hint for lxc required

2011-10-13 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hi, please add a hint for lxc 0.7.5-3. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-releas

Re: hint for lxc required

2011-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:59:43 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: please add a hint for lxc 0.7.5-3. It doesn't need a hint, it needs the FTBFS fixing - see https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lxc Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: hint for lxc required

2011-10-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:59:43 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Hi, > > please add a hint for lxc 0.7.5-3. > No, it doesn't need a hint, it needs to not be out of date on some architectures. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: hint for lxc required

2011-10-13 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 10/13/2011 12:09 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > It doesn't need a hint, it needs the FTBFS fixing - see > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lxc i already requested the removal of those archs some time ago, see #640351. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Be

Re: hint for lxc required

2011-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:21:56 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: On 10/13/2011 12:09 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: It doesn't need a hint, it needs the FTBFS fixing - see https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lxc i already requested the removal of those archs some time ago, see #640351. Inde

Processed: block 635515 with 644592 644649

2011-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 635515 with 644592 644649 Bug #635515 [release.debian.org] transition: hunspell Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 635515: 644592 and 644649 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Processed: tagging 635515

2011-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 635515 + pending Bug #635515 [release.debian.org] transition: hunspell Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 635515: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635515 Deb

Processed: tagging 637331

2011-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 637331 + pending Bug #637331 [release.debian.org] transition: nautilus Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637331: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637331 Deb

Re: ifupdown-extra upload to stable-proposed-updates

2011-10-13 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 03:16:52PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Unfortunately, after some more detailed review of the diff and some > testing, I'm afraid we've had to reject the upload, as it stands. > > The issue is the move of the conffile simply using "mv". This leads to > dpkg raising a co

Bug#637331: transition: nautilus

2011-10-13 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 12.10.2011 20:38, schrieb Julien Cristau: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:11:57 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> as next step of getting GNOME 3 into unstable, we'd like to request a >> slot to start the nautilus 3 transition > > Should be ok to go ahead with this now, I think. Let the fun begin