Le dimanche 19 juin 2011 à 20:09 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
> Please report your transition as a transition bugreport, next time.
OK, Sorry about that.
> On 02/27/2011 09:15 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> >
> > Just to let you know that we are planning to upload a new upstream
> > release of the
Hi!
* Adam D. Barratt [2011-06-09 13:50:41 CEST]:
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:58:02 +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
>>> Ping? :)
>>
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/dput.git;a=commitdiff;h=7453fa87858049595d4413abab458a76204942e0
>>
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=coll
On Saturday, June 18, 2011 10:04:33 PM Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>Hi!
Hi,
> * George Danchev [2011-06-18 14:45:43 CEST]:
> > [libburnia story]
>
> I can't speak for the stable release team, but I guess they won't
> approve the changes you have outlined here. They sound pretty intrusive
> and l
Hi againn.
* Gerfried Fuchs [2011-06-20 12:55:26 CEST]:
> I took the liberty to cherry-pick the first patch, and for the second,
> I did simply duplicate the entry and gave it the proper name. This is
> the debdiff:
Given that I was told that it's actually my own fault that this hasn't
got f
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi all,
As a user curious about transition I find it hard to find information
about why a particular transition happens.
http://release.debian.org/transitions/ . While
release.debian.org/transitions jus
Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
Hi,
> How much time would you need to get your new version in releasable
> shape? I wanted to get libevent in sid as fast as possible because of
> another of my packages, but it can wait a bit if it helps.
Thankfully, it is in a releasable shape :) I have a few test
On 20/06/2011 17:26, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> How much time would you need to get your new version in releasable
>> shape? I wanted to get libevent in sid as fast as possible because of
>> another of my packages, but it can wait a bit if it helps.
>
> Tha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 631019 + moreinfo
Bug #631019 [release.debian.org] HDF5 Transition
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
631019: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631019
Debian
Hi,
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 14:34 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Hi againn.
>
> * Gerfried Fuchs [2011-06-20 12:55:26 CEST]:
> > I took the liberty to cherry-pick the first patch, and for the second,
> > I did simply duplicate the entry and gave it the proper name. This is
> > the debdiff:
>
>
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 00:16 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 09:51:30PM +0200, Sergio Gelato wrote:
> > It is true that you can enable the enctypes for all principals by adding
> > [libdefaults]
> > allow_weak_crypto = true
> > to /etc/heimdal-kdc/kdc.conf, but that's a very
Processing changes file: perl_5.10.1-17squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: perl_5.10.1-17squeeze1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: perl_5.10.1-17squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: perl_5.10.1-17squeeze1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing change
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 85 + patch
Bug #85 [src:mailutils] FTBFS with binutils-gold
Added tag(s) patch.
> severity 85 normal
Bug #85 [src:mailutils] FTBFS with binutils-gold
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> unblock 622279 with 85
Bug #6
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 07:18:09PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> Hi,
> netinstall of MIPS IP22 is currently broken (#630424). This is due to
> two bugs in tip22: a wrong load address an
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # not in testing: psyco, petsc4py
> unblock 622279 with 614619 626858
Bug #622279 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults (switching
default: 2.6 -> 2.7)
Was blocked by: 628860 621829 629085 628243 625676 623587 622966 623578 629087
625
On 21 June 2011 05:29, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> The patch itself is indeed fairly small, but the changes to the package
> which was uploaded to p-u-NEW aren't quite so tiny. Specifically, the
> diff includes this auto-patch:
>
> patches/debian-changes-1.4.0~git20100726.dfsg.1-2 | 2171
> +++
15 matches
Mail list logo