On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Dear fellow developers,
>
> we all want to get out squeeze as soon as possible. Currently we are
> still at 400 bugs concerning the next stable release, with 300 of them not
> yet fixed in unstable.
>
> We would like to know what ne
Hi Luk,
On Sonntag, 14. März 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
> It's time to stop thinking I would be able to keep working as Release
> Manager in this climate, I hereby resign as Release Manager.
Thank you a lot for your awesome work as a release manager!
I'm sad to see (you resign like) this and hope t
Hi,
Philipp Kern wrote:
> We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to
> be fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features
> or new upstream versions you want to see in squeeze which are not
> ready yet.
With my pkg-wml hat on:
The pkg-wml team recently h
Pursuant to [1] here is a summary of the state of Ada packages
in Debian.
The short summary is: All is well, we are ready for the freeze
except for one package.
The long summary follows.
We first published the revised Debian Policy for Ada[2] back in
October. There is now a link to this docume
Philipp Kern wrote:
Hi,
> fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
> upstream versions you want to see in squeeze which are not ready yet.
If at all possible, I'd like to get sane-backends 1.0.21 into
Squeeze. 1.0.20 is old and 1.0.21 would bring many new features
Hi,
Before squeeze, I would like to upload libyaz4 (soname transition
from libyaz3). It is already uploaded in experimental and I talked
to maintainer of package depending on yaz. Some are already ready,
the other require minor modifications.
There are few rdepends for libyaz. Can I upload t
Package: libc6
Version: 2.11-0exp6
Severity: serious
The following test failures/regressions are applicable
to hppa/experimental. I have no buildd log URL to
provide for this.
tstdiomisc.out
tststatic2.out
tststatic.out
tst-tls9-static.out
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@l
Hello Everyone,
Based on Phillipp's message I'm not sure if I should file a release
bug or not. I'm working on getting the upcoming release of OpenSAF[1]
version 4.0 into Squeeze. OpenSAF is an high availably middleware
based on the Service Availability Forum specifications. The final
upstream rel
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
> debian-release@lists.debian.org and if every team that still faces work
> could write up a corresponding bug report filed against release.debian.org,
> preferably
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Dear fellow developers,
>
> We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
> fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
> upstream versions you want to see in squeeze which are not
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 06:24:40AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 23:04 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > I want to get rid of octave3.0 for Squeeze. Please hint it out of
> > testing.
>
> You'll need to make sure nothing still depends on it in testing before
> it can be
Hello,
Le dimanche 14 mars 2010 à 21:42 +0100, Philipp Kern a écrit :
> Dear fellow developers,
>
>
> We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
> fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
> upstream versions you want to see in squeeze whi
Bill Allombert writes:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
>> fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
>> upstream versions you want to see in squeeze which are not
What if freeze was tomorrow?
well we are quite in a decent shape. Basically, at my knowledge the only
missing transition is about netcdf 4.1. You know, I'm always not inclined
to add the latest and greatest when freezing time are too near and netcdf
is not an exception, but the missing 4 version t
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:06:54PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> What if freeze was tomorrow?
>
Grunt, sorry guys... Wrong list :-/
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
Il giorno 14/mar/2010, alle ore 21.42, Philipp Kern ha scritto:
> We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
> fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
> upstream versions you want to see in squeeze which are not ready yet.
> Furthermore we
Processing changes file: apr_1.2.7-9_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apr_1.2.7-9_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apr_1.2.7-9_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apr_1.2.7-9_hppa.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: apr_1.2.7-9_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Pro
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Dear fellow developers,
>
> we all want to get out squeeze as soon as possible. Currently we are
> still at 400 bugs concerning the next stable release, with 300 of them not
> yet fixed in unstable.
>
> We would like to know what ne
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 573974 RM: josm-plugins/testing -- ROM; prevents josm from migrating;
> doesn't work with sid's josm
Bug #573974 [ftp.debian.org] RM: josm-plugins -- ROM; prevents josm from
migrating; doesn't work with sid's josm
Changed Bug title to 'R
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
> debian-release@lists.debian.org and if every team that still faces work
openoffice.org mostly should be on track and shouldn't change that much
anymore (exc
20 matches
Mail list logo
