Processing changes file: rails_2.1.0-7+lenny1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1r1zsu-0003l5...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: rails_2.3.5-1.2+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1r1zst-0003kp...@franck.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi!
I would like to fix #553672 which affecting upgrades from Lenny to Squeeze of
system-tools-backends. The bug, due to a conffile renaming not handled
properly, is pretty annoying. It prevents
Hi,
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:11:33 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
I would like to fix #553672 which affecting upgrades from Lenny to
Squeeze of
system-tools-backends. The bug, due to a conffile renaming not
handled
properly, is pretty annoying. It prevents users from doing any
administrative
task u
[ resending with corrected e-mail address; sorry if you get the mail
twice ]
Hi!
I just joined the pkg-nagios team and am now taking care of the nagvis
package, which is in a less than ideal state in the current release.
(I'm sorry, I NMUed the version in stable, but didn't noticed all
problems
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 08:37:35PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> We'd like to have a list of packages which are part of this transition.
Dependency level 1 (build-depends only on libgnustep-base-dev):
biococoa
gnustep-netclasses
mknfonts.tool
oolite
pantomime1.2
Dependency level 2 (build-depend
On 09/07/2011 09:30 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
we finally got target dates for the next point releases of both Lenny
and Squeeze. Lenny should get 5.0.9 on October 1st; Squeeze will follow
on October 8th with 6.0.3.
again, you forgot debian-live@l.d.o.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbu
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 12:26:56PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 09/07/2011 09:30 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> >we finally got target dates for the next point releases of both Lenny
> >and Squeeze. Lenny should get 5.0.9 on October 1st; Squeeze will follow
> >on October 8th with 6.0.3.
> again, y
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:48:57AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 08:37:35PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > We'd like to have a list of packages which are part of this transition.
[…]
> libgnustep-base1.20 vs libgnustep-base1.22
> libgnustep-gui0.18 vs libgnustep-gui0.20
O
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> (And maybe that should just be a c'n'p-able list.)
Done.
PS: I was the one who added the distrowatch/freshmeat/identica stuff
on the checklist, I hope that makes sense and that the SRMs don't mind
doing it.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
> base-files can be uploaded now, as it will be held in NEW until closing
> time anyway.
Done, for both lenny and squeeze.
Thanks a lot.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
On 08/09/2011 12:45, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
>
>> (And maybe that should just be a c'n'p-able list.)
>
> Done.
>
> PS: I was the one who added the distrowatch/freshmeat/identica stuff
> on the checklist, I hope that makes sense and that the SRMs do
severity 620037 important
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201109081423.08339.hol...@layer-acht.org
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Given that we already notify Press Team (and that they have access to the
> identica account), maybe it makes sense to just remove that item?
True, especially since the Debian identica account seems to be
auto-dent debian.org/News RSS feed ite
Dear SRM,
would you consider the attached patches for a squeeze point release for eglibc?
The reason behind this request is: on systems with a lot of mounts,
statvfs64() libc function takes a huge amount of times since it needs
to parse /proc/mounts. With the proposed patches, and with a kernel
fr
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Severity: normal
Dear SRM,
would you consider the attached patches for a squeeze point release for eglibc?
The reason behind this request is: on systems with a lot of mounts,
statvfs64() libc function takes a hu
block 628529 with 630517
kthxbye
On 05/29/2011 10:19 PM, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>I'd like to schedule a transition for ICU from 4.4 to 4.8. In the past
>several ICU transitions, it has been sufficient to do a binary NMU for
>each reverse dependency, and there's little reason to believe that this
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 628529 with 630517
Bug #628529 [release.debian.org] transition: ICU transition (4.4 -> 4.8)
Was blocked by: 628304 631031 625415 556768 634404 625377 624962 556756 628584
554407
Added blocking bug(s) of 628529: 630517
> kthxbye
Stopping pro
Processing changes file: bcfg2_0.9.5.7-1.1+lenny1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1r1qj5-0006o8...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: bcfg2_1.0.1-3+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1r1qj3-0006np...@franck.debian.org
20 matches
Mail list logo
