Bug#646095: Usage of "private" symbol

2011-10-22 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On ven., 2011-10-21 at 23:01 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > Anyway, let's see the upstream call on that. https://bugs.launchpad.net/midori/+bug/799603/comments/16 and I'm not knowledgeable enough to remove the guard and the “else” part. One thing I can do is add a versioned build-dep for futur

Re: Multiarch support in dpkg — really in time for wheezy?

2011-10-22 Thread Guillem Jover
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 11:23:27 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Philipp Kern wrote: > > We would like to see a dpkg with multiarch support in experimental now > > and dpkg in sid in about two weeks time. Otherwise we might not be able to > > pursue this goal for wheezy. > > Gi

Re: Multiarch support in dpkg — really in time for wheezy?

2011-10-22 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi Guillem, On Sat, 22 Oct 2011, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 11:23:27 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Given this, and if Guillem hasn't responded with a review requiring > > further work on the branch by sunday, I will upload dpkg 1.16.2 to > > experimental on sunday (October 23

Bug#646095: /usr/lib/claws-mail/plugins/fancy.so: undefined symbol: webkit_web_view_get_selected_text

2011-10-22 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Hi, FYI claws-mail-fancy-plugin is also affected by this, when trying to load the plugin, I get: /usr/lib/claws-mail/plugins/fancy.so: undefined symbol: webkit_web_view_get_selected_text Cheers Laurent Bigonville -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Processed: reassign 646095 to libwebkitgtk-1.0-0

2011-10-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 646095 libwebkitgtk-1.0-0 1.6.1-2 Bug #646095 [release.debian.org] nmu: midori_0.4.1- Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'libwebkitgtk-1.0-0'. Bug #646095 [libwebkitgtk-1.0-0] nmu: midori_0.4.1- Bug Marked as found in ver

Re: [SRM] dpkg 1.15.8.12 for squeeze

2011-10-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 07:24 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:45:51 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 03:57 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > There's some (old) regressions affecting the dpkg 1.15.x series, and > > > I'd like to upload a new 1.15.8.12 rele

Wheezy BSP Marathon first BSP in Hildesheim/Ger Dec 2-4

2011-10-22 Thread Meike Reichle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, the Wheezy Bug Squashing Party (BSP) Marathon[0] will commence with a BSP in Hildesheim, Germany from December 2nd to December 4th. The party will be hosted in the office of Pengutronix e. K.[1] For further details please have a look at the B

Bug#646254: libhangul transition binnmu

2011-10-22 Thread Changwoo Ryu
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal 5 packages need binNMUs for libhangul 0.1.0 transition: nmu imhangul_2.0.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libhangul 0.1.0-1" dw imhangul_2.0.0-1 . ALL . -m "libhangul-dev (>= 0.1.0-1)" nmu i

[SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-10-22 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
As a result of #646112, it has come to my attention that I made a packaging error in the shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} packages that released with Squeeze. Incidentally, the problem also affects shorewall-lite and shorewall6-lite in Sid. I have already fixed the latest version in the git repository

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-10-22 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 04:35:49PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > I have > attached the two helpers files that would need to be included in the > update. The first file would be included in shorewall and > shorewall-lite and the second file in shorewall6 and shorewall6-lite. > I cleverly f

Processed: block 637809 with 646286

2011-10-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 637809 with 646286 Bug #637809 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.14 Was blocked by: 637602 628507 638894 628499 640347 643038 636132 640346 636762 638367 629255 636651 642146 628505 639677 628503 634531 636656 628501 634141 628500 Ad

Processed: block 637809 with 646295

2011-10-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 637809 with 646295 Bug #637809 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.14 Was blocked by: 628507 637602 638894 640347 628499 643038 646286 636132 640346 638367 636762 629255 636651 642146 628505 639677 634531 628503 636656 628501 634141 62

Processed: block 637809 with 646297

2011-10-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 637809 with 646297 Bug #637809 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.14 Was blocked by: 637602 628507 638894 628499 640347 643038 646286 646295 636132 640346 636762 638367 629255 636651 642146 628505 639677 628503 634531 636656 628501 63

Processed: block 637809 with 646299

2011-10-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 637809 with 646299 Bug #637809 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.14 Was blocked by: 646297 628507 637602 638894 640347 628499 643038 646286 640346 646295 636132 638367 636762 629255 636651 642146 628505 639677 634531 628503 636656 62