udev 0.141-1 migration

2009-04-21 Thread Adeodato Simó
Marco, you mentioned release action was needed for udev and hal to migrate together ASAP. However, you didn’t mention that libvolume-id’s SONAME had been bumped, in which case we would’ve detected earlier that redhat-cluster also needed a rebuild against this new SONAME. I’ve scheduled Bin-NMUs f

Re: udev 0.141-1 migration

2009-04-21 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Apr 21, Adeodato Simó wrote: > you mentioned release action was needed for udev and hal to migrate > together ASAP. However, you didn???t mention that libvolume-id???s SONAME > had been bumped, in which case we would???ve detected earlier that > redhat-cluster also needed a rebuild against thi

Re: Testing removals for GTK 1.2 removal

2009-04-21 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 11:10:54PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Hi, > the following source packages have at least one binary package, which > is now uninstallable, because one or more of it's depencies have been > removed (GTK 1.2, Imlib1). Please remove them from testing: > Hi Moritz, >Fr

krb5 transation: krb5 1.7

2009-04-21 Thread Sam Hartman
Around a month ago, I had discussions of a transition to the krb5 package on debian-devel. The steps so far have been something that hasn't broken anything and I believe has been fairly low impact. However I'd like the release team's review for the next part and advice on one of two directions.

Re: [oldstable] binutils update for mips

2009-04-21 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:49:27PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > With the approval of the current debian maintainer[1], I'd like to > propose an oldstable update for binutils. See below for the > details. debdiff attached. > > Risk of regression should be low as this is adding support for a > synta

Re: udev 0.141-1 migration

2009-04-21 Thread Adeodato Simó
+ Marco d'Itri (Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:20:00 +0200): > On Apr 21, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > you mentioned release action was needed for udev and hal to migrate > > together ASAP. However, you didn???t mention that libvolume-id???s SONAME > > had been bumped, in which case we would???ve detected earl

Re: Dealing better with CD releases

2009-04-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:53:35PM +0200, Thilo Six wrote: >Thilo Six wrote the following on 15.04.2009 22:20 >>> >> How about a directory with links to current isos dricetly then? >> >> current $ ls -l >> total 0 >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 USER USER 37 2009-04-15 22:18 current-stable-ARCH-1.iso -> >> ../ARC

Re: Dealing better with CD releases

2009-04-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 01:28:56PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Hi! Hey! >* Steve McIntyre [2009-04-15 15:36:57 CEST]: > >> We currently potentially have a window of a few hours of breakage, as >> the web pages that point directly to the old images stay around for >> quite a while. Even

Re: Dealing better with CD releases

2009-04-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:06:25AM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote: >On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:49:49PM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: >> On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 14:36 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> > At the moment we have problems when we do releases including new >> > CD/DVD images, as you'll see from m

Re: [SRM] Possible update for nss

2009-04-21 Thread Luk Claes
Mike Hommey wrote: Hi, Bug #509930 makes nss crash on sparc (as reported on our BTS) and ia64 (as reported upstream). It has the bad side effect to make iceweasel and anything using nss OCSP check. I'm currently uploading a fix to unstable, but I think it would be a good thing to have this fix i

Re: Solr 1.2.0+ds1-3+lenny1

2009-04-21 Thread Luk Claes
Jan-Pascal van Best wrote: Dear release team, I'd like to propose an update to the solr package in Lenny to fix bug#522992. It's an installability bug, which causes # apt-get install solr-tomcat5.5 to fail for a new installation of solr-tomcat5.5 if tomcat5.5 isn't installed before. Please find

Re: Bug#521394: Pre-approval for heartbeat stable-proposed-updates upload (2.1.3-6lenny3)

2009-04-21 Thread Luk Claes
Simon Horman wrote: Hi, I would like to upload a(nother) fresh version of heartbeat to fix a but in the o2cf resource. Without the simple fix suggested by Michel, the script is completely broken - though I should not that the script was first deprecated and more recently removed from upstream.

Re: Non-DFSG files distributed in fluidsynth package

2009-04-21 Thread Luk Claes
David Henningsson wrote: Hello Release team, while working on adopting my first package (fluidsynth), non-DFSG files were discovered in all releases of fluidsynth, both unstable, testing, stable and oldstable. (bug: #524566) The non-DFSG files is a soundfont and some documentation, and is only