Status of Squeeze Release Notes

Hello, I am upgrading a lenny system to squeeze next weekend. Are there already any release notes which I could test and provide feedback for? Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: rdor...@web.de jabber: rdor...@jabber.org GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C

Re: nfs-kernel-server, 2.6.32 and lenny

On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 12:08 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 01:40:10PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 08:45 -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > >>On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 09:09:11AM +0100, John Winters wrote: > >>>2) Kernel 2.6.32-2 causes problems

Re: permission to upload ICU 4.4 to unstable

Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > ICU 4.4 was released a few weeks ago. There are very few changes from > 4.4.rc1. I'm going to do one upload of 4.4 to experimental to make sure > it builds properly on all platforms. If all goes well, I'd like to go > ahead and upload to unstable. Please let me know wh

NEW changes in proposedupdates

Processing changes file: jasper_1.900.1-5.1+lenny1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: jasper_1.900.1-5.1+lenny1_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: jasper_1.900.1-5.1+lenny1_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: jasper_1.900.1-5.1+lenny1_armel.changes ACCEPT Proce

Re: permission to upload ICU 4.4 to unstable

* Jay Berkenbilt (q...@debian.org) [100418 16:00]: > Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > > > ICU 4.4 was released a few weeks ago. There are very few changes from > > 4.4.rc1. I'm going to do one upload of 4.4 to experimental to make sure > > it builds properly on all platforms. If all goes well, I'd like

Re: Status of Squeeze Release Notes

Hi, On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:32:49AM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote: > I am upgrading a lenny system to squeeze next weekend. Are there already any > release notes which I could test and provide feedback for? There is no version of release-notes dedicated to Squeeze yet. However, a feedback again

Re: nfs-kernel-server, 2.6.32 and lenny

On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 13:06 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I'm intending to upload nfs-utils to stable-proposed-updates with the > following changes, to support partial upgrades (specifically kernel > upgrades). Please ack/nak. > > Ben. > > diff -u nfs-utils-1.1.2/debian/changelog nfs-utils-1.1.2

binNMU kdebindings?

Hi, python-kde4 is currently uninstallable due to invalid dependencies. According to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567528#54 a simple rebuild fixed the problem. Thus I want to ask whether it makes sense to binNMU kdebindings because I want to start packaging jockey and due

Re: binNMU kdebindings?

On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 19:24 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > python-kde4 is currently uninstallable due to invalid > dependencies. According to > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567528#54 > a simple rebuild fixed the problem. Which is intriguing, given that it was a binNMU

Re: Status of Squeeze Release Notes

On Sun,18.Apr.10, 18:01:08, Simon Paillard wrote: > There is no version of release-notes dedicated to Squeeze yet. Wouldn't it be high time to create it? Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offto

NEW changes in proposedupdates

Processing changes file: pidgin_2.4.3-4lenny6_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.4.3-4lenny6_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.4.3-4lenny6_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.4.3-4lenny6_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

Bug#573486: RM: emacs22/22.3+1-1.2

On 2010-04-18 22:49 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Indeed, emacs22 can be removed now. > > "dak rm -Rn -s testing emacs22" still shows a blocking dep, but that seems > to be a bug, python2.5-doc is built from the source package python2.5 > now, which build-depends on emacs23: > >

Bug#573486: RM: emacs22/22.3+1-1.2

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:59:45AM +0300, Tommi Vainikainen wrote: > Sven Joachim writes: > > It's not so easy since there are a few packages which would be broken: > > ... > > > Note that this comes from xemacs21 not being in testing; the xemacs21 > > maintainer's lack of response to RC bugs su

Re: Status of Squeeze Release Notes

i've upgraded 2 PC's to squeeze and in one of them (the last one recently) i got some problems regarding udev and linux kernel. Linux image needs a newer udev, udev needs an udev (or something like this) enabled kernel. so i forced the installation of both kernel and udev/lib udev and rebooted. j

Re: Status of Squeeze Release Notes

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 20:42:09 +0100, Luis Matos wrote: > i've upgraded 2 PC's to squeeze and in one of them (the last one > recently) i got some problems regarding udev and linux kernel. Linux > image needs a newer udev, udev needs an udev (or something like this) > enabled kernel. > > so i fo

Bug#578330: pu: package alien-arena/7.0-1+lenny2

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Severity: normal hi, i've built a proposed update that corrects two security vulnerabilities in the alien-arena package. please review the attached debdiff. thanks, mike alien-arena.debdiff Description: Binar

Bug#578346: transition: camlp5

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello, The following packages need to go to testing together: easy camlp5/5.13-1 coq/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6/amd64/8.2.pl1+dfsg-