2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt :
>> * Fix net802.11 stack kernel memory disclosure (CVE-2011-2480).
>> (Closes: #631160)
>> - 000_net80211_disclosure.diff
>
> This looks okay, although I think you meant #631161.
Yes, indeed #631161.
> Your last message
> in the log there says "uploaded to un
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 637809 with 640346
Bug #637809 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.14
Was blocked by: 628507 637602 631045 638894 628499 636132 638367 636762 629255
636651 628505 639677 628503 634531 636656 634397 628501 634141 628500
Added blocking bu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 637809 with 640347
Bug #637809 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.14
Was blocked by: 631045 637602 628507 638894 628499 640346 636132 638367 636762
629255 636651 628505 639677 628503 634531 636656 634397 628501 634141 628500
Added bloc
2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt :
> How much testing have the proposed patches had on Squeeze systems?
kfreebsd-9_ada_devices.patch and zfs_packed_la_array.patch have been
tested for over a month (both in unstable/wheezy and my squeeze
desktop with ZFS).
raid_number_uniqueness.patch and xen_disk_names.
2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt :
> On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 14:51 +, Robert Millan wrote:
>> * Move libsbuf.so.0 to /lib (needed by /sbin/zfs and /sbin/zpool).
>> (Closes: #637100)
>> * Move libipx.so.2 to /lib (needed by ifconfig).
>
> Have the portions of this change which affect the udebs be
On 09/17/2011 07:48 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 09:34 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
I fixed an important functionality bug in Gajim that makes it use 100%
CPU when connecting (#634880) [0]. I added a patch (attached) that is
already in newer versions of Gajim for months [1]
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 08:26:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Any chance of debdiffs for stable and oldstable so we can look at
> possibly getting this resolved in the next point release? (For which
> the NEW queue will be frozen during the weekend of October 1st).
For stable it would be
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:42:57PM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> I would like to upload a new release of nss-pam-ldapd for squeeze that
> fixes a few annoying bugs. These are all one or two-line changes that
> have been available in the development series for some time now.
thanks, please go
Robert,
am Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 03:45:12PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> 2011/8/8 Philipp Kern :
> > I presume that it would still unshare the volume prior to umount?
> >
> > Your change seems to contradict the OpenSolaris ZFS documentation[1]. It
> > postulates that automatic mount mana
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 641020 + confirmed
Bug #641020 [release.debian.org] pu: package nss-pam-ldapd/0.7.14
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
641020: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 637020 + confirmed
Bug #637020 [release.debian.org] pu: package zfsutils/8.1-5
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
637020: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 16:57 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 08:26:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > Any chance of debdiffs for stable and oldstable so we can look at
> > possibly getting this resolved in the next point release? (For which
> > the NEW queue will be froz
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 13:29 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> On 09/17/2011 07:48 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 09:34 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> >> I fixed an important functionality bug in Gajim that makes it use 100%
> >> CPU when connecting (#634880) [0]. I added a pa
tag 637114 + confirmed
thanks
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 12:55 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt :
> > How much testing have the proposed patches had on Squeeze systems?
>
> kfreebsd-9_ada_devices.patch and zfs_packed_la_array.patch have been
> tested for over a month (both in un
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 637114 + confirmed
Bug #637114 [release.debian.org] pu: package grub2/1.98+20100804-15
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
637114: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 22:21 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> I wonder would an upload to s-p-u be ok to fix a regression in cython
> package, which is apparently of importance for some users (who even
> triaged repository to the specific commit resolving the issue). Patch
> (see commit below)
tag 637840 + confirmed
thanks
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 13:55 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 19:33 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> >> - fast-import: accept no-op "feature notes" command for frontends
> >>use to declare they require an importer
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 637840 + confirmed
Bug #637840 [release.debian.org] pu: package git/1:1.7.2.5-3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
637840: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
2011/9/18 Philipp Kern :
> please use version "8.1-4+squeeze1" and target stable. Otherwise ACK,
> please go ahead.
Uploaded, thanks.
Btw, is there any guideline on when to use X.Y+squeezeZ and then to
just increment Y? I notice that both schemes are used.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
tag 638190 + confirmed
thanks
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 19:56 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Please find attached the proposed debdiff without the Recommends
> addition. It takes upstream patch but with the discussed change to use
> an eval block, and a require instead of use.
Thanks.
Assuming
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 638190 + confirmed
Bug #638190 [release.debian.org] pu: package shelldap/0.2-1+squeeze1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
638190: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.
"Yann Leboulanger" wrote, Sun, 18 Sep 2011 19:32:50 +0200
> On 09/18/2011 05:47 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Please could you provide a debdiff against the current stable package
> > (i.e. "debdiff $stable.dsc $new.dsc") for a final check?
>
> Sure. It's attached
Thanks.
I'd generally prefer 0
On 09/18/2011 07:38 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
"Yann Leboulanger" wrote, Sun, 18 Sep 2011 19:32:50 +0200
On 09/18/2011 05:47 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Please could you provide a debdiff against the current stable package
(i.e. "debdiff $stable.dsc $new.dsc") for a final check?
Sure. It's at
2011/9/18 Adam D. Barratt :
> On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 12:55 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>> kfreebsd-9_ada_devices.patch and zfs_packed_la_array.patch have been
>> tested for over a month (both in unstable/wheezy and my squeeze
>> desktop with ZFS).
>>
>> raid_number_uniqueness.patch and xen_disk_name
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 640922 + squeeze
Bug #640922 [release.debian.org] pu: package eglibc/2.11.2-10 (Was: Bug#639897:
Please don't check /proc/mounts)
Added tag(s) squeeze.
> tags 641155 + squeeze
Bug #641155 [release.debian.org] pu: package mdadm/3.1.4-1+8efb9d
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 06:57:01PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 16:40 +0200, Youssef Eldakar wrote:
> > On 01/-10/-28163 09:59 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:23 +0400, Eugene Barbashin wrote:
> [Russian law changes on October 30th]
> > > For the r
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 20:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 11:03 +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:33:47PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote [edited]:
> > > On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 22:22 +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > > > update-inetd parses succe
tag 637020 + pending
thanks
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 18:51 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/9/18 Philipp Kern :
> > please use version "8.1-4+squeeze1" and target stable. Otherwise ACK,
> > please go ahead.
>
> Uploaded, thanks.
I've marked the package for acceptance at the next dinstall.
> Btw
tag 637114 + pending
thanks
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 21:20 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/9/18 Adam D. Barratt :
> > On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 12:55 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> >> kfreebsd-9_ada_devices.patch and zfs_packed_la_array.patch have been
> >> tested for over a month (both in unstable/whe
tag 641020 + pending
thanks
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 17:05 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:42:57PM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> > I would like to upload a new release of nss-pam-ldapd for squeeze that
> > fixes a few annoying bugs. These are all one or two-line changes that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 641020 + pending
Bug #641020 [release.debian.org] pu: package nss-pam-ldapd/0.7.14
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
641020: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 637020 + pending
Bug #637020 [release.debian.org] pu: package zfsutils/8.1-5
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
637020: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=63702
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 637114 + pending
Bug #637114 [release.debian.org] pu: package grub2/1.98+20100804-15
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
637114: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
I intend to upload a new version of linux-2.6 to unstable tomorrow.
This will include upstream stable update 3.0.4 and various other bug
fixes. It should not involve an ABI bump.
Let me know if there is anything this should wait for.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Power corrupts. Absolute power is kin
Hi Release Team,
I'm wondering if it's worth updating cpufrequtils in Squeeze to the
current version in testing/unstable.
There are a couple of fixes that are worth considering in there and
namely: fixing support for linux 3.0 (some modules have been moved
and broke assumptions in cpufrequtils ini
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:03:06PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote [edited]:
> The upload happened, and I've flagged the package for acceptance at the
> next dinstall.
great, thanks Adam!
--
Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing changes file: zfsutils_8.1-4+squeeze1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss-pam-ldapd_0.7.14_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: update-inetd_4.38+nmu1+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: grub2_1.98+20100804-14+squeeze1_kfreebsd-amd64
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 10:33 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:27:55 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 23:59 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >> I believe we're now ready to do the kernel update, having got most
> >> of
> >> the security fixes done separately
38 matches
Mail list logo
