Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package librack-ruby
Fixes #583553. Other changes are cosmetic.
unblock librack-ruby/1.1.0-4
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT
retitle 595423 unblock: live-build/2.0~a29-1
thanks
live-build (2.0~a29-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Updating auto/scripts handling.
* Adding somewhat prettier header in /etc/apt/sources.list.
* Fixing lb_binary_syslinux to add quiet for the default live entries.
* Correcting typo in lb_con
retitle 595424 unblock: live-manual/2.0~a6-1
thanks
live-manual (1:2.0~a6-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Updating regex for package markups.
* Updating about_manual for squeeze.
* Updating other_installation for squeeze.
* Moving reviewed other_installation to user section.
* Replacing forg
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 08:44 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Please unblock package librack-ruby
>
> Fixes #583553. Other changes are cosmetic.
This appears to have been rejected by dak due to the .orig.tar.gz
mentioned in the .dsc not matching the copy already in the archive;
please let us know on
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 595423 unblock: live-build/2.0~a29-1
Bug #595423 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-build/2.0~a28-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: live-build/2.0~a29-1' from 'unblock:
live-build/2.0~a28-1'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 595424 unblock: live-manual/2.0~a6-1
Bug #595424 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-manual/2.0~a5-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: live-manual/2.0~a6-1' from 'unblock:
live-manual/2.0~a5-1'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 08:47 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> I erroneously removed libppl-swi_0.10.2-8 from hppa instead of mips
> (see #596501), so I ask a binNMU on hppa to restore removed binary.
>
> nmu libppl-swi_0.10.2-8 . hppa . -m "Rebuild for erroneous removal"
That should be ppl, i.e. the
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2010 09:46:06 +0100
with message-id
<1284799566.1138.3319.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#597250: unblock: tomcat6/6.0.28-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #597250,
regarding unblock: tomcat6/6.0.28-6
to be marked as done.
This
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package qdbm
Fixes #592775
unblock qdbm/1.8.77-3.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (700, 'unstable'
Hi,
diff -u chrony-1.24/debian/init.d chrony-1.24/debian/init.d
--- chrony-1.24/debian/init.d
+++ chrony-1.24/debian/init.d
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
# Provides: chrony
# Required-Start:$remote_fs
# Required-Stop: $remote_fs
-# Should-Start: $syslog $network $named
-# Should-Stop:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 17.09.2010, 20:26 +0200 schrieb Christian PERRIER:
> Quoting Joachim Breitner (nome...@debian.org):
> > Hi release team,
> >
> > now that squeeze is frozen I thought that it is time to upgrade my
> > girlfriend’s laptop from lenny to squeeze, so that any bugs we find can
> > b
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 18:24 -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:45:40AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > Yes. You should upload to the same place, and instead of using
> > "unstable" as the target distribution, use "testing" or
> > "testing-proposed-updates". Naturally, since yo
Hello.
I'd like to see smartlist 3.15-22 in squeeze, as it fixes a bug
considered important and the fix is very small. The complete debdiff
is appended below:
diff -Nru smartlist-3.15/debian/changelog smartlist-3.15/debian/changelog
--- smartlist-3.15/debian/changelog 2010-09-18 11:02:12.
Hello.
I'd like to see gettext 0.18.1.1-2 in squeeze as it fixes a "release
goal" (no depends/recommends/suggests on dummy transitional packages),
and the fix is not invasive at all.
The complete debdiff is appended below:
diff -Nru gettext-0.18.1.1/debian/changelog gettext-0.18.1.1/debian/chang
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 11:11 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I'd like to see gettext 0.18.1.1-2 in squeeze as it fixes a "release
> goal" (no depends/recommends/suggests on dummy transitional packages),
> and the fix is not invasive at all.
Unblocked.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
Il giorno Sat, 18 Sep 2010 09:36:57 +0100
"Adam D. Barratt" ha scritto:
> That should be ppl, i.e. the source package.
Ups, sorry.
> Before I schedule a 22-hour build to get one binary package back :) I'm
> assuming dak can't easily be persuaded to re-introduce the old version
> of the package?
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 11:04 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I'd like to see smartlist 3.15-22 in squeeze, as it fixes a bug
> considered important and the fix is very small. The complete debdiff
> is appended below:
[...]
> + * Fixed several scripts to deal with domain names starting with numbers.
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
I erroneously removed libppl-swi_0.10.2-8 from hppa instead of mips
(see #596501), so I ask a binNMU on hppa to restore removed binary.
nmu libppl-swi_0.10.2-8 . hppa . -m "Rebuild for erron
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> merge 597251 597268
Bug#597251: nmu: libppl-swi_0.10.2-8
Bug#597268: nmu: libppl-swi_0.10.2-8
Merged 597251 597268.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:22:38 +0200
with message-id <4c94a0fe.9000...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#595423: unblock: live-build/2.0~a28-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #595423,
regarding unblock: live-build/2.0~a29-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 09/18/2010 09:59 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package qdbm
>
> Fixes #592775
>
> unblock qdbm/1.8.77-3.1
>
It appears that qdbm/1.8.77-3.1 is not uploaded yet
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:30:00 +0200
with message-id <4c94a2b8.2040...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#597233: unblock: hicolor-icon-theme/0.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #597233,
regarding unblock: hicolor-icon-theme/0.12-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Quoting Joachim Breitner (nome...@debian.org):
> yes. It was a “pretty normal” lenny installation with deliberately
> little changes to the system.
I think we should reconsider the priority of the GRUB2 question. Maybe
lower it down to medium?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Philipp Kern writes:
> isn't there anything better than doubling the sleep timeout to
> determine if chrony is indeed awake?
Patches are welcome, of course.
I have had a small number of credible (but unreproducible) reports of
chronyd remaining up but unresponsive for more than a second at startu
Dear Adam,
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:00:06AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> The upload appears to have introduced several other changes which aren't
> documented in the changelog and don't appear related to fixing the bug;
> the changelog just says "Backport fixes to 591862 and related items":
>
On 18/09/10 at 09:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 08:44 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Please unblock package librack-ruby
> >
> > Fixes #583553. Other changes are cosmetic.
>
> This appears to have been rejected by dak due to the .orig.tar.gz
> mentioned in the .dsc no
On 18/09/10 at 13:26 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 09/18/2010 09:59 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Please unblock package qdbm
> >
> > Fixes #592775
> >
> > unblock qd
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2010 16:05:20 +0100
with message-id
<1284822320.12215.22.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#597252: unblock: librack-ruby/1.1.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #597252,
regarding unblock: librack-ruby/1.1.0-4
to be marked as done
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2010 16:07:21 +0100
with message-id
<1284822441.12215.37.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#597261: unblock: qdbm/1.8.77-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #597261,
regarding unblock: qdbm/1.8.77-3.1
to be marked as done.
This me
On 18/09/10 at 16:07 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 16:45 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > Please unblock package qdbm
> [...]
> > > It appears that qdbm/1.8.77-3.1 is not uploaded yet (or got a reject).
> > > Please let us know once it has been accepted.
> >
> > Accepte
Greetings!
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 18:24 -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:45:40AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
>> > Yes. You should upload to the same place, and instead of using
>> > "unstable" as the target distribution, use "testing" or
>> > "
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 01:01 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> As a consequence, I think that the package is in good shape, and I would
> like to ask for an unblock. Changelog is:
>
> * Non-maintainer upload.
> * Fixed some "return as new is deprecated" warnings (Closes: #595344).
> * Now depend
2010/9/3 Martin-Éric Racine :
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 09:33:19 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote:
>>
>>> I saw this thread from top to the end.
>>> Is it because the patch
>>>
>>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/drive
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2010 16:53:28 +0100
with message-id
<1284825208.12215.337.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#597167: unblock: foomatic-db-engine/4.0.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #597167,
regarding unblock: foomatic-db-engine/4.0.4-3
to be m
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2010 16:57:25 +0100
with message-id
<1284825445.12215.366.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#597018: unblock: piwigo/2.1.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #597018,
regarding unblock: piwigo/2.1.2-2
to be marked as done.
This mea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 596939 + confirmed
Bug #596939 [release.debian.org] future unbloc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 597119 + moreinfo
Bug #597119 [release.debian.org] unblock: libff
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 07:33:40PM +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:24:59PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:31:27PM +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote:
> > > I checked all Breaks, Provides and Conflicts statements in
> > > debian/control. They
> > > all
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package isdnutils
The last QA upload stops b-d'ing on tcl8.3, and so that could be remove (tracked
at #472957.
unblock isdnutils/1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.1-3
-- System Informati
Hi,
As mentioned in the minutes of our recent IRC meeting[1] we have
reached the conclusion that hppa will not be a release architecture for
the Squeeze release.
Within the next few days, we'll be taking the next step in this process,
and instructing the testing migration scripts to ignore hppa f
Hello,
Here is a request for freeze exceptions over a bunch of packages, for
similar changes. I'm available on #debian-release this week-end for any
detail discussion.
First, java stuff: I had to change the dependency to adapt to newer
package names.
isorelax_2004-4
jing-trang_2009-3
jo
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package quagga
Only change:
* Added Danisch Debconf translation (thanks to Joe Dalton). Closes: #596259
unblock quagga/0.99.17-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: sque
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2010 18:49:06 +0100
with message-id
<1284832147.12215.1174.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#597327: unblock: quagga/0.99.17-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #597327,
regarding unblock: quagga/0.99.17-2
to be marked as done.
Thi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 596939 unblock: kdepim-runtime/4:4.4.6-1
Bug #596939 [release.debian.org] future unblock: kdepim-runtime/4:4.4.6-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: kdepim-runtime/4:4.4.6-1' from 'future unblock:
kdepim-runtime/4:4.4.6-1'
> severity 596939
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2010 18:54:58 +0100
with message-id
<1284832499.12215.1217.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#597319: unblock: isdnutils/1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #597319,
regarding unblock: isdnutils/1:3.9.20060704+d
retitle 596939 unblock: kdepim-runtime/4:4.4.6-1
severity 596939 normal
thanks
Hello,
On penktadienis 17 Rugsėjis 2010 16:03:47 Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 15/09/2010 10:55, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > Would you grant a freeze exception for this package after it spends
> > some time in unstable? Tha
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mock
The upload fixes an RC bug, the solution is sub-optimal, but at least it works.
unblock mock/1.0.8-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT p
retitle 596364 unblock: cracklib2/2.8.16-4
thanks
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 06:12:47PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 07:33:40PM +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote:
> > I re-added the Conflicts: python-crack (an updated debdiff is attached to
> > this mail). I tested the upgrade from
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 19:59 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Please unblock package mock
>
> The upload fixes an RC bug, the solution is sub-optimal, but at least it
> works.
I have to admit to being somewhat confused by the diff; this looks
rather large for a simple change to Makefile.in:
patches/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 596364 unblock: cracklib2/2.8.16-4
Bug #596364 [release.debian.org] future unblock: cracklib2/2.8.16-4
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: cracklib2/2.8.16-4' from 'future unblock:
cracklib2/2.8.16-4'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> For the record, this has been unblocked and migrated.
>
> Regards,
>
> Adam
Thanks a lot Adam.
Now there's only php-xml-parser to have unblocked for this series of PHP
5.3 corrections, and we'll be good to go for all the php PEAR packages
that I maintain or depend-on. I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock python-django 1.2.3-1
This is a new upstream micro-release, it contains a security fix for
#596205 and many small bugfixes. The debdiff is rather large but
upstream is very s
Hello,
On penktadienis 17 Rugsėjis 2010 16:07:23 Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 15/09/2010 10:55, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > Speaking strictly about kdepim source package, its diff is rather big
> > (see diffstat below). However, given what I said above, would you grant
> > a freeze exception for this
On Di, Sep 14, 2010 at 06:47:25 (CEST), Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
> On 13-09-2010 10:34, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> With your permission, I'd like to upload the following debdiff to fix a
>> rather embarrassing bug:
>
> Please, upload and let us know once it got accepted.
it is now.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi !
Spip 2.1.2 has been released a couple of day ago.
It consists of a one-liner fix for an int overflow
on 32 bit machines in the articles' published date.
A release-critical
Hello,
On 2010-09-18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 19:59 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Please unblock package mock
>>
>> The upload fixes an RC bug, the solution is sub-optimal, but at least it
>> works.
>
> I have to admit to being somewhat confused by the diff; this looks
> rat
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove the source-package "libprojectm" and it's binary pkg
"libprojectm-data" from Debian testing and unstable.
The package has been replaced by the new package "projectm", which
provides a new version of projectM. The old "libprojectm" package
Package: libmilter1.0.1
Version: 8.14.3-9.2
Severity: grave
As this bug renders almost every milter-dependable software at least impaired
(if not unusable) the severity of this bug should be considered grave (making
the package unfit for release). If the maintainer is not able or willing to
solve
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 22:17 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Di, Sep 14, 2010 at 06:47:25 (CEST), Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
> wrote:
>
> > On 13-09-2010 10:34, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >> With your permission, I'd like to upload the following debdiff to fix a
> >> rather embarrassing b
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:55:32 +0200, Stefan Bauer wrote:
> whats the status on this hppa build? I want to see openmotif in the
> current unstable version to be in testing -> stable. I'm not a DD so
> my hands are tied :/
>
hppa out-of-date-ness is likely to get ignored by the testing scripts i
reassign 597353 ftp.debian.org
thanks
Reassigning to ftp.d.o as removal from unstable was requested; the
removal will then automagically propagate to testing.
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 22:34 +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> Please remove the source-package "libprojectm" and it's binary pkg
> "libproje
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 597353 ftp.debian.org
Bug #597353 [release.debian.org] RM: libprojectm; RoM
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
597353: ht
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package mtkbabel.
It contains two fixes which work around bugs with two different GPS
devices (the rest of the changelog is mostly cosmetic stuff).
The changelog is
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 23:04 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On 2010-09-18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 19:59 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> >> Please unblock package mock
> >>
> >> The upload fixes an RC bug, the solution is sub-optimal, but at least it
> >> works.
> >
> > I have to
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2010 22:47:02 +0100
with message-id
<1284846422.12215.3070.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#597346: unblock: spip/2.1.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #597346,
regarding unblock: spip/2.1.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means
nvidia-xconfig is an X configuration utility that generates a
configuration file specifically for the proprietary non-free NVIDIA X
drivers. Since upstream only releases these drivers for i386 and amd64,
it's pointless to build this package on any other architecture.
Could you please remove the o
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock the latest cairo upload.
cairo (1.8.10-6) unstable; urgency=low
.
* debian/patches/02_iceweasel-buggy-repeat.patch:
+ Revert logic of the patch for the infa
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 14:53 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> nvidia-xconfig is an X configuration utility that generates a
> configuration file specifically for the proprietary non-free NVIDIA X
> drivers. Since upstream only releases these drivers for i386 and amd64,
> it's pointless to build this pa
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 14:53 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> nvidia-xconfig is an X configuration utility that generates a
>> configuration file specifically for the proprietary non-free NVIDIA X
>> drivers. Since upstream only releases these drivers for i386 and
>> amd6
Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 00:26:09 +0200
with message-id <20100918222609.gc4...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#597330: unblock: mock/1.0.8-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #597330,
regarding unblock: mock/1.0.8-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
[ Short version for the impatient - I'd like to make britney require all
architectures to be built in t-p-u before paying any attention to an
"approve" hint ]
Hi,
For as long as I can remember, the advice for adding "approve" hints to
migrate packages from t-p-u to testing has been "make sure the
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 15:22 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> > britney doesn't support partial removals from testing (they generally
> > wouldn't help anyway as e.g. out-of-date checks are relative to
> > unstable, not testing); this is generally achieved by ftp-master
> >
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> It's a known issue with reportbug's release.d.o handling; it should tell
> you to mail -release for source removals and suggest an ftp.d.o bug
> otherwise.
> Sandro has a patch for this but, at least when we last discussed it, it
> wasn't considered enough of a proble
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [100919 00:33]:
> [ Short version for the impatient - I'd like to make britney require all
> architectures to be built in t-p-u before paying any attention to an
> "approve" hint ]
cool. can we please as well get an force-approve? ;=)
Andi
--
To UN
Hi,
I've got a few changes queued up for xorg-server in lenny, and was
wondering if it's worth uploading them at some point soonish. I guess I
could add the fix for CVE-2009-1573 (a minor bug in xvfb-run).
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index b222ff9..7db9a4a 100644
--- a/debia
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:04:59 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [100919 00:33]:
> > [ Short version for the impatient - I'd like to make britney require all
> > architectures to be built in t-p-u before paying any attention to an
> > "approve" hint ]
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
The main reason for this request is #567909, the rest is mostly
cosmetic.
+xorg (1:7.5+7) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Julien Cristau ]
+ * Nuke x11-common's Conflicts. This was needed fo
retitle 595424 unblock: live-manual/2.0~a7-1
thanks
live-manual (1:2.0~a7-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Updating other_customization-contents for squeeze.
* Moving reviewed other_customization-contents to user section.
* Really removing undistributable Debian logo (Closes: #597237).
-- Danie
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 595424 unblock: live-manual/2.0~a7-1
Bug #595424 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-manual/2.0~a6-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: live-manual/2.0~a7-1' from 'unblock:
live-manual/2.0~a6-1'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 597242 + moreinfo
Bug #597242 [release.debian.org] unblock: ekeyd
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
597242: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597242
Debian
On 09/19/2010 12:33 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> As a consequence of all of the above, I'd like to propose modifying the
> semantics of "approve" so that the hint can be added straight away and
> the t-p-u package only becomes a valid candidate once it's available on
> all the architectures on whi
Hi
I unblocked lazarus as it fixes an RC bug and the diff looks fine.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c95a95b.30...@debian.org
* Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100919 01:39]:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:04:59 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
> > * Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [100919 00:33]:
> > > [ Short version for the impatient - I'd like to make britney require all
> > > architectures to be built in
83 matches
Mail list logo
