Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.42lenny10_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.37lenny10_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6_1.32lenny10_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-kernel-di-al
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 07:06:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 23:52 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On my side can only confirm that upgrading from 2011d to 2011h indeed
> > changes the Egyptian timezone. So maybe we can simply push it to
> > proposed-updates.
>
> Assu
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 11:45 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 07:06:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 23:52 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On my side can only confirm that upgrading from 2011d to 2011h indeed
> > > changes the Egyptian timezone. S
[Apologies for the delay in getting back to you on this]
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 14:50 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> I've decided that it's too risky to disable t1lib in lenny as the
> version of freetype there has some known issues.
What's the feasibility of fixing the issues in freetype?
> At
retitle 642579 opu: package openssl/0.9.8g-15+lenny13
clone 642579 -1
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag -1 -opu
usertag -1 +pu
retitle -1 pu: package openssl/0.9.8o-4squeeze3
tag -1 + squeeze
tag 642579 + lenny
thanks
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 23:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> I
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 01:51 +1200, Olly Betts wrote:
> I've discussed these with the security team, and they decided it was most
> appropriate to handle them via a stable update. I've attached a debdiff
> showing the changes I'm proposing.
Apologies for the slight delay in getting back to you. F
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 642579 opu: package openssl/0.9.8g-15+lenny13
Bug #642579 [release.debian.org] opu: package openssl/0.9.8g-15+lenny12
Changed Bug title to 'opu: package openssl/0.9.8g-15+lenny13' from 'opu:
package openssl/0.9.8g-15+lenny12'
> clone 6425
On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 18:30 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 13:54 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > > Now that the upload has been made, it'll get reviewed in due course
> > > but, at least personally, not until it's been in unstable for a while
> > > longer, built on all archi
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:55:17PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 11:45 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 07:06:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 23:52 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > On my side can only confirm that up
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 10:58:24 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> In the interest of moving forward with the libjpeg8 migration,
> I suggest to binNMU packages that build-depends on libjpeg-dev but still
> depends
> on libjpeg62.
>
> Please find the list below assuming my c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 629477 with 618205
Bug #629477 [release.debian.org] transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, libobjc
Was blocked by: 642162 618184
Added blocking bug(s) of 629477: 618205
> block 629477 with 629202
Bug #629477 [release.debian.org] transition:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 629206 serious
Bug #629206 [src:lynkeos.app] lynkeos.app: FTBFS with gnustep-base/1.22:
LynkeosCommon.h:33:14: error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> block 629477 with 629206
[ftp-master - please could you confirm the below?]
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 20:20 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> One question for ftp-master, just to make sure I'm reading the
> auto-byhand (ick) script correctly...
>
> As far as I can see, once the package is accepted from p-u-NEW the
> auto-byha
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> To be able to evalutate this requestn Stable Release Managers will need
> to see
> a complete debdiff (based on what stable currently provides). Concerning
> backports, you are free to upload at any time (provided your upload meets
> backport
On Saturday 24 September 2011 07:23:32 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> retitle 642579 opu: package openssl/0.9.8g-15+lenny13
Right, I screwed up the title; sigh.
> On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 23:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > I don't have the final debdiff as of this time, but the
> > only change is up
tag 641031 + pending
thanks
On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 20:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 17:47 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > I'd like to update sbcl in squeeze to fix #640951 (one of the
> > modules was referencing the old name of a function). The proposed fix
> > has be
tag 642579 + pending
thanks
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 13:31 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Saturday 24 September 2011 07:23:32 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 23:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > Will send the debdiff tomorrow morning on my TZ, but I wanted to give a
> > >
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 642579 + pending
Bug #642579 [release.debian.org] opu: package openssl/0.9.8g-15+lenny13
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
642579: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 641031 + pending
Bug #641031 [release.debian.org] pu: package sbcl/1:1.0.40.0-3
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
641031: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=64
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [Apologies for the delay in getting back to you on this]
>
> On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 14:50 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > I've decided that it's too risky to disable t1lib in lenny as the
> > version of freetype there has some known issues.
>
> What's the feasibility o
Hi Adam, everyone,
On Saturday 24 September 2011 16:27:17 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 13:31 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > After two power failures and lots of connectivity issues, I think lenny13
> > should be on your hands now. Attached is the debdiff just for the sake of
Processing changes file: sbcl_1.0.40.0-3_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1r7dw3-0001vm...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: openssl_0.9.8g-15+lenny13_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1r7dw5-0001vf...@franck.debian.org
23 matches
Mail list logo
