-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 17:48 +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
I have prepared a 0.6.7.2 version which can be found here: [2], [3]. The
debdiff is attached (9 source files changed, 133 insertions and 151
deletions).
Please go ahead.
Thanks, I will up
Bonjour,
J'ai la distribution Debian Etch et je voudrais faire la migration de mon
système d'exploitation.
J'ai modifié ma sources.list en focntion de lenny.
Les trois opérations effectuées sont:
# aptitude update
# aptitude install apt dpkg aptitude
# aptitude dist-upgrade
A la fin de la dernièr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 561341 release.debian.org
Bug #561341 [ftp.debian.org] RM: Please remove debian-edu-config_1.430~svn60149
from P-U-NEW
Bug reassigned from package 'ftp.debian.org' to 'release.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
I intend to upload linux-2.6, linux-latest-2.6 and firmware-nonfree tonight.
There should be no new binary packages for linux-2.6. Any objections?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 05:54:29PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I intend to upload linux-2.6, linux-latest-2.6 and firmware-nonfree tonight.
> There should be no new binary packages for linux-2.6. Any objections?
No objections here. Micah and I have been working w/ vserver upstream
and have a pa
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:10:15AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 05:54:29PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I intend to upload linux-2.6, linux-latest-2.6 and firmware-nonfree tonight.
> > There should be no new binary packages for linux-2.6. Any objections?
>
> No objectio
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 06:30:21PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:10:15AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 05:54:29PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I intend to upload linux-2.6, linux-latest-2.6 and firmware-nonfree
> > > tonight.
> > > There sho
Hi,
I've just uploaded an update of clock-setup (0.97lenny1) with a workaround
for a bug in rdate (see changelog for bug numbers).
On some systems, when the hardware clock is not set, the system will boot
with a system date before the epoch (1-1-1970). In those cases rdate fails
to update the
Hi,
eeepc-acpi-scripts 1.1.4, just released by the debian-eeepc team,
closes RC bug #559578 which inadvertently already migrated to testing
(I still don't know how that happened). However, we neglected to set
urgency=high. Would you please fix that?
Thanks,
Ben
--
,-. nSLUGhttp://www.nslu
Hello,
A rebuild is needed in order for python-edbus to pick up the latest version of
libedbus.
dw python-edbus_0.3.1+svn20090511-2 . ALL . -m 'edbus (>= edbus_0.5.0.063-1)'
-d unstable
Regards,
--
Albin Tonnerre
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 09:46 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> Currently the migration of libxmlrpc3-java [1] to testing is blocked
> because of build failure on certain architectures. But the build
> failure is a tool chain issue [2] and not an issue with package
> itself. It was suggested by Dann
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 13:19 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Could you please schedule a rebuild of gwave on amd64. It is
> uninstallable due to dep on old libltdl3.
Scheduled.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Your message dated Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:35:19 +
with message-id
<1261002919.4485.2648.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#561310: nmu: xml-security-c_1.5.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #561310,
regarding nmu: xml-security-c_1.5.1-2
to be marked as done.
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 23:04 +0100, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> A rebuild is needed in order for python-edbus to pick up the latest version of
> libedbus.
>
> dw python-edbus_0.3.1+svn20090511-2 . ALL . -m 'edbus (>= edbus_0.5.0.063-1)'
> -d unstable
binNMUs have been scheduled for python-edbus
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:50 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 23:04 +0100, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> > A rebuild is needed in order for python-edbus to pick up the latest version
> > of
> > libedbus.
> >
> > dw python-edbus_0.3.1+svn20090511-2 . ALL . -m 'edbus (>=
> >
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 00:30 +0100, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> Sorry, I just realized that the dep-wait expression should contain the binary
> package
> name, not the source package. That would then be:
>
> dw python-edbus_0.3.1+svn20090511-2 . ALL . -m 'libedbus-dev (>=
> 0.5.0.063-1)' -d unstable
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 21:26 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> I've just uploaded an update of clock-setup (0.97lenny1) with a workaround
> for a bug in rdate (see changelog for bug numbers).
[...]
> Please accept the new version.
Accepted.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 16:25 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 13 December 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Accepted for both stable and oldstable (already built everywhere for
>
> Thanks.
>
> > stable, oldstable is waiting for ftpmaster to process p-u-new again).
>
> Any chance of that happeni
18 matches
Mail list logo
