snapshot of a fork of squid * it's been uploaded once into Debian * there are 2 serious bugs open

dradio: should it be in Debian?

Hi Alejandro, I'm working through the list of build failures for armhf while we bring up the new architecture, and I've just got to dradio. I'm concerned about the status of this package: * it was last uploaded into Debian 2 years ago * there is a serious bug open against it for over 3 months w

slcurl: should it be in Debian?

Hi, I'm working through the list of build failures for armhf while we bring up the new architecture, and I've just got to slcurl. I'm concerned about the status of this package: * the last maintainer upload into Debian was over 2 years ago * there is a serious bug open against it for over 2 mon

slpvm: should it be in Debian?

Hi, I'm working through the list of build failures for armhf while we bring up the new architecture, and I've just got to slpvm. I'm concerned about the status of this package: * the last maintainer upload into Debian was over 2 years ago * there is a serious bug open against it for over 2 mont

Processed: block 631018 with 622278 650670

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 631018 with 622278 650670 Bug #631018 [release.debian.org] [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition Was blocked by: 648010 632763 648039 632765 647996 648018 648032 632764 648031 648023 647994 648015 647992 648035 648008 632762 Added blocking bug(s) o

slgsl: should it be in Debian?

Hi, I'm working through the list of build failures for armhf while we bring up the new architecture, and I've just got to slgsl. I'm concerned about the status of this package: * the last maintainer upload into Debian was over 2 years ago * there is a serious bug open against it for over 2 mont

Bug#648628: transition: gpsd

block 645105 by 648628 tags 648628 + pending thanks On 2011-11-13 17:04, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi Release Team, > > gpsd's service library libgps got a bunch of API and ABI c

Processed: Re: Bug#648628: transition: gpsd

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 645105 by 648628 Bug #645105 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal Was blocked by: 631019 Added blocking bug(s) of 645105: 648628 > tags 648628 + pending Bug #648628 [release.debian.org] transition: gpsd Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stoppi

Open-FCoE for Wheezy

Hello Release Team, Please provide me some Release readiness assistance for Open-FCoE's inclusion for Wheezy/Sid Open-FCoE [1], is a newer SAN technology to carry Fiber Channel traffic over Ethernet. The ethernet is generalized in the definition but in reality, a newer 10 GiB DCB Ethernet card is

Re: Updating gosa package in squeeze

On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 10:14 +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote: > I got a bug (1) for the GOsa package, that prevents GOsa from removing a host > from the DHCP configuration if it gets removed. Is it possible to get the > attached patch for 2.6.11-4 into a future stable update release? [...] > (1) http

Bug#650153: marked as done (nmu: libproxy_0.3.1-4)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:06:13 + with message-id <1322769973.5000.4.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#650153: nmu: libproxy_0.3.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #650153, regarding nmu: libproxy_0.3.1-4 to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Re: Stable update of hplip for CVE-2011-2722 (#635549) ?

On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 14:58 +0100, Didier Raboud wrote: > after taking a closer look to #635549 and an IRC chat with the Security > people, I propose to upload hplip to stable with the following changelog > entry: > > hplip (3.10.6-2+squeeze0) stable; urgency=low Why "+squeeze0"? +squeeze

Bug#650677: nmu: opal, ptlib

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Due to #647340 at least two packages were statically linked to libexpat1 on some architectures: nmu opal_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1 ptlib_2.6.7-2.1 . armel i386 ia64 kfreebsd-i386 powerpc sparc . -m

Bug#650677: marked as done (nmu: opal, ptlib)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Dec 2011 20:36:52 + with message-id <1322771812.5000.8.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#650677: nmu: opal, ptlib has caused the Debian Bug report #650677, regarding nmu: opal, ptlib to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Re: Bug#645881: critical update 29 available

* Moritz Mühlenhoff: > Florian, what's the status of openjdk6 for stable/oldstable? I've released the pending update for squeeze. lenny will eventually follow, and so will the pending updates for squeeze, but judging by my past performance, it will take a while. If someone else wants to work on

Re: Linux kernel version for wheezy

Ben Hutchings schrieb: > > --=-H5TOWby5lstdx8paRFAT > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Given a freeze in June 2012, we will have a choice between these Linux > releases (with estimated dates): > > 3.2 (December 2011) > 3.3 (March 2012) > 3

NEW changes in oldproposedupdates

Processing changes file: cups_1.3.8-1+lenny10_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: cups_1.3.8-1+lenny10_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: cups_1.3.8-1+lenny10_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: cups_1.3.8-1+lenny10_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

Bug#650618: marked as done (release.debian.org: Please bump urgency of mediawiki)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Dec 2011 23:01:53 + with message-id <1322780513.5000.9.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#650618: release.debian.org: Please bump urgency of mediawiki has caused the Debian Bug report #650618, regarding release.debian.org: Please bump urgen

Bug#650694: slang2: Broken build-dependency: libpng15-dev | libpng-dev

Package: slang2 Version: 2.2.4-4 Severity: serious This change caused the buildd to enter a give-back loop because it's not satisfiable: * Build against libpng-dev | libpng15-dev for libpng15 transition. Actually you changed it to libpng15-dev | libpng-dev. buildds look at the first alternat

NEW changes in proposedupdates

Processing changes file: clearsilver_0.10.5-1+squeeze1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: clearsilver_0.10.5-1+squeeze1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: clearsilver_0.10.5-1+squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: clearsilver_0.10.5-1+squeeze1_ia64.change

Re: lusca - should it be in Debian?

Hi Steve, Lusca is a promising fork of Squid 2.x from Adrian Chadd once he left the Squid development team. I support his idea of modularization of squid 2.x and added the package to Debian hoping to get some momentum around it. Development seems to lag upstream, however, and will surely consid