Re: Give-back XSane on powerpc; build has gone missing

Hi, On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 17:09 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: > The build of xsane 0.996-3 for powerpc has gone missing. Care to give it > back? > > gb xsane_0.996-3 . powerpc Given back. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsub

Re: BinNMU for xf86-input-tslib

Hi, On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 08:17 +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: > xf86-input-tslib provides xserver-xorg-input-4, which conflicts with > latest xserver-xorg-core. > > Rebuild against xserver-xorg-dev 2:1.7.4-1 fix the problem. > > xserver-xorg-dev in all architectures has been updated to 2:1.7.4-1.

Re: nmu: gthumb 3:2.10.11-3 (was: Re: Bug#565350: image that crashes gthumb with a segfault)

Hi, On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 15:31 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > On Friday 15 January 2010 10:11:57, David Paleino wrote: > > On Friday 15 January 2010 01:04:27, Joey Hess wrote: > > > gth_minimal_exif_tag_read: TAG value does not fit, Can't read full value > > > zsh: segmentation fault gthumb CIMG0

Re: Fwd: Bug#562413: commit-tool: Depends on python2.4 packages

Hi, On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 12:36 +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote: > Wrong address in the previous mail, sorry. > >Vincent The previous mail said (in part): > It will be remove from debian. See #557652 for details as I said in my > previous mail in this bug report. > Simon McVittie told me in 55

Bug#565385: marked as done (RM: commit-tool from testing)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:41:39 + with message-id <1263663699.27674.12124.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net> and subject line Re: Fwd: Bug#562413: commit-tool: Depends on python2.4 packages has caused the Debian Bug report #565385, regarding RM: commit-tool from testing

Re: Please NMU virtualbox-ose against new xserver-xorg.

Hi, On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 13:56 +0100, Michael Meskes wrote: > with the new xserver bringing a new ABI version virtualbox-ose drivers located > in virtualbox-ose-guest-x11 need to be recompiled. With this recompilation > #564555 will be fixed. But unless upstream releases a new version there are n

Bug#564808: marked as done (nmu: kdenetwork_4:4.3.4-1)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:53:17 + with message-id <1263664397.27674.12237.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net> and subject line Re: Bug#564808: nmu: kdenetwork_4:4.3.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #564808, regarding nmu: kdenetwork_4:4.3.4-1 to be marked as done. Th

Bug#565263: marked as done (nmu: haskell-utf8-string reverse dependencies)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:47:17 + with message-id <1263664037.27674.12180.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net> and subject line Re: Bug#565263: nmu: haskell-utf8-string reverse dependencies has caused the Debian Bug report #565263, regarding nmu: haskell-utf8-string revers

Bug#564305: marked as done (nmu: blockattack_1.3.1-4)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:55:29 + with message-id <1263664529.27674.12256.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net> and subject line Re: Bug#564305: nmu: blockattack_1.3.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #564305, regarding nmu: blockattack_1.3.1-4 to be marked as done. This

Re: BinNMU for wsola

Hi, On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 19:47 +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: > the wsola package is currently not installable in sid: [...] > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > wsola: Depends: mffm-fftw1c2 but it is not installable > E: Broken packages > > > However, I could install bui

Re: Fwd: Bug#562413: commit-tool: Depends on python2.4 packages

On 16/01/2010 18:41, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 12:36 +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote: Wrong address in the previous mail, sorry. Vincent The previous mail said (in part): It will be remove from debian. See #557652 for details as I said in my previous mail in this bu

Re: [SRM] Bug #554793

Hi, On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 16:29 +0100, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:44:12PM +, Tim Small wrote: > > Just to add some background to this... The watchdog module is > > typically deployed on systems which require a high uptime. > > ... > > To make the decision easier here'

NEW changes in proposedupdates

Processing changes file: transmission_1.22-1+lenny2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: transmission_1.22-1+lenny2_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: transmission_1.22-1+lenny2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: transmission_1.22-1+lenny2_arm.changes ACCEPT Pr

NEW changes in oldproposedupdates

Processing changes file: libthai_0.1.6-1+etch1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libthai_0.1.6-1+etch1_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libthai_0.1.6-1+etch1_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libthai_0.1.6-1+etch1_hppa.changes ACCEPT Processing changes fil

Cyrus-imapd status update

I had a somewhat productive afternoon, and I have 2.3.16 (latest stable) compiling well. It might even work ;-) The build system and autotooling is still a bit of a mess, and debian/patches needs a dire cleanup. Most of that stuff needs to go upstream, and we need to go back in time and triple c

Re: Cyrus-imapd status update

On 16/01/10 23:56 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: I had a somewhat productive afternoon, and I have 2.3.16 (latest stable) compiling well. It might even work ;-) Henrique, What can I do to help? -- Dan White -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Re: Cyrus-imapd status update

On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Dan White wrote: > On 16/01/10 23:56 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > >I had a somewhat productive afternoon, and I have 2.3.16 (latest stable) > >compiling well. It might even work ;-) > > Henrique, > > What can I do to help? Depends... in the 2.2 side, the BTS