irssi update for lenny

Hi! Please find attached a proposed update for irssi in lenny to fix CVE-2009-1959. It's a too minor issue to warrant a DSA so I have to go this path. I chose this versioning because the next version after 0.8.12-6 was a new upstream version so there is no need to special release-mangle

Re: irssi update for lenny (and etch)

Hi! * Gerfried Fuchs [2009-06-19 11:48:30 CEST]: > Please find attached a proposed update for irssi in lenny to fix > CVE-2009-1959. It's a too minor issue to warrant a DSA so I have to go > this path. I noticed that I fumbled with the distribution part in the changelog, so here is the

Please unblock dmraid/1.0.0.rc15-8

Hi, Could you unblock dmraid/1.0.0.rc15-8 please? Cheers, Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

I take a regular look at various arches why packages are not correctly built. hppa is the most annoying arch for me. If you look at the stats you will notice that it's almost always the lowest in the stats. The reason it more or less keeps up is because I put alot of time in looking at the state

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:15:26PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Here is a list of packages that failed to build because of instability > on the buildds today: > package | buildd | error > qgit| penalosa | make: *** [install] Segmentation fault > acpica-unix | peri | make: *** [inst

new freedoom packages for stable and oldstable to fix copyvio

Hello release team, Somebody has reported a copyright violation in the Freedoom package (#533135), unfortunately the violation dates back to the 0.5-1 version of freedoom which is in oldstable and stable's version is also affected. The fix is relatively simple, at least: merely deleting the affec

Re: new freedoom packages for stable and oldstable to fix copyvio

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 06:56:50PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: > I am preparing packages suitable for oldstable and stable > now. I will reply with interdiffs once I have prepared them. Lenny interdiff attached. Note that as alluded to in the copyright hunk, the orig tarball is modified by removing

Re: new freedoom packages for stable and oldstable to fix copyvio

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 06:56:50PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: > I am preparing packages suitable for oldstable and stable > now. I will reply with interdiffs once I have prepared them. Etch attached. Essentially the same as lenny. diff -u freedoom-0.5/debian/changelog freedoom-0.5+dfsg1/debian/chan

octave3.2 autobuild problems

The octave3.2 package failed to autobuild on ia64 and is stuck on powerpc. This is blocking our planned transition of the octave-forge packages from octave3.0 to octave3.2 [1]. The failure on caballero is due to the infamous alternatives problem [2] but nobody seem to care. I wish I could ask fo

Re: octave3.2 autobuild problems

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:49:34PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > The octave3.2 package failed to autobuild on ia64 and is stuck on > powerpc. This is blocking our planned transition of the octave-forge > packages from octave3.0 to octave3.2 [1]. > > The failure on caballero is due to the inf

Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] octave3.2 autobuild problems

* Kurt Roeckx [2009-06-19 23:48]: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:49:34PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > The octave3.2 package failed to autobuild on ia64 and is stuck on > > powerpc. This is blocking our planned transition of the octave-forge > > packages from octave3.0 to octave3.2 [1]. > >

Re: new freedoom packages for stable and oldstable to fix copyvio

I have uploaded the new packages to a temporary repository at : oldstable: stable: Please let me know if they are OK for uplo

Re: octave3.2 autobuild problems

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:49:34PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > The failure on caballero is due to the infamous alternatives problem [2] but > nobody seem to care. I wish I could ask for this: > 2: http://lists.debian.org/debian-wb-team/2009/06/msg00058.html I'll go fix caballero tonight -