On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:20:12PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> Am 19.10.2011 16:33, schrieb Philipp Kern:
> > Or it's the removal of the package.
>
> we should remove sun-java5 from oldstable, too, if we are going to
> remove sun-java6 from (old)stable. But I do not have a stro
* Moritz Muehlenhoff:
> As for stable/oldstable: I noticed that Red Hat provided packages for
> update 29 for RHEL 4 (RHEL 5 onwards use OpenJDK):
> http://lwn.net/Articles/463919/
If anyone remembers the rationale behind the DLJ, perhaps they can
check if the current BCL matches our needs, too?
Hello everybody,
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
> We would like to see a dpkg with multiarch support in experimental now
> and dpkg in sid in about two weeks time. Otherwise we might not be able to
> pursue this goal for wheezy.
Given this, and if Guillem hasn't responded with a review
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 646095 release.debian.org
Bug #646095 [midori] midori (libwebkitgtk-1.0-0 1.61-2): symbol lookup error:
midori: undefined symbol: webkit_web_view_get_selected_text
Bug reassigned from package 'midori' to 'release.debian.org'.
Bug No long
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 630201 pending
Bug #630201 [release.debian.org] transition: liblzma 5
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
630201: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 01:17:22AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> likely partial arches: i686, ppc64, sparc64, s390x, mips64, arm/x86
> optimisations? ABI-comptible optimisations are not the same as
> ABI-incompatible. But could be treated the same way.
FWIW I disagree with s390x being a candidate for a p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 637331 transition: GNOME 3
Bug #637331 [release.debian.org] transition: nautilus
Changed Bug title to 'transition: GNOME 3' from 'transition: nautilus'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
63733
retitle 637331 transition: GNOME 3
thanks
Am 17.10.2011 19:06, schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 12.10.2011 20:38, schrieb Julien Cristau:
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:11:57 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>
>>> as next step of getting GNOME 3 into unstable, we'd like to request a
>>> slot to start the na
Hey,
This is caused by midori using a symbol that was only exported for being
used in the test runner. I can't see how a rebuild would fix it, are you
sure it did?
It was removed here: http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/88621
I can add a work-around to webkit if required, but I'd prefer to have
mi
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 01:57:42PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> This is caused by midori using a symbol that was only exported for being
> used in the test runner. I can't see how a rebuild would fix it, are you
> sure it did?
This means that you just introduced an ABI break and are oblig
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 18:09 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 01:57:42PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > This is caused by midori using a symbol that was only exported for being
> > used in the test runner. I can't see how a rebuild would fix it, are you
> > sure it did?
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 09:04 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 07:49:50AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:17:48 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > >Due to change in one of the Brazilian timezone last week-end, I have
> > >uploaded version 2011l-0squeeze1 o
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
there were a couple of CVEs for X recently, that Moritz suggested we
fixed through p-u. And an input fix to use 64bit arithmetic to avoid
overflows with high resolution devices, that's been
Hi there,
we — the s390x porters — deem the s390x port[0] on debian-ports ready for
inclusion into the archive and hereby request this. Please tell us how
to get forward with this.
> Are machines available to general public? Does it have any users? If an
> embedded system are there real systems
[please keep sending mail to the bug, not the list directly.]
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 16:59:28 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Since python-gnomeapplet has been dropped, we should possibly update the
> transition tracker to also track those packages.
>
Not really sure that belongs in the tracker (
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 14:22:00 -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 18:09 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 01:57:42PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > > This is caused by midori using a symbol that was only exported for being
> > > used in the
On ven., 2011-10-21 at 22:17 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> At the very least the new webkit will need to declare Breaks on midori
> (<< 0.4.1-2) or something like that. And midori needs to get fixed up,
> by the sound of it.
midori has a guard for this, see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/midori/+b
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 22:24:18 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On ven., 2011-10-21 at 22:17 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > At the very least the new webkit will need to declare Breaks on midori
> > (<< 0.4.1-2) or something like that. And midori needs to get fixed up,
> > by the sound of it
On ven., 2011-10-21 at 22:38 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> That code should be killed, not
> #if !WEBKIT_CHECK_VERSION (1, 4, 3)
I've asked on upstream bug about that, but I'm not sure it's that
trivial nor really important. That code has been present and working in
multiple midori versions alre
19 matches
Mail list logo
