Re: lam out of sync in lenny

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 05:21:52PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > I'm not sure if this is even an issue (or known). The lam binaries are > out of sync on ia64 in lenny and squeeze: > > lam-runtime | 7.1.2-1.3 |stable | ia64 > lam-runtime | 7.1.2-1.3 | testing | ia64 > lam-runtime |

Re: preapproval for asciidoc 8.2.7-3~lenny+1

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:43:03PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > would you accept an upload of asciidoc to s-pu-u, fixing one serious and two > important bugs: I would, please go ahead. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://phi

Re: preapproval for asciidoc 8.2.7-3~lenny+1

Hi, On Donnerstag, 26. März 2009, Philipp Kern wrote: > I would, please go ahead. thanks. uploaded and updated the wiki page. regards, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: SKB BUG: Invalid truesize

tags 498...@bugs.debian.org stop Emiliano Castagnari writes: > I am getting this kernel messages at least 9 times per second. This patch should fix the issue: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=blob;f=review-2.6.27/net-kill-skb_truesize_check-it-only-catches-f

Re: Libass transition

* Christophe Mutricy [Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:16:24 +0100]: > Hmm, now i 've just read your mail on d-d-a and both package are > affected. So I guess I should wait for the ffmpeg+libraw1394 transition > to happen. Yes, please. I’ll drop you a mail when you can upload. Have you verified whether your

Please hint shibboleth-sp2 and friends into testing

shibboleth-sp2 and all of its dependant packages have finally been built on all architectures. Could you hint shibboleth-sp2, xmltooling, and opensaml2 into testing? If I have the syntax right, the following should do it: easy shibboleth-sp2/2.1.dfsg1-2 xmltooling/1.1-1 opensaml2/2.1-1 Thanks!

[SRM] kvm upload from lenny

Hi, the version of kvm in lenny hangs when a VM using virtio is rebooted (#506972). This has been fixed upstream and i've updated the version in unstable with this fix. It would be nice to have this fixed in lenny, too, as this affects most users which use virtio. An updated package is in propose

Re: Libass transition

Le Thu 26 Mar 09 à 07:57 +0100, Sebastian Dröge a écrit : > Am Mittwoch, den 25.03.2009, 23:16 +0100 schrieb Christophe Mutricy: > > Can I upload libass 0.9.6 in unstable. It has a SO version with these > > reverse dependency: > Are there API changes or just ABI changes? In case of the former, coul

Re: Libass transition

Le Thu 26 Mar 09 à 12:07 +0100, Adeodato Simó a écrit : > Have you verified > whether your reverse dependencies rebuild without problems against the > new version? Both build fine. -- Xtophe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Please remove shaketracker from testing

shaketracker was the only remaining reverse-dependency of gtkmm (for GTK 1.2), which was recently removed. As such, shaketracker is now uninstallable. Please remove it from testing. There's an RC bug in place, which prevents migration until ported to recent GTK. Cheers, Moritz -- To U

Re: Please remove shaketracker from testing

Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: shaketracker was the only remaining reverse-dependency of gtkmm (for GTK 1.2), which was recently removed. As such, shaketracker is now uninstallable. Please remove it from testing. There's an RC bug in place, which prevents migration until ported to recent GTK. Chee

Re: Deadlines 5.0 r1 Release Notes

Il giorno sab, 21/03/2009 alle 12.07 +0100, W. Martin Borgert ha scritto: > On 2009-03-21 07:44, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Martin, I think the proposed schedule is OK. > > It's now published here: > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases/PointReleases/5.0.1#ReleaseNotesSchedule Hi Martin, and h