On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Barth wrote:
> As from release team point of view, it is necessary that there is a plan
> how hppa can and will return in the forseeable future to normal mode of
> operation, i.e. there are not many issues with e.g. architecture specific
> build failures.
>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:10:28PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:53 PM, dann frazier wrote:
> > We have been running with UP kernels for quite some time, and they
> > haven't proven to be any more stable. Most recently I've upgraded
> > peri/penalosa to 2.6.31-rc6-based
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:26 PM, dann frazier wrote:
> After about a week of loaded uptime, penalosa returned to instability
> over the weekend.
>
> It began with an Illegal instruction leading to a panic:
> http://people.debian.org/~dannf/penalosa/penalosa.0
>
> I then rebooted it, and the conso
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 03:36:48PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:26 PM, dann frazier wrote:
> > After about a week of loaded uptime, penalosa returned to instability
> > over the weekend.
> >
> > It began with an Illegal instruction leading to a panic:
> > http://peopl
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:56 PM, dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 03:36:48PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:26 PM, dann frazier wrote:
>> > After about a week of loaded uptime, penalosa returned to instability
>> > over the weekend.
>> >
>> > It began with
Hi.
On Sep 13 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Ben Hutchings [2009-09-13 18:28]:
> > In the mean time, 2.6.30 has had more stable updates, and there are many
> > other bugs with patches available (the most important being #541307). I
> > propose that we should make another upload of 2.6.30, alt
6 matches
Mail list logo
