Re: Bug#625544: marked as done (transition: imagemagick4)

Hello Medhi, Mehdi Dogguy [2011-05-31 8:20 +0200]: > why are you closing this bug? Sorry, copy&paste fail. I meant to close #625556 (and did so now). Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.

Bug#628663: nmu: patchage_0.4.4-1.2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 nmu patchage_0.4.4-1.2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new flowcanvas" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECA

Bug#628663: marked as done (nmu: patchage_0.4.4-1.2)

Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2011 10:33:30 +0200 with message-id <4de4a7da.9060...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#628663: nmu: patchage_0.4.4-1.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #628663, regarding nmu: patchage_0.4.4-1.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Re: [SRM] proposed stable update openldap

On Mon, May 30, 2011 15:10, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 13:24, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> - A grave problem when reconfiguring the package. >> >> This (#596343) seems okay, but doesn't appear to have been fixed in >> unstable yet, which is generally a pre-requisite for applying th

Re: [SRM] Stable update for gwrite

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:49:07AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: > I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached > debdiff). Sorry, but no. All this is out of scope for stable. (Also: unless there's a RC bug because of them lintian errors do not qualify.) Kind regards Philipp Kern

unblocking busybox for -testing

Hello. Can you please unblock busybox 1:1.18.4-2 upload to go from unstable to testing? It has been in unstable for a long time already, and the only problem found so far has been fixed in subsequent upload. It's a new upstream version upload, so the changes are somewhat large for such a delicat

Re: [SRM] Stable update for gwrite

On 2011年05月31日 14:03, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 31 May 2011, Aron Xu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached debdiff). > > The patch doesn't look right: > > man dh_pythonsupport > [...] >Appropriate dependencies on python-suppor

Re: [SRM] Stable update for gwrite

On 2011年05月31日 18:16, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:49:07AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: >> I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached >> debdiff). > > Sorry, but no. All this is out of scope for stable. (Also: unless > there's a RC bug because of them lintian e

Re: [SRM] Stable update for gwrite

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 08:56:15PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: > On 2011年05月31日 18:16, Philipp Kern wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:49:07AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: > >> I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached > >> debdiff). > > Sorry, but no. All this is out of scope for sta

[SRM] Update for apt-listchanges

Hi, I'd like to upload the following changes for apt-listchanges to stable: apt-listchanges (2.85.7+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low [ Sandro Tosi ] * Don't skip the very first entry when the NEWS file is added; thanks to Ryo IGARASHI for the report and to Robert Luberda for the patch; Clos

Re: unblocking busybox for -testing

On 31/05/2011 13:08, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Hello. > > Can you please unblock busybox 1:1.18.4-2 upload to go > from unstable to testing? It has been in unstable for > a long time already, and the only problem found so far > has been fixed in subsequent upload. > > It's a new upstream version

Bug#624637: marked as done (transition: libquicktime)

Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2011 17:16:58 +0200 with message-id <4de5066a.3080...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#624637: transition: libquicktime has caused the Debian Bug report #624637, regarding transition: libquicktime to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Please binNMU adplay and ocp against updated libadplug

Hello, A new version of adplug is in the archives, and adplay and ocp need a rebuild against the new shared library package (libadplug-2.2.1-0). nmu adplay_1.6-1+b1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against new adplug.' nmu ocp_1:0.1.20-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against new adplug.' Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: [SRM] Update for apt-listchanges

On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 16:03 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > I'd like to upload the following changes for apt-listchanges to stable: > > apt-listchanges (2.85.7+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low > > [ Sandro Tosi ] > * Don't skip the very first entry when the NEWS file is added; thanks to Ryo >

Re: [SRM] proposed stable update openldap

On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 11:11 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 15:10, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 13:24, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >>> - A grave problem when reconfiguring the package. > >> > >> This (#596343) seems okay, but doesn't appear to have been fixed in

Re: klibc 1.5.20 stable/oldstable update

On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 17:35 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2011, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 15:41 +, maximilian attems wrote: > > > * [klibc] ipconfig: comment new escape function > > > security fix for CVE-2011-0997 type vulnerability > > > corres

Bug#628147: Bug#598361: Make SRM aware of #598361

tag 628147 + pending thanks On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 17:43 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 18:06 +0200, Lukas Gaertner wrote: > > retitle -1 "slapcat gives unclean shutdown detected should be fixed in > > stable" > > thanks > > > > Hi, > > Please consider #598361 for the

Processed: Re: Bug#628147: Bug#598361: Make SRM aware of #598361

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 628147 + pending Bug #628147 [release.debian.org] pu: openldap_2.4.23-7+squeeze1 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 628147: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6

Re: Please binNMU adplay and ocp against updated libadplug

On 05/31/2011 05:28 PM, Артём Попов wrote: Hello, A new version of adplug is in the archives, and adplay and ocp need a rebuild against the new shared library package (libadplug-2.2.1-0). nmu adplay_1.6-1+b1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against new adplug.' Was this #553626 fixed? nmu ocp_1:0.1.20-

NEW changes in proposedupdates

Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.23-7.1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qrv16-0008te...@franck.debian.org

Processed: limit package to release.debian.org, tagging 626844, tagging 626845, tagging 627742, tagging 626003

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 626844 + pending Bug #626844 [release.debian.org] pu: package kde

NEW changes in proposedupdates

Processing changes file: apt-listchanges_2.85.7+squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: rails_2.3.5-1.2+squeeze0.1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: citadel_7.83-2squeeze2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: citadel_7.83-2squeeze2_armel.changes ACCEPT Proc

NEW changes in oldproposedupdates

Processing changes file: rails_2.1.0-7+lenny0.1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qrabb-0002pb...@franck.debian.org