Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
libgs8 in squeeze requires files from /usr/share/ghostscript/8.71 but
does not declare a corresponding dependency on ghostscript. Worse,
it could make the transition to libgs9 in wheez
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:57:37AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:04:14 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote:
>
> > Dear Gabor Kiss,
> >
> > thanks for the information, will test it myself and then release a new
> > version.
> > And thanks for your good bug report.
> >
> Can thi
Harald Jenny schrieb am Montag, den 24. Januar 2011:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:57:37AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:04:14 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Gabor Kiss,
> > >
> > > thanks for the information, will test it myself and then release a new
>
Oh my, I see now that the git branch I based my work on, even if created
by Michael Gilbert, do not match the final packaging actually released
by him :-(
I will double-check if anything but naming of patch and changelog entry
is different, and get back to you.
- Jonas
diff -Nru ghostscri
On Sat, January 22, 2011 23:36, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Jürgen A. Erhard writes:
>> This is from a hgwebdir install (dev.jaerhard.com). And it appears
>> it's "fixed" when the repo has owner www-data:www-data. The repo has
>> 644 perms throughout (+x for directories). So, it appears it
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please unblock package dnssec-tools
The 1.7-3 introduces fix to a bug which makes the signer script always
to fail (on certain condition) due
2011/1/24 Neil McGovern :
> By the looks of things, Mehdi has already replied to your bug saying
> that we can't accept the package at this stage.
Yes, I know. But I thought that it could also be a good candidate for
a "second thought" as it has been for other packages too. I mean, the
package is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
please unblock gnome-screensaver to disable a feature that doesn’t work,
and tricks people into thinking the user has seen a message while he
does not.
gnome-screensaver (2.3
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 02:58:41PM +0200, Teodor MICU wrote:
> 2011/1/3 Mehdi Dogguy :
> > On 01/03/2011 11:31 AM, Teodor wrote:
> >>
> >> Please unblock package mercurial-server. The two RC bugs for this
> >> package were fixed so it should get back for inclussion in Debian 6.0
> >> (squeeze).
> >
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 21:01:56 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi release team,
>
> I hope you will not be bored by the trouble which is caused by the
> GNUmed package but the recent security uploads contained a regression
> which had the effect that the .mo files are not installed in the package
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 18:29:56 +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There is a upstream patch for geda-gaf packaged that fixes an arbitrary
> code execution issue:
>
> http://git.gpleda.org/?p=gaf.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=16b3d32fcf8458389a491aed9437be835131b4b9
> here is the bug
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
please unblock gnome-panel for a pair of minor adjustments.
gnome-panel (2.30.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Only recommend menu-xdg.
* 10_bookmarks_limit.patch: new patch.
Hi,
these two bugs are no regressions from Lenny and should therefore be
deferred to 6.0.1, IMHO:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610984
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610985
Cheers,
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.or
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 09:27:52AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Mehdi Dogguy (me...@debian.org):
>
> > Do you intend to fix that in unstable? Did you submit a bug so that it's
> > kept under someone's radar?
> >
> > In any case, like what jcristau said… so closing this bugreport.
>
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
tag 610984 + squeeze-ignore
usertag 610984 + squeeze-can-defer
tag 610985 + squeeze-ignore
usertag 610985 + squeeze-can-defer
thanks
On Mon, January 24, 2011 17:04, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> these two bugs are no regressions from Lenny and should therefore
clone 610968 -1
reassign -1 dpkg
thanks
Hi peoples.
This upgrade (and similar ones) is kind of having issues.
After debugging it with David Kalnischkies and Julien Cristau, we found out
that apt is having quite some issues with the Breaks: konqueror in dpkg.
Basically, udev wanst a new util-l
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 10:45:58AM -0800, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> >> diffstat: 61 files changed, 1502 insertions(+), 657 deletions(-)
> >> Is all of that necessary to fix the security issues?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > However, I do not have th
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dansguardian
dansguardian fails to restart due to a bug in the init script (#605934).
Please unblock the unstable version which has a minimal fix for this.
Thanks,
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:17:06 -
with message-id
<646dd34fb0bcb4c9761874b4f5101cfd.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#610996: unblock: dansguardian/2.10.1.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #610996,
regarding unblock: dansguardian/2.10.1.1-3
to be marked a
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:43:35 +0100
with message-id <20110124184335.gp30...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#609794: unblock: xen/4.0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #609794,
regarding unblock: xen/4.0.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 06:10:02PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > I hope you will not be bored by the trouble which is caused by the
> > GNUmed package but the recent security uploads contained a regression
> > which had the effect that the .mo files are not installed in the package
> > and thus
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package geda-gaf
* Added disable_gnetlist-arg.diff patch, to fix arbitrary code execution.
(LP: #700194)
Debdiff against 1.6.1-4 is attached.
unblock geda-gaf/1.6.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
please unblock libgksu for a translation update.
libgksu (2.0.13~pre1-4) unstable; urgency=low
* ru.po: updated Russian translation by Alexander Sashanov.
Closes: #6091
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
please unblock rhythmbox to fix a crasher.
rhythmbox (0.12.8-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Drop type-handling usage. Closes: #587870.
* Bump standards version accordingly.
Faheem Mitha wrote:
>>> I think that getting the fix into a point release ie. 6.1 as a
>>> backport to 11.85 would be reasonable.
>>
>> I agree - delaying squeeze because of that would be ridiculous.
>
> Right. So, what's the next step? Wait for the auctex maintainer?
> Proceed with a unstable NM
Hi,
Apologies for the delay in getting back to you.
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 09:28 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> I've moved iceowl in squeeze from the comm-zentral 3.0.0 codebase (aka
> sunbird 1.0b1) to comm-zentral 3.0.11 (thunderbird 3.0.11). This fixes
> quiet some security related issues in the
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Frank Küster wrote:
Faheem Mitha wrote:
I think that getting the fix into a point release ie. 6.1 as a
backport to 11.85 would be reasonable.
I agree - delaying squeeze because of that would be ridiculous.
Right. So, what's the next step? Wait for the auctex maintai
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:46:52 +0100
with message-id <20110124214652.gq30...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#611005: unblock: geda-gaf/1.6.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #611005,
regarding unblock: geda-gaf/1.6.1-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 13:45 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, January 22, 2011 23:36, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > Yeah I see how adding that will fix the crash at hand.I could just
> > apply this -- does just adding tyhe **opts also fix your problem? That
> > would just make these function
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 10:59 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:59:18 +0100, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
>
> > Hi !
> >
> > I am the upstream and sponsored Debian maintainer of Bip.
> >
> > A user of bip reported a bug which can be used to do a remote DOS of
> > bip. Bug i
Hi Team,
Sorry for taking s long
On 11/01/2010 10:57 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Many apologies for letting this keep slipping down my to-do list.
>
> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 14:24 +0200, Dario Minnucci wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> On 08/25/2010 08:53 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>>
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 02:35:44PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> OK, let's do hyphen-* and mythes-* then.
I uploaded all "my" packages to experimental with it (source packages
- hyphen
- openoffice.org-dictionaries
- openthesaurus
Now got through NEW.
(No transitional packages yet, though)
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 02:32:31AM +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote:
> Heh. Well, that does sound like lots of fun. Unfortunately, as I
> wrote to Julian Gilbey, I still seem to have breakage, even with
> this patch. If I set TeX PDF mode to true, ie.
It seems that it was my TeX file which was broken. c
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock openjdk-6/1.8.4-1, minor update, including a security fix.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
[CC'ing debian-release@l.d.o]
according to RM [1], I'd like to upload gnash 0.8.8-5squeeze1 which has been
rejected [2] from t-p-u.
[...]
swfdec-gnome_0.8.8-5squeeze1_amd64.deb: old version (0.8.8-7) in unstable <= new
version (1:0.8.8-5squeeze1) t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
binutils (2.20.1-16) unstable; urgency=low
* Add arm-linux-gnueabi to the multiarch targets, remove the old
arm*-linux-gnu targets. Addresses #610745.
This is a no-change u
On 20.01.2011 08:06, tony mancill wrote:
On 01/19/2011 10:36 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* tony mancill:
On 01/14/2011 11:46 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* tony mancill:
As per Section 5.8.5 of the Developer's Reference, I'd like to get
confirmation from the Security Team that they are anticipat
> That diffstat is cerainly much larger than can be accepted at this stage
> in the release. Have you contacted the security team about these? It's
> possible to look at getting an update in after the release which fixes
> these specific issues.
I contacted the security team January 9th, no respon
Package: release.debian.org
live-manual (1:2.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Ben Armstrong ]
* Fixing missing paren in Reporting bugs chapter.
[ Carlo Stemberger ]
* Proof-reading user_examples, Italian translation.
* Conforming the style of user_example, Italian translation.
* Fixing
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package popularity-contest
It really fixes #610840 (correct pre-dependency on debconf and
cdebconf to properly handle the existence of a Serbian (Latin)
translation of debcon
40 matches
Mail list logo
