Am 20.11.2010 18:14, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 20:46:11 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>>
>> Please unblock package otrs2
>>
>> unblock otrs2/2.4.9+df
Hi Moritz,
thank you for your support. Sorry but I missed your response.
If 3.6.3 is not accepted for testing -- where these security
vulnerabilities (http://bugs.debian.org/602420) are solved upstream --
applying patches to 3.6.2 could be but in consideration. By the way,
3.6.3.0-2 solved some fu
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 592300 unblock
retitle 592300 unblock: xz-utils/5.0.0-2
thanks
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:00:00 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> 5.0.0 was released at last. Relative to xz-utils in testing, it
>> brings the following ma
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was jrnie...@gmail.com).
> usertags 592300 unblock
Bug#592300: future unblock: xz-utils/5.0.0
Usertags were: freeze-exception.
Usertags are now: un
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was jrnie...@gmail.com).
> usertags 592300 unblock
Bug#592300: unblock: xz-utils/5.0.0-2
Usertags were: unblock freeze-exception.
Usertags are now:
1:3.6.4-1 has been in unstable now, and it fixed the legal issue,
should we convert this RM request to an unblock request?
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
Release Team,
Would this be an acceptable change for a freeze exception?
On 11/19/2010 01:11 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Package: smartmontools
> Version: 5.39.1+svn3124-1
>
> 3w-sas is part of squeeze's kernel (for the 9750 cards), so it would
> be nice to have support in smartmontools as well
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package apt-cacher-ng. .
The background of this request is mainly task #598469 which originally
got RC severity by Phil and I supposed that most mirror administra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21. nov. 2010 17:32, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Petter, Ronny,
>
> On Sonntag, 21. November 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 14:39 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> please unblock sitesummary 0.0.67, which includes two trivial bug
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
I would like to ask for freeze exception for the latest wireshark upload.
It fixes a serious vulnerability and closes an important bug.
Changes:
wireshark (1.2.11-4) unstable; urgency=high
.
* security fixes from Wir
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 603396 + squeeze
Bug #603396 [release.debian.org] RM: libdc0/0.3.13-1
Added tag(s) squeeze.
> tags 604413 + squeeze
Bug #604413 [release.debian.org] RM: libcompass-ruby/0.10.2debian-2
Added tag(s) squeeze.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:35:05 +0100
with message-id <20101122163505.gk21...@patate.is-a-geek.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#604516: please unblock wireshark/1.2.11-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #604516,
regarding please unblock wireshark/1.2.11-4
to be marked as done.
This means
Hi Adam,
On 11/16/2010 11:47 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> Has anyone conducted a proper review of the code to see how many more of
>>> these issues might be lurking? Whilst I'm happy to fix such issues in
>>> stable, it would be nice not to have to keep approving changes that look
>>> remarkabl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.de
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze
I would like you to unblock the debarchiver package (version
0.9.6).
It has a mis-spelling in the control file (recomments instead
of recommends) making all the recommends totally useless.
I have uploaded a fix for that and I would like
There is a bug in ICU 4.4, for which we have a small and minimally
invasive patch, that causes OpenOffice.org rendering of Malayalam to not
work. The reporter argues that the bug makes the package unusable for
at least one set of users (those who work in Malayalam). I've attached
the latest bit o
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libx11
Here's the diffstat between current version and new one:
| $ git diff --stat libx11-2_1.3.3-3 libx11-2_1.3.3-4
| configure.ac |2
severity 604531 normal
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 604531 unblock
thanks
On 22/11/2010 18:09, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: serious
> Tags: squeeze
>
There is no "serious" unblock requests.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://do
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 604531 normal
Bug #604531 [release.debian.org] Unblock for debarchiver
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was me...@dogguy.org).
>
Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:18:43 +0100
with message-id <4ceac213.9000...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#604531: Unblock for debarchiver
has caused the Debian Bug report #604531,
regarding Unblock for debarchiver
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:24:44 +0100
with message-id <4ceac37c.3050...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#604538: unblock: libx11/2:1.3.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #604538,
regarding unblock: libx11/2:1.3.3-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Hi
This is just a quick remember to all those that would like to help the
Squeeze release. There is a bug squashing part next week-end in
Bern[1]. If you plan to attend, please sign up on the wiki page NOW!
If you have the impression that most remaining RC bugs are to hard to
fix for you, I have
Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:38:16 +0100
with message-id <4ceac6a8.9040...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#603570: Bug #603570: RM: fcitx/testing -- ROM; not
dfsg free
has caused the Debian Bug report #603570,
regarding RM: fcitx/testing -- ROM; not dfsg free
to be marked as done.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package software-center
One small fix to show icons, a heavy update of translations,
and the final deubuntufication of the help (and two translations
for the help).
Me gustaría conocerte !!!
Mi nombre es Marja
Hola, soy Marja León.
Me interesaría conocerte !!
Tengo 19 años, curso actualmente universidad.
Te invito a visitar mi página web.
www.marjaleon.net
Processing changes file: mantis_1.1.6+dfsg-2lenny4_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pkccu-0002ug...@franck.debian.org
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 17:29 +0100, sils wrote:
> On 11/16/2010 11:47 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Please go ahead.
>
> About 1.1.6+dfsg-2lenny4, it was uploaded to spu.
Thanks. p-u-new processing for the upcoming point release officially
closed last night, but as mantis is arch:all and the pat
Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:55:43 +
with message-id <1290459343.16419.443.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#604431: unblock: masqmail/0.2.27-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #604431,
regarding unblock: masqmail/0.2.27-1.1
to be marked as done.
This me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Julien,
Am 21.11.2010 12:38, schrieb Roland Gruber:
> Am 20.11.2010 21:42, schrieb Julien Cristau:
>> I'm sorry, but that's not appropriate at this stage. Targetted fixes
>> for RC or important bugs might still be accepted, but not whole new
>> up
Hello,
Bug #603897 makes speech dispatcher unable to use the flite speech
synthesis engine, because of an inappropriate patch
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=10;filename=07_flite-1.4-fix.dpatch;att=1;bug=577896
while the actual proper upstream fix is just
http://bugs.debian.org/cg
Package: release.debian.org
live-boot (2.0.12-1) unstable; urgency=medium
[ T(A)ILS developers ]
* Fixing fromiso= on Squeeze.
-- Daniel Baumann Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:27:01 +0100
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panther
Package: release.debian.org
live-build (2.0.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Daniel Baumann ]
* Enabling volatile for squeeze.
* Updating volatile urls for squeeze.
[ Richard Nelson ]
* Cleanup l-b.cgi header file to reflect Live Build.
[ Daniel Baumann ]
* Removing apt-mirror-setu
Package: release.debian.org
live-config (2.0.12-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Adding openssh-server config script to regenerate ssh keys on boot.
-- Daniel Baumann Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:00:11 +0100
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: danie
Well the real problem is a textual data file has a legal problem, and
the program itself does not have changes. My question is, is it
possible to introduce 3.6.4 to testing now?
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
ejabberd 2.1.5-3 contains a backport for the upstream fix
for the bug reported in Debian as [1] (and upstream as [2]).
This bug completely prevents the usage of one of the available
communication methods for the server, http-poll, which is typically used
to connect through restrictive proxy server
Dear Release Team, Python Maintainers,
I just received notice (bug 603579) that upgrade lenny to squeeze will
break if a boost package containing an "rtupdate" script is installed.
In stable there are four such packages:
libboost-python-dev
libboost-dbg
libboost-python1.35-dev
libboost1.
Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 06:19:06 +0100
with message-id <4ceb4eca.8000...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#604571: unblock: live-boot/2.0.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #604571,
regarding unblock: live-boot/2.0.12-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 06:18:43 +0100
with message-id <4ceb4eb3.3020...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#604572: unblock: live-build/2.0.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #604572,
regarding unblock: live-build/2.0.7-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 06:18:04 +0100
with message-id <4ceb4e8c.3000...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#604574: unblock: live-boot/2.0.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #604574,
regarding unblock: live-boot/2.0.12-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
(request sent in case the maintainer accidentally omit doing the
request themselves)
Please unblock package openldap
Translation updates.
unblock openldap/2.4.23-7
-- System Information:
Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 08:45:59 +0100
with message-id <4ceb7137.1020...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#604624: unblock: openldap/2.4.23-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #604624,
regarding unblock: openldap/2.4.23-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
41 matches
Mail list logo
